HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Workforce.com · September 2026 Edition
6 categories · Ranked

Workforce.com

37Judge labels
5First choices
3Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
6Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Workforce management sui for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 95 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workforce.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll4%10 of 9510%10accepted challenger
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience0%26 of 970%5under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%26 of 940%3under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%54 of 890%2under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%42 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%
Time and attendanceCore HR and payroll0%68 of 900%1under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workforce.com yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workforce.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01405
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX02204
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels3
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Workforce.com - an all-in-one workforce management and HRIS platform designed specifically for shift-based, hourly teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Workforce.com” Kimi K2 · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Workforce.com is a stronger fit if payroll-native workforce architecture is a priority” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative
“Multi‑site operations needing payroll in the same system | Workforce.com” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Glitches/slowdowns (notifications, clock-ins), bot-only live chat support” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workforce.com, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workforce.com was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deputy21 of 376Not in the top three
Connecteam20 of 373Not in the top three
When I Work14 of 371Not in the top three
Homebase12 of 372Not in the top three
UKG Pro11 of 374Not in the top three
Workday10 of 371Not in the top three
WorkJam9 of 372Not in the top three
Rippling9 of 370Not in the top three
ADP Workforce Now8 of 371Not in the top three
MangoApps7 of 372Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workforce.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 37 answers that named Workforce.com and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com24
peoplemanagingpeople.com18
mangoapps.com14
workforce.comYour site14
learn.g2.com13
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com10
gartner.com10
nowsta.com10
softwareadvice.com10
worldmetrics.org10

119 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Workforce.com came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workforce.com

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workforce.com; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workforce.com (Workforce Management) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workforce.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workforce.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack