AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Frontline employee apps › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Frontline employee apps for enterprise buyers

Asked as “frontline employee communication app”, and as “deskless workforce app”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · Blink 24%
35Staffbase24Blink06MangoApps35others

35% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▲+4Since September 2026: 32% → 36%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Staffbase held the lead, +4 points on 32%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Staffbase35%12%50endorsed leader▲+4Since September 2026: 32% → 36%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 36%
02Blink24%2%45accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 21% → 24%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 24%
03MangoApps6%4%25accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%
04Beekeeper4%13%30accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
05Connecteam4%23%35accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%
06Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers4%41%22criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 5%
07WorkJam2%4%24accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11WhatsApp Lab in the set0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Workvivo0%23%22accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
10Firstup0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
08YOOBIC0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

WhatsApp is made by Meta, whose model Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Glimmer 30B is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 8; the other twelve models zero times of 48. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Staffbase35%
02Blink24%
03MangoApps6%
04Beekeeper4%
05Connecteam4%
06Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers4%
07WorkJam2%
08YOOBIC0%
09Workvivo0%
10Firstup0%
11WhatsApp0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
WhatsApp
100%
10 of 10 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“frontline employees lack proper work tools, they often turn to WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, or personal Gmail accounts, creating oversight problems and risks for sensitive company data to leak.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Facebook Messenger
100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“they often turn to WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, or personal Gmail accounts, creating oversight problems and risks for sensitive company data to leak.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Telegram
100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“consumer-grade messaging apps like WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram, as they are not suited for the workplace and can pose security risks” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Signal
100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“should be cautious about—or avoid—using consumer-grade frontline apps, especially messaging and communication tools like WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1081 links across 235 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 67 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · MangoApps54 answers · 120 citations · 13 models
40 answers · 68 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Guideflow39 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Staffbase36 answers · 53 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Oak30 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
21 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · AgilityPortal19 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sociabble17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · RedeApp16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best frontline employee communication app”, “frontline apps”, “frontline employee communication app”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Staffbase staffbase.com35%1971,9004636,25644
Blink joinblink.com24%164201,00096,47917,40048
MangoApps mangoapps.com6%9772038,205$24122
Beekeeper lumapps.com4%7674,00010,29326,580$15844
Connecteam connecteam.com4%57349,500288312,449$13,5041202
UKG Pro ukg.com4%45790,5001,257310,168$11,996120
Microsoft 365 for frontline microsoft.com
Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers 4%
4%66907145,358,109$12,455103
WorkForce Software workforce.com4%331,000162349,6030
WorkJam workjam.com2%5018,10035712,1263
Skedulo skedulo.com2%12880152,1600

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (getflip.com, joinblink.com). The first result for “best frontline employee communication app” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best frontline employee communication app for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which deskless workforce app would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade frontline apps and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best frontline employee communication app for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a frontline employee communication app. What should we look at?”Negative“Which frontline apps should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Connecteam
Three alternativesLumApps, Oak Engage, Staffbase
no first choiceChangedWorkJam
Five alternativesBeekeeper, Connecteam, Flip, MangoApps, Workforce.com
Blink
Two alternativesRedeApp, Staffbase
against: Beekeeper
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Gmail, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Slack, WhatsApp
GPT-5.4 miniStaffbase
Three alternativesWorkJam, Workvivo, goHappy
Microsoft 365 for Frontline WorkersChanged
Two alternativesConnecteam, Workday Frontline Workforce Solutions
Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, WorkJam
Two alternativesBlue Yonder WFM, Zebra Reflexis
Staffbase
One alternativeMangoApps
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashBlink, Staffbase
Two alternativesBeekeeper, Workvivo
against: Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Slack, Workplace from Meta
WorkJamChanged
Six alternativesBlink, Flip, MangoApps, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Staffbase, Viva Connections
Beekeeper, WorkJam
Four alternativesBlink, Staffbase, YOOBIC, goHappy
against: Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Zipline
Three alternativesConnecteam, Haystack, RedeApp
no first choiceagainst: Crew Mobile App, Facebook Messenger, WeChat, WhatsApp, Workplace from Meta, iMessage
Perplexity SonarStaffbase
One alternativeMangoApps
MangoAppsChanged
Three alternativesBlink, WorkJam, YOOBIC
MangoApps
Six alternativesBlink, Firstup, Staffbase, Wooqer, WorkJam, theEMPLOYEEapp
against: Workday
Staffbase
Three alternativesBlink, Connecteam, WorkJam
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastBlink
Three alternativesBeekeeper, Staffbase, Workvivo
StaffbaseChanged
Three alternativesBeekeeper, Blink, UKG Pro
against: Connecteam
Blink
Six alternativesBeekeeper, Connecteam, MangoApps, Microsoft Frontline Worker/Cloud for Frontline Workers, Staffbase, WorkJam
against: Deputy, When I Work, Workvivo
Blink
One alternativeMicrosoft 365 for Frontline Workers
against: Beekeeper, Connecteam, LumApps, Staffbase, WorkJam, Workvivo
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Signal, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp, iMessage
Mistral SmallBlink
Four alternativesBeekeeper, Firstup, HubEngage, Staffbase
Microsoft 365 with Viva, StaffbaseChanged
Three alternativesADP WorkForce Software, Connecteam, Skedulo
no first choiceStaffbase
Two alternativesBlink, Workvivo
no first choiceagainst: Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp
DeepSeek V4 FlashStaffbase
Four alternativesBeekeeper, Blink, Connecteam, Firstup
StaffbaseHeld
One alternativeBlink
against: Connecteam
Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Staffbase
Five alternativesBeekeeper, Blink, MangoApps, WorkJam, YOOBIC
against: Connecteam
Blink
One alternativeMicrosoft 365 for Frontline Workers
against: Beekeeper, Connecteam, Staffbase, Workvivo
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Gmail, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Yahoo
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceBeekeeper, Connecteam, SkeduloChangedno first choiceSimpplr
Two alternativesBlink, Connecteam
no first choiceagainst: Frontline Education, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Signal, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp
Qwen 3.7 FlashMangoApps
Two alternativesBlink, WorkJam
UKG ProChanged
One alternativeConnecteam
MangoApps, Unily
Three alternativesConnecteam, Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday
against: SharePoint
Blink
Two alternativesMicrosoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Staffbase
against: Breakroom, Rock.so
no first choiceagainst: Salesforce
Kimi K2Staffbase
Two alternativesBeekeeper, Connecteam
Blink, MangoAppsChanged
One alternativeConnecteam
against: Staffbase
Blink
Three alternativesBeekeeper, Staffbase, Workvivo
against: Connecteam, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Unily
Staffbase
Two alternativesRock.so, Zelos
against: Blink, Connecteam, Firstup, Simpplr
Staffbase
Two alternativesBlink, Workvivo
against: MangoApps, Yourco
against: Facebook Messenger, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Microsoft Viva, SharePoint, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp
GLM 4.7 FlashXStaffbase
Two alternativesFirstup, WorkJam
UKG Pro, WorkForce SoftwareChanged
Three alternativesConnecteam, Humand, Staffbase
no first choice
Four alternativesConnecteam, Skedulo, Staffbase, WorkJam
against: Workday
Blink
One alternativeConnecteam
against: Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
no first choiceagainst: Discord, Dropbox, Facebook Messenger, Google Drive, LINE, Telegram, WhatsApp, iMessage
MiniMax M2.5Blink
Two alternativesMangoApps, Staffbase
Staffbase, WorkForce SoftwareChanged
Three alternativesADP WorkForce Software, Beekeeper, Skedulo
MangoApps
Four alternativesBlink, Connecteam, Staffbase, WorkJam
Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
One alternativeBlink
against: Connecteam, Simpplr, Staffbase, Workvivo
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, LINE, Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, Signal, Slack, Staffbase, Telegram, WeChat, WhatsApp
GPT-6 LunaStaffbase
Two alternativesBlink, Workvivo
StaffbaseHeld
Two alternativesTeams for frontline workers, Workvivo
Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Six alternativesAxonify, Beekeeper, Staffbase, UKG Pro, WorkJam, Zebra Workcloud Enterprise Collaboration
Microsoft Teams with Microsoft 365 F1
One alternativeStaffbase
no first choiceagainst: Teams Walkie Talkie
Muse Glimmer 30BBeekeeper, Blink
Two alternativesConnecteam, Staffbase
Beekeeper, now the LumApps Frontline PlatformChanged
Two alternativesStaffbase, WorkForce Software
against: Workplace from Meta
Beekeeper/LumApps
Seven alternativesConnecteam, MangoApps, Staffbase, Tulip, WorkJam, Workday, YOOBIC
Blink
One alternativeMicrosoft 365 for Frontline Workers
against: Beekeeper, Staffbase, Workvivo
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Frontline Education, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:29yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:34yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:51yes1630 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:19yes204 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:43yes239 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:08yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:44yes2229 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:40yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:00yes872 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:45yes1012 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:32yes2319 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:13yes1847 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:34yes323 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:06yes1419 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:18no03 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:04yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:29yes2324 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:09yes183 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:06yes2510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:19yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:55yes2455 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:56yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:47yes530 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:31yes1928 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:13yes1524 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:33yes728 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:35yes315 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:19yes1517 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:09yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:33yes59 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:11yes1733 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:07yes185 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:18yes219 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:35yes1010 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:00yes2166 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:07yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:46yes1752 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:30yes2430 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:22yes24253 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:17yes832 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:15yes721 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:45yes2245 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:59yes178 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:21yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:06yes1833 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:42yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:37yes2014 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:23yes64 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:48yes2549 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:56yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:47yes1387 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:20yes1929 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:49yes2133 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:29yes2052 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:33yes226 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:18yes2135 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:52yes1714 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:49yes27 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:15no043 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:23yes2010 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:15yes2010 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:51no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:33yes2242 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:48yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:49no040 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:49yes1430 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:54yes1447 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:50no015 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:34yes321 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:18yes1330 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:37yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:55yes46 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:16yes1152 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:47yes246 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:06yes259 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:38yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:36yes2228 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:45yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:14no035 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:11yes1831 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:15yes2439 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:37yes559 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:02yes416 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:20yes2040 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce
Microsoft Teams read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams (Frontline Edition) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams (Frontline F1/F3 Licenses) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams (Frontline Worker / F-Licensing) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams (Frontline) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams Frontline read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams Frontline (F1/F3) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams Frontline (F3) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams for Frontline Workers (Microsoft 365 F3/F1) read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams for frontline workers read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Teams read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers
Unresolved, counted raw
Beekeeper, now the LumApps Frontline Platform
Blue Yonder WFM
Crew Mobile App (by Square/Block)
Element
IFS
Microsoft Frontline Worker/Cloud for Frontline Workers
Microsoft Teams with Microsoft 365 F1
Pickcel
Salesforce Field Service
ServiceNow FSM
Teams Walkie Talkie
Teams for frontline workers
Tulip
Wooqer
Workday Frontline Workforce Solutions
Workgrid
Yahoo
Zebra Workcloud Enterprise Collaboration
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Employee wellbeingHR AI assistants →