HR AI Index
Index Vendors › FirstHR · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

FirstHR

35Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Employee onboarding for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 104 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FirstHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience2%6 of 1040%6under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Org charts and org designWorkforce planning and analytics0%47 of 810%1under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FirstHR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FirstHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FirstHR ($98 flat/month) provides the best combination of features and cost for small businesses without HR staff” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have more than ~15 employees, FirstHR's flat-fee model would save you more money.” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative
“FirstHR is highlighted as a strong small-business option at $98/month flat” Perplexity Sonar · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative
“Small teams with limited HR staff; the platform offers value‑focused pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FirstHR, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FirstHR was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR28 of 354Not in the top three
Gusto25 of 354Not in the top three
Rippling16 of 350Not in the top three
Zoho People13 of 357Not in the top three
Homebase8 of 351Not in the top three
Deel7 of 350Not in the top three
Workday5 of 352Not in the top three
Factorial5 of 350Not in the top three
ChartHop4 of 351Not in the top three
Lucidchart3 of 352Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FirstHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named FirstHR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.appYour site35
fitsmallbusiness.com15
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
forbes.com12
joinhomebase.com11
softr.io10
gusto.com9
hrcloud.com9
learn.g2.com9
effy.ai8

Ninety-six of the 131 domain citations in answers naming FirstHR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FirstHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FirstHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firsthr.app is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.