Every category where a model named WorkTango for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	15 of 55	0%	10	accepted challenger
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	52 of 77	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WorkTango yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WorkTango across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“good if you want survey + recognition in one platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

“WorkTango is a powerful double-duty platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Recognition + Surveys Combined” Kimi K2 · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“~$8,000/year (annual commitment)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkTango, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkTango was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bonusly20 of 273Not in the top three

Awardco19 of 271Not in the top three

Workhuman18 of 276Not in the top three

Motivosity17 of 270Not in the top three

Achievers15 of 272Not in the top three

Nectar15 of 270Not in the top three

Guusto10 of 270Not in the top three

Kudos10 of 270Not in the top three

Assembly9 of 270Not in the top three

O.C. Tanner Culture Cloud7 of 271Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkTango. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 27 answers that named WorkTango and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

achievers.com12

workhuman.com12

g2.com11

selectsoftwarereviews.com11

tremendous.com11

gartner.com10

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

bystadium.com9

awardco.com6

crewhu.com6

Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming WorkTango came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tremendous.com/blog/best-employee-recognition-platforms11

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-recognition-and-reward-systems10

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/employee-recognition-software9

workhuman.com/blog/employee-recognition-software9

achievers.com/blog/employee-recognition-platforms8

bystadium.com/blog/best-employee-recognition-platforms7

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-recognition-platform7

crewhu.com/blog/employee-recognition-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as WorkTango

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkTango; a claim can dispute any of them.

Kazoo 1WorkTango (formerly Kazoo) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkTango's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkTango, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at worktango.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.