HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › TINYpulse · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

TINYpulse

12Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TINYpulse was named 4 times in Employee engagement surv, where Culture Amp led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 124

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise85 of 92

under the label threshold

In employee engagement surv · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TINYpulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	16 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TINYpulse yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TINYpulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“StaffHero and TINYpulse are also worth considering, with plans starting under $200/month” Mistral Small · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative

“Officevibe or TINYpulse (~$5/user/month) are better fits” Kimi K2 · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Prefer ultra‑short “pulse” surveys | TINYpulse” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TINYpulse, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TINYpulse was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workleap Officevibe10 of 127Not in the top three

15Five8 of 121Not in the top three

Culture Amp6 of 122Not in the top three

FeedbackPulse4 of 122Not in the top three

Google Forms4 of 120Not in the top three

Microsoft Viva Glint3 of 121Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey3 of 120Not in the top three

Qualtrics EmployeeXM2 of 121Not in the top three

Bonusly2 of 120Not in the top three

Jotform2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TINYpulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 12 answers that named TINYpulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

feedbackpulse.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

thrivesparrow.com4

culturemonkey.io3

eletive.com3

happily.ai3

arenevo.com2

contactmonkey.com2

cultureamp.com2

formgrid.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming TINYpulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

feedbackpulse.com/resources/affordable-employee-surveys-tools4

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-employee-survey-software4

arenevo.com/en/blog/best-employee-engagement-survey-software-small-business2

contactmonkey.com/blog/pulse-survey-tool2

culturemonkey.io/employee-engagement/pulse-survey-tools2

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-free-employee-surveys-tools2

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-pulse-survey-tools2

formgrid.com/blog/employee-engagement-survey-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TINYpulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TINYpulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tinypulse.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.