HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Satori · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Satori

7Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Satori was named 5 times in Coaching platforms, where Growthspace led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business61 of 112

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprise47 of 48

under the label threshold

In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Satori for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	27 of 116	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Satori yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Satori across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Single-link onboarding; logs ICF credential hours | Lean solo coaches with live sessions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Coaches prioritizing client discovery/qualification before high-ticket sales.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“If your business is mostly 1:1 sessions, Satori or Paperbell are more efficient” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Satori, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Satori was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoachAccountable7 of 71Not in the top three

Paperbell6 of 71Not in the top three

BetterUp5 of 71Not in the top three

Circle5 of 70Not in the top three

CoachHub5 of 70Not in the top three

Boon Health4 of 70Not in the top three

CoachVantage4 of 70Not in the top three

Growthspace4 of 70Not in the top three

Teachable4 of 70Not in the top three

Thinkific4 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Satori. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Satori and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com5

circle.so5

adamenfroy.com4

corporatevision-news.com4

learningrevolution.net4

thinkific.com4

coachilly.com3

group.app3

paperbell.com3

softwareadvice.com3

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Satori came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms5

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms5

adamenfroy.com/coaching-platforms4

corporatevision-news.com/ranking-the-top-coaching-platforms-this-year-by-features4

learningrevolution.net/online-coaching-platforms4

thinkific.com/blog/best-online-coaching-platforms4

coachilly.com/coaching-software-review-20263

group.app/blog/online-coaching-platform3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Satori's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Satori, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at satori.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.