3 categories · Named, not rankedJira
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 85 of 93 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26% |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 43 of 54 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29% |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 93 of 94 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“These modules lack dedicated OKR coaching frameworks, custom check-in reminders, or formal HR-based talent management features.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Other options include Spiceworks, Jira's small team plan” Llama 4 Maverick · HR help desk · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"piggybacking" on the IT department's existing ticketing software (like standard Jira or Zendesk) to save money. This is a major compliance and security risk.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · scale prompt · hard negative
“Jira has a steep learning curve and may be overly complex for simple workflows or new users.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“Project management tools are built to track outputs ... rather than outcomes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Don't just use Jira or ServiceNow out of the box—you need HR-specific workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · HR help desk · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 18 answers that named Jira and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Jira came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Jira
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jira.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.