HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Crewhu · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Crewhu

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Crewhu was named 3 times in Recognition and rewards, where Bonusly led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market17 of 55

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 54

under the label threshold

In recognition and rewards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Crewhu for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	17 of 55	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Crewhu yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Crewhu across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Crewhu leads for service businesses, especially MSPs, by connecting customer feedback and service-system activity to recognition.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · first choice

“Service/MSP businesses find Crewhu valuable for tying recognition to customer feedback” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Crewhu, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Crewhu was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Awardco4 of 40Not in the top three

Achievers3 of 40Not in the top three

Bonusly3 of 40Not in the top three

Workhuman2 of 41Not in the top three

Guusto2 of 40Not in the top three

Kudos2 of 40Not in the top three

Motivosity2 of 40Not in the top three

Vantage Circle2 of 40Not in the top three

WorkTango2 of 40Not in the top three

Compt1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Crewhu. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Crewhu and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

crewhu.comYour site4

selectsoftwarereviews.com3

achievers.com2

gartner.com2

matterapp.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

peoplematters.in2

tremendous.com2

workhuman.com2

awardco.com1

Eighteen of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Crewhu came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

crewhu.com/blog/employee-recognition-software4

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/employee-recognition-software3

achievers.com/blog/employee-recognition-platforms2

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-recognition-and-reward-systems2

matterapp.com/blog/employee-recognition-platform2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-recognition-platform2

peoplematters.in/article/recognition-services/top-employee-recognition-platforms-of-2024-a2

tremendous.com/blog/best-employee-recognition-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crewhu's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crewhu, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crewhu.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.