HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Microsoft Forms · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Forms

7Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Forms was named 2 times in 360 feedback and 1 other category, where Lattice led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In 360 feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Forms for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management0%73 of 77100%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%44 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Forms yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Forms across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“AVOID: Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Tally.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Forms, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Forms was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google Forms6 of 70Not in the top three
SurveyMonkey4 of 70Not in the top three
FeedbackPulse3 of 72Not in the top three
Workleap Officevibe3 of 71Not in the top three
Culture Amp3 of 70Not in the top three
Lattice3 of 70Not in the top three
SAP SuccessFactors3 of 70Not in the top three
Betterworks2 of 70Not in the top three
Jotform2 of 70Not in the top three
Qualtrics2 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Forms. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Microsoft Forms and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

feedbackpulse.com4
culturemonkey.io2
engagedly.com2
happily.ai2
oneadvanced.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
qualaroo.com2
selectsoftwarereviews.com2
workhuman.com2
appintent.com1

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Forms came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Forms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Forms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack