HR AI Index
Index Vendors › SimplyBook.me · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

SimplyBook.me

7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SimplyBook.me was named 5 times in Workforce scheduling and 1 other category, where Deputy led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SimplyBook.me for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%31 of 940%3under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition0%58 of 7250%2under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SimplyBook.me yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SimplyBook.me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for businesses that want a fully branded, highly customizable booking page” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steeper setup/learning curve, booking limits on plans, occasional sync/caching glitches, and timezone confusion.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SimplyBook.me, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SimplyBook.me was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Calendly6 of 72Not in the top three
Acuity Scheduling6 of 70Not in the top three
Square Appointments4 of 70Not in the top three
Cal.com3 of 70Not in the top three
Doodle3 of 70Not in the top three
Setmore3 of 70Not in the top three
YouCanBookMe3 of 70Not in the top three
Clockwise2 of 70Not in the top three
GoodTime2 of 70Not in the top three
Google Calendar2 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SimplyBook.me. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named SimplyBook.me and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cal.com4
capterra.com4
calendly.com3
lunacal.ai3
youcanbook.me3
adamenfroy.com2
forbes.com2
g2.com2
gitnux.org2
guideflow.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming SimplyBook.me came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SimplyBook.me

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SimplyBook.me; a claim can dispute any of them.
SimplyBook.Me 1Simplybook.me 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SimplyBook.me's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SimplyBook.me, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at simplybookme.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack