AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Core HR and payroll › HRIS and HCM platforms › Small business › October 2026 Edition

HRIS and HCM platforms for small business buyers

Asked as “HRIS”, and as “human capital management platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · BambooHR 29%
32Gusto29BambooHR19Zoho People20others

32% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−9Since September 2026: 42% → 33%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Gusto held the lead, −9 points on 42%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Gusto32%3%69endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 42% → 33%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.42% → 33%
02BambooHR29%4%68accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 35% → 29%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.35% → 29%
03Zoho People19%4%23accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 16% → 17%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 17%
04Rippling14%16%57accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 5% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 13%
05Deel2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Workday HCM0%100%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09ADP Workforce Now0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
08ADP RUN0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
06Justworks0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
07HiBob0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Gusto32%
02BambooHR29%
03Zoho People19%
04Rippling14%
05Deel2%
06Justworks0%
07HiBob0%
08ADP RUN0%
09ADP Workforce Now0%
10Workday HCM0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday HCM
100%
13 of 13 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“large, enterprise-grade HRIS platforms (like Workday, Dayforce, or ADP Workforce Now) would be expensive, overly complex, and a nightmare to implement” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Rippling
16%
9 of 57 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“**Rippling** is powerful, but the cited small-business pricing ... can be less budget-friendly than leaner alternatives” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
ADP Workforce Now
50%
6 of 12 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Not ideal for small businesses... smaller businesses will likely pay enterprise prices for features they won't use” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
100%
6 of 6 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Enterprise-Level Systems (e.g., Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM, UKG Pro)” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 950 links across 180 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

42 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
39 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
34 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · HiBob32 answers · 48 citations · 12 models
29 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lattice26 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rippling23 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Gusto23 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ADP22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Paycor18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Paychex16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best hris”, “hris”, “hris platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Gusto gusto.com
Gusto 32%, Gusto Simple 0%
32%870673,00010,5601,629,483118
BambooHR bamboohr.com29%108290,5005511,055,247$44,698106
Zoho parent site
Zoho People 19%
19%2776,60050
Rippling rippling.com14%1260301,00017,886712,399$42,013115
TalentHR talenthr.io3%47480189,83132
Deel deel.com2%52640,5001,210307,175$330,608118
Factorial factorialhr.com2%12327,100304,748141,4091
Justworks justworks.com0%28260,500452236,868$2,424120
HiBob hibob.com0%33714,800154266,143$541206
Personio personio.com0%1062,40037224,863

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (adp.com, forbes.com, hibob.com, paychex.com, paycor.com). The first result for “best hris” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best HRIS for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which human capital management platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top HRIS platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best HRIS for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a HRIS. What should we look at?”Negative“Which HRIS platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Gusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Rippling, Zoho People
BambooHR, GustoChanged
Three alternativesEddy, Justworks, Rippling
BambooHR, Gusto
Three alternativesDeel, HiBob, Rippling
Zoho People
Three alternativesGusto, Justworks, TriNet
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Gusto, Rippling, UKG Ready, Workday HCM, Zoho People
GPT-5.4 miniBambooHR
Three alternativesGusto, HiBob, Rippling
BambooHRHeld
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, Gusto, Rippling
against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Gusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Justworks, Rippling
Zoho People
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Notion
no first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling
Four alternativesBambooHR, Deel, Gusto, Justworks
RipplingHeld
Two alternativesBambooHR, Gusto
Gusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Deel, Rippling
Deel, TalentHR
Three alternativesGusto, Homebase, Zoho People
BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling
One alternativeJustworks
against: ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, Workday HCM
against: ADP, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex Flex, Paycom, Paylocity, QuickBooks Payroll, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Perplexity SonarGusto
Two alternativesADP, BambooHR
BambooHRChanged
Three alternativesGusto, Paycor, Rippling
Gusto
Four alternativesBambooHR, HiBob, Justworks, Paychex Flex
against: Rippling
Zoho People
Two alternativesGusto, OnPay
against: Rippling
no first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Deel, GoCo, Oyster, Rippling, Workable
Grok 4.1 FastGusto
Two alternativesBambooHR, Rippling
BambooHRChanged
Two alternativesGusto, Rippling
BambooHR, Gusto
Three alternativesADP RUN, Paychex Flex, Rippling
Zoho People
Two alternativesGusto, Rippling
no first choiceagainst: ADP RUN, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex Flex, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Mistral SmallBambooHR, GustoBambooHRChanged
Two alternativesGusto, Paycor
no first choiceGusto, Zoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Workday HCMagainst: Namely, Paychex Flex
DeepSeek V4 FlashBambooHR, Gusto
One alternativeRippling
RipplingChanged
Two alternativesBambooHR, Gusto
against: ADP Workforce Now, Paycor
Gusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Rippling, Zenefits
Factorial, Zoho People
Three alternativesADP RUN, BambooHR, Rippling
BambooHR, Gusto
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, Factorial, Rippling, Zoho People
against: Workday HCM
against: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paycom, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choice
Two alternativesGusto, Rippling
BambooHR, Gustonothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashGusto
Two alternativesBambooHR, Rippling
RipplingChanged
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Justworks
against: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors
BambooHR, Gusto
Two alternativesRippling, Zoho People
Gusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Rippling, Zoho People
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Kimi K2Gusto
Two alternativesBambooHR, Rippling
RipplingChanged
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Justworks
Factorial, Gusto
Three alternativesADP RUN, BambooHR, Rippling
Zoho People
Two alternativesBambooHR, Gusto
no first choiceagainst: ADP, BambooHR, Paychex Flex, Rippling
GLM 4.7 FlashXBambooHR, Gusto
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Rippling
RipplingChanged
Two alternativesBambooHR, Gusto
BambooHR, Gusto
Five alternativesADP RUN, Namely, Rippling, Sage HR, Zoho People
Zoho People
Three alternativesFirstHR, GoCo, Gusto
against: Rippling
BambooHR, Gustoagainst: Lattice HRIS
MiniMax M2.5BambooHR, Gusto
One alternativeADP
BambooHR, GustoHeld
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, Paycom, Sage HR
BambooHR
Five alternativesGusto, HiBob, OnPay, Personio, Rippling
TalentHR, Zoho People
One alternativeBambooHR
no first choiceagainst: ADP, Paycor, Workday HCM
GPT-6 LunaGusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Deel, Rippling
GustoHeld
One alternativeBambooHR
BambooHR, Gusto
Four alternativesDeel, Justworks, Rippling, Zoho People
Zoho People
Two alternativesConnecteam, Gusto Simple
no first choiceagainst: ADP RUN, BambooHR, Rippling, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Muse Glimmer 30BBambooHR, Rippling
Two alternativesGusto, Zoho People
BambooHRChanged
Two alternativesGusto, Rippling
BambooHR, Gusto
One alternativeRippling
Zoho People
Three alternativesADP RUN, BambooHR, Gusto
no first choice
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Rippling
against: ADP RUN, ADP Workforce Now, Namely, Paychex Flex, Paycor, QuickBooks Payroll, Workday HCM
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:01yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:49yes54 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:00yes818 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:26yes204 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:13yes1911 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:19yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:08yes1723 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:49yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:03no031 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:49yes1016 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:21yes1421 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:39yes513 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:27yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:34yes1220 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:08yes188 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:23yes44 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:19yes520 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:28yes193 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:12yes238 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:48yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:23yes2326 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:15yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:17no032 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:53yes1423 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:50yes2560 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:58yes824 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:53yes28 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:17yes1421 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:11yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:00yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:15yes1662 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:10yes206 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:41yes2011 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:45yes107 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:51yes2452 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:28yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:43yes531 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:41yes917 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:52yes20107 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:14yes1520 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:11yes618 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:33yes1425 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:46yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:54no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:15yes1350 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:43yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:38yes179 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:12yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:41yes921 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:48yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:05no027 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:00yes1119 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:01yes2473 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:20yes820 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:17yes313 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:34yes1420 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:51no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:07no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:45yes1127 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:09yes207 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:07yes209 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:26no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:11yes1635 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:40yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:24yes525 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:04yes1018 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:46yes1722 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:27yes512 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:04yes312 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:57no04 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:41yes1510 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:49no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:47yes2227 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:57yes184 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:12yes1914 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:16yes189 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:36yes2429 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:28yes51 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:25yes922 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:39yes2324 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:16yes2495 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:40yes2225 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:06yes423 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:32yes2144 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ceridian (Dayforce) read as Dayforce
Deel HR read as Deel
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Paychex read as Paychex Flex
Paychex (Flex) read as Paychex Flex
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
Run Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday read as Workday HCM
Unresolved, counted raw
KrispCall
Lattice HRIS
Workday mid-size
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← HR complianceLeave →