HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Humanity · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Humanity

11Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Humanity was named 5 times in Workforce scheduling, where Deputy led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business32 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 117

under the label threshold

In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Humanity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	21 of 94	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Humanity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Humanity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Humanity focuses heavily on the intersection of scheduling and profitability. It is highly recommended for organizations where labor cost is the primary variable” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“Offers Essentials ($2.75/user) or Professional tiers; strong scheduling features” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“platforms like Deputy, Workforce.com, or Humanity can grow with you” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“Humanity (TCP Software) – Best for Demand-Driven Scheduling” Kimi K2 · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Humanity, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Humanity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Deputy10 of 113Not in the top three

When I Work8 of 110Not in the top three

Homebase6 of 110Not in the top three

TimeTrex3 of 111Not in the top three

Workday3 of 111Not in the top three

UKG Pro3 of 110Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time2 of 110Not in the top three

Rippling2 of 110Not in the top three

Zoho People2 of 110Not in the top three

ADP WorkForce Suite1 of 111Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Humanity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 11 answers that named Humanity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

zapier.com5

softwareadvice.com4

timetrex.com4

business.com3

larksuite.com3

learn.g2.com3

toolradar.com3

capterra.com2

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Humanity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-scheduling-software5

zapier.com/blog/best-employee-scheduling-software5

timetrex.com/resources/best-online-employee-scheduling-software4

business.com/categories/employee-scheduling-software3

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/staff-scheduling-software3

learn.g2.com/employee-scheduling-tools3

softwareadvice.com/hr/employee-scheduling-comparison3

toolradar.com/guides/best-employee-scheduling-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Humanity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Humanity; a claim can dispute any of them.

Humanity (TCP Software) 3Humanity Schedule 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Humanity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Humanity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at humanity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.