HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › WordPress · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

WordPress

12Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WordPress was named 5 times in Internal communications and 2 other categories, where Happeo led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business77 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market70 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise71 of 73

under the label threshold

In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named WordPress for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	70 of 80	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	58 of 81	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	66 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WordPress yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WordPress across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid: Using public-facing website builders (like WordPress or Joomla) to host your internal communications.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WordPress, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WordPress was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint5 of 121Not in the top three

Drupal4 of 120Not in the top three

Simpplr4 of 120Not in the top three

Notion3 of 120Not in the top three

Unily3 of 120Not in the top three

Webflow3 of 120Not in the top three

Google Sites2 of 121Not in the top three

Phenom2 of 121Not in the top three

H5P2 of 120Not in the top three

Jive2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WordPress. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 12 answers that named WordPress and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

agilityportal.io1

appfinderx.com1

axerosolutions.com1

blog.shrub.com1

capterra.com1

clickhelp.com1

colossyan.com1

confirm.com1

contentops.so1

contentstack.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming WordPress came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.shrub.com/some-good-reasons-to-avoid-adobe-cc1

agilityportal.io/blog/intranet-solutions-comparison1

appfinderx.com/adobe-creative-cloud-review1

axerosolutions.com/blog/best-intranet-software-platforms-compared1

capterra.com/resources/tech-trends-purchase-regret-by-business-size1

clickhelp.com/clickhelp-technical-writing-blog/7-reasons-why-your-help-authoring-tool-isnt1

colossyan.com/posts/elearning-authoring-tools-comparison-chart-for-2026-top-10-tools1

confirm.com/blog/elearning-authoring-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as WordPress

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WordPress; a claim can dispute any of them.

Webflow/Wordpress 1WordPress (with an Intranet Theme like Woffice) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WordPress's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WordPress, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wordpress.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.