HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Elevate · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Elevate

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Elevate was named 2 times in Contingent workforce man, where SimpleVMS led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market32 of 97

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Elevate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	32 of 97	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Elevate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Elevate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Elevate, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elevate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Fieldglass2 of 21Not in the top three

Beeline2 of 20Not in the top three

Coupa Contingent Workforce2 of 20Not in the top three

Deel2 of 20Not in the top three

Remote2 of 20Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io2 of 20Not in the top three

VectorVMS2 of 20Not in the top three

WorkMarket2 of 20Not in the top three

Worksome2 of 20Not in the top three

Magnit1 of 21Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Elevate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Elevate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org2

talentdesk.io2

worldmetrics.org2

appsruntheworld.com1

bestrecruitingtools.com1

joinnextdev.com1

peoplemanagingpeople.com1

saply.ai1

ubeya.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Elevate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software2

appsruntheworld.com/top-10-hcm-software-vendors-in-contingent-labor-management-market-segm1

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/vendor-management-system-vms-software-enterprise-20261

gitnux.org/best/contingent-labor-management-software1

gitnux.org/best/contingent-worker-software1

gitnux.org/best/contingent-workforce-software1

joinnextdev.com/blog/fieldglass-alternatives-that-actually-deliver-in-20261

joinnextdev.com/blog/magnit-alternatives-that-actually-deliver-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Elevate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Elevate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at elevatedmarketing.solutions is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.