HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › 7Geese · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

7Geese

9Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. 7Geese was named 7 times in Goals and OKRs, where Tability led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business41 of 49

under the label threshold

Mid-market52 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 7Geese for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	52 of 54	100%	7	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 7Geese yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 7Geese across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Ally.io, Koan, 7Geese, Gtmhub... described as no longer existing in their original form or being discontinued.” Perplexity Sonar · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

“acquired by Paycor and is no longer available as a standalone, lightweight OKR tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

“Shut down or absorbed into other platforms | No guarantee of long-term support” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

“like Ally.io, Koan, 7Geese, and standalone Gtmhub have been discontinued” Mistral Small · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 7Geese, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 7Geese was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Koan9 of 90Not in the top three

Quantive9 of 90Not in the top three

Ally.io7 of 90Not in the top three

WorkBoard6 of 90Not in the top three

Microsoft Viva Goals5 of 90Not in the top three

Asana3 of 90Not in the top three

Betterworks3 of 90Not in the top three

Lattice3 of 90Not in the top three

Profit.co3 of 90Not in the top three

Tability2 of 91Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 7Geese. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named 7Geese and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

okrstool.com8

mooncamp.com6

tability.io6

storyflow.so5

reddit.com4

saralobkovich.com4

worxmate.ai4

180ops.com3

bigideasdb.com3

medium.com3

Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming 7Geese came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software-no-longer-exists7

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software-graveyard6

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software5

storyflow.so/blog/best-okr-planning-tools-20265

saralobkovich.com/thinkydoers-pod/okr-tool-pitfalls4

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise4

worxmate.ai/resources/articles/okr-software-for-small-team4

180ops.com/blog/common-okr-pitfalls-and-how-to-avoid-them3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 7Geese's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 7Geese, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 7geese.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.