AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Core HR and payroll › October 2026 Edition

HRIS and HCM platforms

Asked as “HRIS”, and as “human capital management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
26%
Contested · Zoho People 24%
26Rippling24Zoho People11HiBob39others

26% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▲+5Since September 2026: 22% → 28%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Rippling held the lead, +5 points on 22%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Rippling26%8%49accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 22% → 28%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 28%
02Zoho People24%0%13accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 23%
03HiBob11%0%34accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 15% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 13%
04BambooHR9%15%61accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 9%
05ADP Workforce Now7%17%42accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 15% → 2%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 2%
06Paylocity6%8%25accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
07Gusto4%24%34accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
08UKG Pro4%43%23criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
09Deel2%20%15accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
10Paycor2%20%15accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
11Workday HCM2%47%36criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12SAP SuccessFactors0%44%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
13Paycom0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Rippling26%
02Zoho People24%
03HiBob11%
04BambooHR9%
05ADP Workforce Now7%
06Paylocity6%
07Gusto4%
08UKG Pro4%
09Deel2%
10Paycor2%
11Workday HCM2%
12SAP SuccessFactors0%
13Paycom0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday HCM
47%
17 of 36 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Verdict:** Avoid if you have fewer than 500–1,000 employees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
UKG Pro
43%
10 of 23 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“**Highest Caution: UKG (formerly Ultimate Kronos Group)** ... **Who should avoid**: Smaller/mid-sized teams” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now
17%
7 of 42 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Poor customer support is the single most frequent complaint... pricing structure can be opaque with add-on fees” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
BambooHR
15%
9 of 61 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“it may not be the budget choice for a very small company: its Core plan is listed at $250/month for 25 or fewer employees” GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 970 links across 220 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · HiBob38 answers · 60 citations · 13 models
36 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Paycor23 answers · 23 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Lattice22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rippling21 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Deel21 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Paylocity19 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 18 citations · 12 models
16 answers · 22 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best hris”, “hris”, “hris platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Rippling rippling.com26%1260301,00017,886712,399$42,013115
Zoho parent site
Zoho People 24%
24%2776,60050
HiBob hibob.com11%33714,800154266,143$541206
BambooHR bamboohr.com9%108290,5005511,055,247$44,698106
ADP parent site
ADP Workforce Now 7%, ADP RUN 0%
7%5922,740,00023,897
Paylocity paylocity.com6%2721,220,0002,3801,682,033$8,493797
Gusto gusto.com4%870673,00010,5601,629,483118
UKG Pro ukg.com
UKG Pro 4%, UKG Ready 0%
4%45790,5001,257310,168$11,996120
Deel deel.com2%52640,5001,210307,175$330,608118
Paycor paycor.com2%228673,0001,8181,002,9001201

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com, hibob.com, paycor.com, paylocity.com). The first result for “best hris” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best HRIS for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which human capital management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top HRIS platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best HRIS for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a HRIS. What should we look at?”Negative“Which HRIS platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HiBob's Bob, Paylocity
Two alternativesBambooHR, Rippling
no first choiceChangedBambooHR
Eight alternativesADP Workforce Now, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Three alternativesDeel, Gusto, TriNet
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Paycom, TriNet, UKG Ready
GPT-5.4 miniRippling
Two alternativesBambooHR, HiBob
against: Workday HCM
UKG ProChanged
One alternativeADP Workforce Now
against: Workday HCM
no first choiceZoho People
Two alternativesGusto, HR Partner
against: BambooHR
no first choiceagainst: Deel, Rippling, VensureHR, Veriato
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
against: Workday HCM
HiBob, Paylocity, RipplingChanged
Two alternativesADP, BambooHR
no first choice
Seven alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Dayforce, Gusto, HiBob, Rippling, Workday HCM
TalentHR, Zoho People
Three alternativesConnecteam, Homebase, OnPay
against: Freshteam, Gusto
no first choice
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, HiBob, Rippling
against: Gusto, Workday HCM
against: ADP, Namely, Paycom, Rippling, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Perplexity SonarRippling
Two alternativesHiBob, Paylocity
against: BambooHR
BambooHRChanged
Five alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paycor, Rippling, Workday HCM
BambooHR
Six alternativesADP Workforce Now, Gusto, HiBob, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Gusto, Zoho Peopleagainst: BambooHRno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Gusto, Lattice, Namely, Paycom, Paycor, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Grok 4.1 FastRippling
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
BambooHRChanged
Two alternativesADP Workforce Now, Paycor
against: UKG Pro, Workday HCM
BambooHR, Rippling
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, Gusto, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Four alternativesBambooHR, Deel, Homebase, Rippling
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Gusto, Namely, Paycor, UKG Pro, Uzio, Workday HCM
Mistral SmallPaylocity, Workday HCM
One alternativeADP Workforce Now
HiBobChanged
Two alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR
against: Workday HCM
Workday HCM
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling
Zoho People
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, TalentHR
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, Paycor, SAP SuccessFactors, TriNet, Workday HCM
DeepSeek V4 FlashRippling
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
RipplingHeld
Two alternativesADP Workforce Now, Paylocity
against: BambooHR
no first choice
Ten alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, HiBob, Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
against: Deel
Zoho People
Two alternativesBambooHR, Gusto
no first choice
Eight alternativesADP, BambooHR, Deel, HiBob, Paycor, Paylocity, Rippling, UKG Pro
against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
against: ADP Workforce Now, Banner, Oracle EBS, Oracle PeopleSoft, Paychex Flex, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Llama 4 Maverickno first choicePaycorChanged
Four alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Paycom, Rippling
no first choiceGusto
Two alternativesKeka, Paychex Flex
no first choiceagainst: Namely
Qwen 3.7 FlashHiBob, Rippling
Two alternativesBambooHR, Paylocity
UKG ProChanged
Three alternativesDayforce, Gusto, HiBob
Workday HCM
Six alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro
Zoho People
Four alternativesConnecteam, Deel, Gusto, Homebase
against: BambooHR
BambooHR, Deel, Ripplingagainst: Dayforce, Gusto, Rippling Start, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCMagainst: ADP, Dayforce, IBM Peoplesoft, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex Flex, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro
Kimi K2Rippling
Three alternativesBambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
RipplingHeld
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Paycor
no first choice
Nine alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, GoCo, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, UKG Ready, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Five alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Homebase, IceHrm Pro, OrangeHRM
no first choiceagainst: Workday HCMagainst: ADP, Namely, Paylocity, UKG Pro
GLM 4.7 FlashXHiBob, Rippling
Two alternativesBambooHR, Paylocity
against: ADP Workforce Now, Gusto
ADP Workforce NowChanged
Two alternativesHiBob, Paycor
no first choice
Eight alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Personio, Rippling, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Four alternativesBambooHR, Eddy, Gusto, Rippling
no first choiceagainst: Gusto, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
MiniMax M2.5BambooHR, HiBobagainst: RipplingHiBob, RipplingChanged
Three alternativesBambooHR, Paylocity, UKG Pro
SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling
Zoho People
Two alternativesBambooHR, Rippling
no first choice
Four alternativesADP, BambooHR, Paycor, Rippling
against: Workday HCM
nothing named
GPT-6 LunaRippling
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, UKG Ready
ADP Workforce NowChanged
One alternativeUKG Ready
no first choice
Nine alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, HiBob, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Ready/UKG, Workday HCM
Zoho People
One alternativeGusto
against: BambooHR
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, SAP SuccessFactors
Muse Glimmer 30BADP Workforce Now
Four alternativesBambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity, Rippling
ADP Workforce NowHeld
Five alternativesBambooHR, Paycor, Sage HCM, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
BambooHR, Rippling
Seven alternativesADP Workforce Now, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
against: Justworks
Zoho People
Four alternativesADP RUN, Deel, Gusto, TalentHR
BambooHR
Two alternativesHiBob, Personio
against: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Rippling, UKG Pro, Workday HCM, Zenefits, now TriNet HR Platform
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:49yes99 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:08yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:14yes1858 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:38yes204 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:21yes2212 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:51yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:43yes2445 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:42yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:57yes521 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:39yes1019 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:09yes1963 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:49yes1021 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:29yes420 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:57yes1425 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:01no03 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:59yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:38yes1327 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:30yes197 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:39yes2211 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:54yes75 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:25yes2335 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:31yes54 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:19yes519 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:07yes1420 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:44yes1419 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:38yes522 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:21yes213 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:26yes1419 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:29yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:47yes108 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:40yes1222 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:18yes207 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:44yes2113 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:38yes107 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:34yes1932 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:14yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:05yes525 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:52yes1028 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:38yes2374 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:34yes2041 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:56yes1024 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:04yes1441 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:59yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:30yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:25yes2122 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:32yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:08yes147 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:51yes107 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:57yes1822 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:56yes54 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:01yes1037 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:48yes1523 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:11yes1374 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:49yes1031 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:43yes318 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:18yes1325 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:51yes189 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:46no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:49yes1127 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:45yes164 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:34yes1416 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:07no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:37yes2034 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:40yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:14no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:12yes1833 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:02no07 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:42yes527 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:52yes321 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:48yes1429 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:20yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:32yes45 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:58yes2026 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:09yes205 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:02yes2212 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:46yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:44yes2349 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:21yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:47no029 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:46yes2523 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:00yes2342 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:26no010 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:07yes318 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:54yes1422 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ceridian read as Dayforce
Deel HR read as Deel
HiBob HRIS read as HiBob
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Paychex read as Paychex Flex
PeopleSoft read as Oracle PeopleSoft
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
Run Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
WorkDay read as Workday HCM
Workday read as Workday HCM
Unresolved, counted raw
Banner
Grove HR
HiBob's Bob
IBM Peoplesoft
Rippling Start
Sage HCM
WaypointHR
Zenefits, now TriNet HR Platform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← HR complianceLeave →