HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Webflow · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Webflow

6Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Webflow was named 5 times in Course authoring tools and 1 other category, where Articulate 360 led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market85 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Webflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	85 of 86	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	40 of 81	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Webflow yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Webflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“build your site on Webflow and use Byteline to sync your ATS jobs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“some users find that coding eLearning solutions by hand is faster and more efficient than using Webflow” Mistral Small · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · hard negative

“Overly complex for non-coders; users report it'd be faster to hand-code solutions.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · hard negative

“poor fits for full course creation, such as Canva, Webflow, and Genially” Perplexity Sonar · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Webflow, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Webflow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Canva3 of 60Not in the top three

WordPress3 of 60Not in the top three

Phenom2 of 61Not in the top three

Adobe Captivate2 of 60Not in the top three

H5P2 of 60Not in the top three

Lever2 of 60Not in the top three

Pinpoint1 of 61Not in the top three

Articulate Rise 3601 of 60Not in the top three

Articulate Storyline1 of 60Not in the top three

Ashby1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Webflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 6 answers that named Webflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elearningindustry.com3

reddit.com3

w3.org3

coassemble.com2

elearningsolutionslab.com2

linkedin.com2

blog.exceeds.ai1

blog.hubspot.com1

capterra.com1

captivateteacher.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Webflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

elearningindustry.com/introducing-a-new-authoring-tool-pitfalls-avoid3

elearningindustry.com/the-authoring-tool-market-has-changed-how-to-choose-wisely-in-20263

reddit.com/r/instructionaldesign/comments/1n75pke/short_review_of_some_authoring_tools3

coassemble.com/blog/ai-elearning-authoring-tool2

elearningsolutionslab.com/best-elearning-authoring-tools2

linkedin.com/pulse/pitfalls-choosing-wrong-authoring-tool-sajitha-jayaprakash-57nkf2

w3.org/WAI/AU/WAI-AUTOOLS-TECHS2

eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37066/1/TAP_Chapter_The_Authoring_Tool_Evaluation_Problem_v4.pdf1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Webflow

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Webflow; a claim can dispute any of them.

Webflow (for e-learning) 1Webflow/Wordpress 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Webflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Webflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at webflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.