Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Employee onboarding › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition
Employee onboarding for enterprise buyers
Asked as “employee onboarding software”, and as “new hire onboarding platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Workday12Enboarder10Rippling32others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 49% → 49%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Workday held the lead, ±0 points on 49%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BambooHR34%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 38% → 34%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Rippling25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Rippling (24%) replaces BambooHR (29% then, 20% now), 4 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Workday47%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 49% → 49%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
BambooHR34%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 38% → 34%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketRippling25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Rippling (24%) replaces BambooHR (29% then, 20% now), 4 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseWorkday47%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 49% → 49%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Workday47%19%62endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 49% → 49%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.49% → 49%
Workday47%19%62endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 49% → 49%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.49% → 49%02
Enboarder12%8%26accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 8%
Enboarder12%8%26accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 8%03
SAP SuccessFactors10%14%42accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 9%
SAP SuccessFactors10%14%42accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 9%04Rippling10%22%45accepted challenger▼−16Since September 2026: 27% → 11%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 11%
Rippling10%22%45accepted challenger▼−16Since September 2026: 27% → 11%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 11%05BambooHR5%64%28criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
BambooHR5%64%28criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%06
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Deel0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Deel0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
UKG Pro0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
UKG Pro0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
ServiceNow HR Service Delivery0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ServiceNow HR Service Delivery0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Click Boarding0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Click Boarding0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Darwinbox0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Darwinbox0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Rippling vs PersonioRippling vs ConnecteamRippling vs GustoRippling vs DeelBambooHR vs Zoho PeopleBambooHR vs HiBobBambooHR vs PersonioBambooHR vs ConnecteamBambooHR vs GustoBambooHR vs DeelZoho People vs HiBobZoho People vs PersonioZoho People vs ConnecteamZoho People vs GustoZoho People vs DeelHiBob vs PersonioHiBob vs ConnecteamHiBob vs GustoHiBob vs DeelPersonio vs ConnecteamPersonio vs GustoPersonio vs DeelConnecteam vs GustoConnecteam vs DeelGusto vs Deel
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Workday47%
Workday47%02Enboarder12%
Enboarder12%03SAP SuccessFactors10%
SAP SuccessFactors10%04Rippling10%
Rippling10%05BambooHR5%
BambooHR5%06Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM2%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM2%07ServiceNow HR Service Delivery0%
ServiceNow HR Service Delivery0%08Click Boarding0%
Click Boarding0%09Darwinbox0%
Darwinbox0%10Deel0%
Deel0%11UKG Pro0%
UKG Pro0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BambooHR64%
18 of 28 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid or Approach with Caution: **BambooHR**: ... poor scalability beyond 100-500 employees” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Workday19%
12 of 62 labels negative · 11 of 14 models
“**Workday**: Despite market leadership, users frequently cite complexity, steep learning curves, and onboarding experiences that aren't engaging” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Rippling22%
10 of 45 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Rippling if cost predictability is your top priority, as modular add-ons can inflate costs unexpectedly.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Gusto100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“native onboarding modules in **Gusto, Zenefits, or smaller versions of BambooHR**) often hit a hard ceiling” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1106 links across 303 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
39 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
vendor site · HR Cloud35 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Darwinbox23 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Paycor22 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Asana20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Monday.com20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Personio19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Moveworks17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Docebo15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee onboarding software”, “employee onboarding software”, “onboarding platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workday workday.com | 47% | 383 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 | 80 | ||
| Enboarder enboarder.com | 12% | 43 | 590 | 7 | 23,446 | 14 | ||
| SAP parent site SAP SuccessFactors 10% | 10% | 477 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Rippling rippling.com | 10% | 1260 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | |
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 5% | 1082 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 | 1 |
| Trainual trainual.com | 3% | 93 | 22,200 | 94 | 40,498 | 10 | ||
| Oracle parent site Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM 2% | 2% | 283 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Sapling | 2% | 14,800 | 5,367 | |||||
| Docebo docebo.com | 2% | 351 | 9,900 | 242 | 98,677 | 15 | 7 | |
| ClearCompany clearcompany.com | 2% | 10 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (docebo.com, paycor.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best employee onboarding software” is paycor.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best employee onboarding software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which new hire onboarding platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade onboarding platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee onboarding software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an employee onboarding software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which onboarding platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayWorkdayChangedRipplingBambooHRagainst: Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workdayno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, HiBob, Lattice, Rippling, VMware Workspace ONE
Three alternatives
Click Boarding, Deel, EnboarderTwo alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, RipplingFive alternatives
Deel, Oyster, SAP SuccessFactors, Trainual, WorkdayGPT-5.4 miniWorkdaySAP SuccessFactorsChangedagainst: BambooHROracle Fusion Cloud HCM – Enterprise Onboarding, SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: BambooHR, Paycor, Rippling, UKG ProWorkdayno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors HCM, ServiceNow HR Service DeliveryOne alternative
WorkdayFive alternatives
Pendo, ServiceNow HR Service Delivery, WalkMe, Whatfix, WorkdayThree alternatives
EMP Trust HR, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProGemini 3.5 FlashRipplingagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayEnboarderChangedWorkday HCM OnboardingWorkBrightno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Eddy, Gusto, HubSpot, Mailchimp, Oracle Taleo, Rippling, SharePoint, Smartsheet, Trello
Three alternatives
Enboarder, Sapling, TeleskopeEight alternatives
Click Boarding, EMPTrust HR, Kallidus Sapling, Okta Workflows, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, ServiceNow HR Service Delivery, WorkdayTwo alternatives
Enboarder, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
Click Boarding, Connecteam, Enboarder, ExactHirePerplexity SonarWorkdayWorkdayHeldagainst: BambooHRno first choiceWorkdayno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Three alternatives
Oracle HCM Onboarding, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsOne alternative
HR CloudTwo alternatives
Docebo, RipplingGrok 4.1 FastWorkdayagainst: BambooHR, Deel, HiBobWorkdayHeldWalkMe, WhatfixRipplingagainst: BambooHR, WorkdayRippling, Workdayagainst: BambooHR, Gustoagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Monday.com, Workday
Two alternatives
Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsThree alternatives
Appcues, Pendo, UserpilotTwo alternatives
ADP, DeelThree alternatives
Darwinbox, Factorial, SAP SuccessFactorsMistral SmallBambooHR, WorkdayWorkdayChangedSAP SuccessFactorsTrainualno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, Myonboard, Rippling, Workday
Two alternatives
Paycor, RocketlaneOne alternative
ClearCompanyThree alternatives
Deel, Rippling, WorkdayOne alternative
WorkdayDeepSeek V4 FlashWorkdayEnboarder, WorkdayChangedWorkdayagainst: BambooHRSAP SuccessFactorsagainst: Ripplingno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Coassemble, Cornerstone OnDemand, Enboarder, Factorial, Gusto, HR Cloud, Innform, Justworks, Looop, SAP Litmos, WorkBright, Zoho People
Three alternatives
Enboarder, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsThree alternatives
Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, iCIMSEight alternatives
Click Boarding, Enboarder, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Sapling, WorkBright, iCIMSTwo alternatives
Enboarder, WorkdayLlama 4 MaverickClearCompany, Docebo, TalmundoWorkdayChangedno first choiceTrainualDisprzagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, Myonboard, Rippling, Workday
Two alternatives
Lever, PaylocityTwo alternatives
BambooHR, WorkdayTwo alternatives
Bubble, HR CloudQwen 3.7 FlashEnboarderRippling, WorkdayChangedEnboarder, WorkdayWorkdayagainst: Oracle Taleono first choiceagainst: Asana, BambooHR, Confluence, Gusto, Microsoft Forms, Monday.com, Notion, PeopleSoft, SharePoint, SuccessFactors, Trello, Workday, Zenefits
Four alternatives
Rippling, WalkMe, Waybook, WhatfixOne alternative
SAP SuccessFactorsOne alternative
SailpointThree alternatives
Enboarder, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsKimi K2SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayWorkdayChangedSAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayOracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Workdayagainst: BambooHR EliteEnboarder, Rippling, Sapling, Workdayagainst: BambooHR, Gustoagainst: BambooHR, SuccessFactors, Workday, iCIMS
Three alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, ServiceNow HR Service DeliveryTwo alternatives
Darwinbox, RipplingSeven alternatives
Click Boarding, Deel, Enboarder, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, ServiceNow HR Service Delivery, UKG Pro / DayforceTwo alternatives
Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsGLM 4.7 FlashXWorkdayWorkdayHeldEnboarderSAP SuccessFactors, Workdayagainst: HiBob, Ripplingno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Paycor, Paylocity, PersonioThree alternatives
Enboarder, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsFive alternatives
ADP, BambooHR, Rippling, WorkBright, WorkdayMiniMax M2.5WorkdayWorkdayHeldno first choiceSimpliTrainagainst: Ripplingno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Four alternatives
Darwinbox, Deel, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsOne alternative
ADP OnboardingGPT-6 LunaEnboarderEnboarderHeldWorkdaySAP SuccessFactorsno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Two alternatives
SuccessFactors Onboarding, Workday Onboarding PlansTwo alternatives
ServiceNow Lifecycle Events, WorkdaySix alternatives
ADP Lyric HCM, ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProMuse Glimmer 30BEnboarder, WorkdayWorkdayChangedSAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayBambooHRagainst: Enboarder, FirstHR, JazzHR, SAP SuccessFactors, Workdayno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Greenhouse, Gusto, HiBob, Myonboard, Rippling, Workday HCM native onboarding
One alternative
Click BoardingOne alternative
SAP SuccessFactorsSeven alternatives
ADP Lyric HCM, Click Boarding, Cornerstone OnDemand, Enboarder, Oracle HCM Onboarding, Rippling, ServiceNow HR Service DeliveryOne alternative
RipplingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 19 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 21 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 9 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 15 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 9 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 22 | 53 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 12 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 17 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:15 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 25 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 2 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 28 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:46 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:40 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:37 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 3 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 23 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:07 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 23 | 103 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Oracle read as Oracle HCM Onboarding
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow HR Service Delivery
Workday HCM read as Workday
Workday HCM (Onboarding module) read as Workday
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP Onboarding
Cvent
EMP Trust HR
EMPTrust HR
ExactHire (OnboardCentric)
Guide CX
Kallidus Sapling
Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows
Okta Workflows
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM – Enterprise Onboarding
Oracle HCM Cloud Onboarding
SAP HR onboarding
Sailpoint
SuccessFactors Onboarding
Supademo
VMware Workspace ONE
Welcome
Workday HCM Onboarding
Workday HCM native onboarding
Workday Onboarding Plans
Zensai
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.