Every category where a model named Cascade Strategy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	20 of 54	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cascade Strategy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cascade Strategy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“*Most capable free tier* - Free up to 4 users with unlimited plans and metrics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

“Cascade: Free for up to 4 users” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Had modeling issues with key results in testing” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cascade Strategy, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cascade Strategy was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Betterworks14 of 194Not in the top three

Profit.co12 of 193Not in the top three

Lattice12 of 190Not in the top three

WorkBoard11 of 191Not in the top three

OKRs Tool10 of 194Not in the top three

15Five9 of 190Not in the top three

Mooncamp8 of 191Not in the top three

Perdoo7 of 190Not in the top three

Quantive7 of 190Not in the top three

Tability6 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cascade Strategy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 19 answers that named Cascade Strategy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

okrstool.com18

tability.io14

topickz.com14

mooncamp.com12

profit.co12

synergita.com6

teamflect.com6

worxmate.ai6

betterworks.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Cascade Strategy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software11

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise9

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software8

profit.co/blog/okr-university/enterprise-okr-software-comparison-top-8-platforms-reviewed8

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software8

topickz.com/list/best-okr-software-for-enterprise8

mooncamp.com/blog/okr-software-enterprise6

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cascade Strategy

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cascade Strategy; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cascade 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cascade Strategy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cascade Strategy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cascade.app is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.