HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › ONES.com · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ONES.com

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ONES.com was named 2 times in Goals and OKRs, where Tability led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business31 of 49

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ONES.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	22 of 54	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ONES.com yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ONES.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Engineering/product teams wanting Jira‑style project + OKR integration → ONES.com” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative

“4. ONES.com — Best if you also need project management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ONES.com, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ONES.com was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Perdoo3 of 30Not in the top three

Profit.co3 of 30Not in the top three

Tability3 of 30Not in the top three

OKRs Tool2 of 32Not in the top three

Google Sheets2 of 30Not in the top three

Notion2 of 30Not in the top three

Weekdone2 of 30Not in the top three

Quantive1 of 31Not in the top three

Teamflect1 of 31Not in the top three

15Five1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ONES.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named ONES.com and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mooncamp.com3

okrstool.com3

ones.com3

tability.io3

firsthr.app2

15five.com1

devokr.com1

eletive.com1

holidaylandmark.com1

lattice.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming ONES.com came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/performance/okr-software2

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools2

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software2

okrstool.com/blog/free-okr-software2

okrstool.com/blog/okr-tools-for-small-businesses2

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software2

15five.com/blog/heres-why-people-choose-15five-over-lattice1

devokr.com/en/blog/best-okr-software-comparison1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ONES.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ONES.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onescom.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.