HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Synergita · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Synergita

18Judge labels

2First choices

4Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Synergita was named 7 times in Goals and OKRs, where Tability led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 49

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise10 of 53

under the label threshold

In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Synergita for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	2%	12 of 54	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Synergita yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Synergita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For the tightest budgets, Synergita at $3/user/month offers excellent value” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“Enterprises needing full HR/performance integration → Betterworks or Synergita” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative

“Synergita if you prefer per-seat pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

“consider Teamflect or Synergita” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“HR-suite "goals modules" (... Synergita) ... Risky if you want dedicated OKR tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Synergita, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Synergita was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Profit.co11 of 181Not in the top three

OKRs Tool10 of 184Not in the top three

Tability10 of 184Not in the top three

Perdoo9 of 181Not in the top three

Lattice8 of 180Not in the top three

Mooncamp7 of 182Not in the top three

WorkBoard7 of 181Not in the top three

15Five7 of 180Not in the top three

Betterworks7 of 180Not in the top three

Leapsome6 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Synergita. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 18 answers that named Synergita and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tability.io13

mooncamp.com12

synergita.comYour site12

okrstool.com11

topickz.com7

ones.com5

profit.co5

worxmate.ai5

firsthr.app4

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

Sixty-six of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Synergita came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software9

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software8

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise7

synergita.com/blog/okr-pricing-feature-comparison6

synergita.com/blog/best-okr-software-startups-performance-management5

firsthr.app/compare/performance/okr-software4

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools4

okrstool.com/blog/okr-tools-for-small-businesses4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Synergita's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Synergita, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at synergita.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.