HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Atlassian Goals · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Atlassian Goals

12Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Atlassian Goals was named 7 times in Goals and OKRs, where Tability led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business20 of 49

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise42 of 53

under the label threshold

In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Atlassian Goals for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	17 of 54	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Atlassian Goals yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Atlassian Goals across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“These modules lack dedicated OKR coaching frameworks, custom check-in reminders, or formal HR-based talent management features.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose Atlassian Goals if your product/engineering team lives in Jira.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative

“Atlassian Goals is free if you use Atlassian cloud plans” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“skip Atlassian Goals in favor of a lightweight purpose-built tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Atlassian Goals, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlassian Goals was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Profit.co9 of 122Not in the top three

Tability8 of 124Not in the top three

Perdoo8 of 123Not in the top three

Teamflect7 of 121Not in the top three

OKRs Tool7 of 120Not in the top three

Quantive7 of 120Not in the top three

Lattice6 of 121Not in the top three

WorkBoard6 of 121Not in the top three

Mooncamp6 of 120Not in the top three

Asana5 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Atlassian Goals. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 12 answers that named Atlassian Goals and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

okrstool.com6

tability.io6

mooncamp.com4

profit.co4

guideflow.com3

topickz.com3

gartner.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

perdoo.com2

reddit.com2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Atlassian Goals came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software4

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software4

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software4

guideflow.com/blog/okr-software3

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise3

gartner.com/reviews/market/okr-software2

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software-graveyard2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/okr-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Atlassian Goals

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Atlassian Goals; a claim can dispute any of them.

Atlassian Goals (part of Atlas) 1Jira/Atlassian Goals 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atlassian Goals's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atlassian Goals, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at atlassian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.