HRIS and HCM platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “HRIS”, and as “human capital management platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
73%
Clear leader
73Workday HCM05HiBob05Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM18others
73% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+6Since September 2026: 70% → 76%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Workday HCM held the lead, +6 points on 70%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Gusto32%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 42% → 33%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Rippling26%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 22% → 28%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Workday HCM73%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 70% → 76%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Gusto32%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 42% → 33%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketRippling26%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 22% → 28%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseWorkday HCM73%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 70% → 76%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Workday HCM73%16%68endorsed leader▲+6Since September 2026: 70% → 76%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.70% → 76%
Workday HCM73%16%68endorsed leader▲+6Since September 2026: 70% → 76%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.70% → 76%02
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM5%13%55accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 3%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM5%13%55accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 3%03
HiBob5%29%14criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
HiBob5%29%14criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%04Rippling5%50%28criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
Rippling5%50%28criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%05
SAP SuccessFactors2%15%59accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 3%
SAP SuccessFactors2%15%59accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 3%06
Dayforce2%0%24accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 3%
Dayforce2%0%24accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 3%07
ADP Workforce Now2%16%32accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 3%
ADP Workforce Now2%16%32accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 3%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
BambooHR0%71%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
BambooHR0%71%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
UKG Pro0%10%48accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
UKG Pro0%10%48accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Rippling vs ADP Workforce NowRippling vs PaylocityRippling vs GustoRippling vs UKG ProZoho People vs HiBobZoho People vs BambooHRZoho People vs ADP Workforce NowZoho People vs PaylocityZoho People vs GustoZoho People vs UKG ProHiBob vs BambooHRHiBob vs ADP Workforce NowHiBob vs PaylocityHiBob vs GustoHiBob vs UKG ProBambooHR vs ADP Workforce NowBambooHR vs PaylocityBambooHR vs GustoBambooHR vs UKG ProADP Workforce Now vs PaylocityADP Workforce Now vs GustoADP Workforce Now vs UKG ProPaylocity vs GustoPaylocity vs UKG ProGusto vs UKG Pro
One product takes 73% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eleven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Mistral Small, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Rippling50%
14 of 28 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Smaller/Mid-Market Platforms (e.g., BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, HR Cloud) ... Why avoid? Explicitly not built for enterprise scale” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
BambooHR71%
12 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Positioned as first HRIS for 25-300 employees... "Enterprise clients often outgrow BambooHR's templated approach."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Workday HCM16%
11 of 68 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“not "bad" choices for enterprises, but they are the ones you should be most cautious about if your team is sensitive to **long deployments, steep learning curves, and high implementation cost**” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Gusto100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Examples to Avoid/Caution: **Gusto**, **Zenefits**, **Hummu**. ... Why to Avoid: These are designed for flat organizational structures.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1110 links across 244 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · HiBob42 answers · 63 citations · 12 models
34 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Rippling26 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Deel24 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Paycor21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Siit19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Lattice17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
28 answers · 12 models
28 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best hris”, “hris”, “hris platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workday parent site Workday HCM 73% | 73% | 216 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM 5% | 5% | 283 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| HiBob hibob.com | 5% | 337 | 14,800 | 154 | 266,143 | $54 | 120 | 6 |
| Rippling rippling.com | 5% | 1260 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | |
| SAP parent site SAP SuccessFactors 2% | 2% | 477 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Ceridian dayforce.com Dayforce 2% | 2% | 278 | 450,000 | 2,983 | 208,252 | 38 | ||
| ADP parent site ADP Workforce Now 2%, ADP Vantage 0%, ADP Vantage HCM 0% | 2% | 592 | 2,740,000 | 23,897 | ||||
| IceHrm Pro icehrm.com | 2% | 4 | ||||||
| HR Cloud hrcloud.com | 2% | 21 | ||||||
| Personio personio.com | 2% | 106 | 2,400 | 37 | 224,863 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com, hibob.com, paycor.com). The first result for “best hris” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best HRIS for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which human capital management platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade HRIS platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best HRIS for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a HRIS. What should we look at?”Negative“Which HRIS platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Workday HCMWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMWorkday HCMno first choiceagainst: Namely, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Three alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
HiBob, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProGPT-5.4 miniWorkday HCMWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMSAP SuccessFactorsno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProFive alternatives
ADP Enterprise HCM / Vantage HCM, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Dayforce, Workday HCMGemini 3.5 FlashWorkday HCMWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMWorkday HCMWorkday HCMagainst: BambooHR, Gustoagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, HiBob, Oracle PeopleSoft, Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP ERP HCM
Three alternatives
HiBob, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors HXMFive alternatives
Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProFive alternatives
ADP Lyric HCM, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors HXM, UKG ProThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Rippling, UKG ProFive alternatives
ADP Vantage, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsPerplexity SonarWorkday HCMagainst: RipplingWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMWorkday HCMno first choiceagainst: ADP, Oracle PeopleSoft, Paycor, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Five alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deel, Oracle Global HR Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, UKG ProGrok 4.1 FastWorkday HCMagainst: Paycor, RipplingWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMagainst: ADP Workforce NowOracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Workday HCMagainst: BambooHR, RipplingWorkday HCMagainst: BambooHR, HiBob, Ripplingagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, HR Cloud, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Three alternatives
Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsThree alternatives
Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProMistral SmallADP Workforce Now, HiBobWorkday HCMChangedOracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Workday HCMagainst: BambooHRno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, UKG Pro, Workday HCMno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Two alternatives
Remote, TransformifyTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsTwo alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, RipplingDeepSeek V4 FlashWorkday HCMWorkday HCMHeldagainst: ADP Vantage HCM, UKG ProWorkday HCMRipplingagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Six alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsFive alternatives
ADP Vantage HCM, ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Deel, UKG ProLlama 4 MaverickWorkday HCMWorkday HCMHeldno first choiceno first choiceHiBob, Personioagainst: Gusto
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, PaycorTwo alternatives
Darwinbox, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCMQwen 3.7 FlashWorkday HCMagainst: HiBob, RipplingWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMRipplingagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCMno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Gusto, Hummu, NetSuite OneWorld, Paycom, Personio, Rippling, TriNet, Zenefits
Three alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro/ReadyTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMKimi K2Workday HCMWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMDayforceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paylocity, RemoFirst, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProTwo alternatives
ADP Vantage HCM, UKG ProGLM 4.7 FlashXno first choiceWorkday HCMChangedSAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMWorkday HCMno first choiceagainst: Rippling
Three alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paycor, UKG ProFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactorsMiniMax M2.5no first choiceWorkday HCMChangedWorkday HCMno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP Vantage, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProGPT-6 LunaWorkday HCMWorkday HCMHeldno first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud HCMagainst: Workday HCMno first choiceagainst: Ripplingagainst: BambooHR, Legacy SAP ERP HCM
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsOne alternative
SAP SuccessFactorsMuse Glimmer 30BWorkday HCMWorkday HCMHeldWorkday HCMHR Cloud, IceHrm Proagainst: ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Personio, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, Namely, Paychex Flex, Zoho People
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG ProBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:30 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 12 | 59 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 15 | 69 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 25 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 15 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 24 | 97 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:13 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:32 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 17 | 72 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 19 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 19 | 68 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 3 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 19 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 11 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 22 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP Lyric read as ADP Lyric HCM
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce
Deel HR read as Deel
Microsoft Dynamics 365 HR read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Human Resources
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud (Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
PeopleSoft read as Oracle PeopleSoft
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday read as Workday HCM
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP Enterprise HCM / Vantage HCM
ADP Workforce
Cegid
Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (HCM)
Hummu
Infor HCM
Kingdee
Legacy SAP ERP HCM
Lyric
NetSuite OneWorld (HR)
Oracle Global HR Cloud
SAP ERP HCM
Yonyou
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.