Every category where a model named Motivosity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	7%	4 of 55	5%	39	accepted challenger
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	25 of 99	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	31 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	0%	41 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Motivosity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Motivosity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	5	0	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2	2	6
Mistral Small	1	0	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	4	2	0	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	1	0	4
Kimi K2	0	4	1	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels1

Paraphrase16 labels2

Comparative38 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels1

Scale-constrained12 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative101 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Motivosity: Often rated best for overall engagement and measuring impact through data.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · first choice

“If you want one recommendation without more context: Motivosity.” GPT-5.4 mini · Recognition and rewards · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“1. Motivosity - Best for engagement & impact measurement.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · first choice

“Nectar and Motivosity are frequently cited as top choices” Mistral Small · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Motivosity ($3,000 min.)—too pricey for small budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recognition and rewards · budget prompt · hard negative

“Poor mobile app or navigation: Issues in Motivosity (hard to use)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recognition and rewards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Motivosity, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Motivosity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bonusly79 of 10126Not in the top three

Nectar59 of 1018Not in the top three

Awardco54 of 1016Not in the top three

Workhuman40 of 1019Not in the top three

Achievers39 of 1016Not in the top three

Kudos37 of 1011Not in the top three

Guusto32 of 1011Not in the top three

Assembly20 of 1012Not in the top three

O.C. Tanner Culture Cloud17 of 1013Not in the top three

WorkTango17 of 1010Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Motivosity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 101 answers that named Motivosity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com58

workhuman.com54

achievers.com45

tremendous.com45

motivosity.comYour site37

peoplemanagingpeople.com37

g2.com34

gartner.com33

awardco.com29

crewhu.com26

361 of the 398 domain citations in answers naming Motivosity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/employee-recognition-software49

tremendous.com/blog/best-employee-recognition-platforms45

workhuman.com/blog/employee-recognition-software41

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-recognition-and-reward-systems31

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-recognition-platform27

crewhu.com/blog/employee-recognition-software26

achievers.com/blog/employee-recognition-platforms22

awardco.com/blog/best-employee-recognition-software21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Motivosity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Motivosity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at motivosity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.