HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Thrivea · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Thrivea

12Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Thrivea was named 3 times in Workforce planning, where ChartHop led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Thrivea for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%27 of 890%3under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Thrivea yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Thrivea across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels3
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options include Thrivea, which provides live visibility into the team and ties planning into real workflows” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Balances affordability with live visibility into your team ... making it a strong choice for small businesses.” Mistral Small · Workforce planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Thrivea - Best Free Strategic Planning” Kimi K2 · Workforce planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Thrivea, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Thrivea was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Homebase6 of 126Not in the top three
Keka6 of 120Not in the top three
ChartHop4 of 120Not in the top three
Zoho People3 of 120Not in the top three
Rippling2 of 121Not in the top three
Anaplan2 of 120Not in the top three
BambooHR2 of 120Not in the top three
Deel HR2 of 120Not in the top three
Monday.com2 of 120Not in the top three
Runn2 of 120Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Thrivea. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Thrivea and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thrivea.comYour site11
learn.g2.com8
joinhomebase.com6
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
saviom.com6
dialzara.com4
guideflow.com4
g2.com3
selectsoftwarereviews.com3
cubesoftware.com2

Forty-two of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Thrivea came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Thrivea's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Thrivea, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thrivea.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.