Leave and absence management
Asked as “leave management software”, and as “PTO tracking tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · LeaveBoard 14%
28BambooHR14LeaveBoard12Vacation Tracker46others
28% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.BambooHR held the lead, ±0 points on 28%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vacation Tracker23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Vacation Tracker (24%) replaces Timetastic (25% then, 10% now), 14 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
BambooHR28%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Workday38%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 37% → 40%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Vacation Tracker23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Vacation Tracker (24%) replaces Timetastic (25% then, 10% now), 14 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketBambooHR28%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseWorkday38%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 37% → 40%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01BambooHR28%17%47accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 29%
BambooHR28%17%47accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 29%02
LeaveBoard14%0%25accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 12%
LeaveBoard14%0%25accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 12%03Vacation Tracker12%21%34accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 13% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 12%
Vacation Tracker12%21%34accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 13% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 12%04
Rippling11%8%26accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 13% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 12%
Rippling11%8%26accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 13% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 12%05
Timetastic4%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%
Timetastic4%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%06
Factorial4%17%12accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Factorial4%17%12accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07
UKG Pro2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
UKG Pro2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
ADP Workforce Now2%29%17criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
ADP Workforce Now2%29%17criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Leave Dates0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Leave Dates0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Gusto0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Gusto0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12Workday0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Workday0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Zoho People0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Zoho People0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Calamari0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Calamari0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
AbsenceSoft0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AbsenceSoft0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
BambooHR vs TimetasticBambooHR vs FactorialBambooHR vs UKG ProBambooHR vs ADP Workforce NowLeaveBoard vs Vacation TrackerLeaveBoard vs RipplingLeaveBoard vs TimetasticLeaveBoard vs FactorialLeaveBoard vs UKG ProLeaveBoard vs ADP Workforce NowVacation Tracker vs RipplingVacation Tracker vs TimetasticVacation Tracker vs FactorialVacation Tracker vs UKG ProVacation Tracker vs ADP Workforce NowRippling vs TimetasticRippling vs FactorialRippling vs UKG ProRippling vs ADP Workforce NowTimetastic vs FactorialTimetastic vs UKG ProTimetastic vs ADP Workforce NowFactorial vs UKG ProFactorial vs ADP Workforce NowUKG Pro vs ADP Workforce Now
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01BambooHR28%
BambooHR28%02LeaveBoard14%
LeaveBoard14%03Vacation Tracker12%
Vacation Tracker12%04Rippling11%
Rippling11%05Timetastic4%
Timetastic4%06Factorial4%
Factorial4%07UKG Pro2%
UKG Pro2%08ADP Workforce Now2%
ADP Workforce Now2%09Zoho People0%
Zoho People0%10Calamari0%
Calamari0%11AbsenceSoft0%
AbsenceSoft0%12Workday0%
Workday0%13Gusto0%
Gusto0%14Leave Dates0%
Leave Dates0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BambooHR17%
8 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid "All-in-One" HR software (like BambooHR or Gusto) for just leave management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Vacation Tracker21%
7 of 34 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Criticized for its pricing model, which adds extra fees for "advanced features" that are typically included for free in other tools.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now29%
5 of 17 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“While generally reliable, users report: Frequent forced password changes ... Slow, unresponsive support” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Gusto25%
3 of 12 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid "All-in-One" HR software (like BambooHR or Gusto) for just leave management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1036 links across 201 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
40 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · actiPLANS33 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow30 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Leapsome21 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 55 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Vacation Tracker17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best leave management software”, “leave management software”, “leave management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 28% | 1082 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 |
| LeaveBoard leaveboard.com | 14% | 58 | 720 | 0 | 110,901 | ||
| Vacation Tracker vacationtracker.io | 12% | 86 | 2,400 | 49 | 30,775 | 7 | |
| Rippling rippling.com | 11% | 1260 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 |
| HiBob hibob.com | 7% | 337 | 14,800 | 154 | 266,143 | $54 | 120 |
| Timetastic timetastic.co.uk | 4% | 45 | 1,000 | 8 | 114,719 | 3 | |
| Factorial factorialhr.com | 4% | 123 | 27,100 | 304,748 | 141,409 | 1 | |
| actiPLANS actiplans.com | 4% | 21 | 90 | 0 | 6,660 | ||
| Float float.com | 4% | 20 | 60,500 | 177,387 | 38,659 | 12 | |
| UKG Pro ukg.com | 2% | 457 | 90,500 | 1,257 | 310,168 | $11,996 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best leave management software” is vendordirectory.shrm.org.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best leave management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which PTO tracking tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top leave management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best leave management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a leave management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which leave management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5RipplingBambooHRChangedVacation TrackerTimetasticno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Deputy, Factorial, Leave Dates, Replicon, Teamdeck.io, Timetastic
Three alternatives
BambooHR, HROne, NamelyThree alternatives
Buddy Punch, Factorial, Vacation TrackerThirteen alternatives
AbsenceSoft, BambooHR, Connecteam, Day Off, Dayforce, Deel, Flamingo, JJ Keller Leave Manager, Rippling, Time Off Manager 365, Timetastic, UKG Pro, WorkdayThree alternatives
Connecteam, TalentHR, Time Off Manager 365GPT-5.4 miniRipplingBambooHRChangedSparrowOfflowno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
AbsenceSoft, BambooHR, NamelyTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingFive alternatives
ADP Total Absence Management, AbsenceSoft, BambooHR, Dayforce, WorkdayTwo alternatives
Vacation Tracker, absentifyGemini 3.5 FlashHiBob, RipplingVacation TrackerChangedBambooHRAbsencano first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Google Sheets, Guardian, Gusto, Lincoln Financial Group, MetLife, Microsoft Excel, Paylocity, Rippling, Sparrow, Unum
Four alternatives
Calamari, Cocoon, Tilt, Vacation TrackerThree alternatives
Calamari, Float, RipplingFive alternatives
AbsenceSoft, Gusto, Teamsense, Timetastic, Vacation TrackerFive alternatives
Homebase, Jibble, LeaveBoard, Timetastic, Vacation TrackerPerplexity SonarRipplingFactorial, Vacation TrackerChangedno first choiceLeaveBoardno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BambooHR, Zoho PeopleOne alternative
LeapsomeTwo alternatives
Leave Dates, TimetasticGrok 4.1 FastADP Workforce Now, BambooHRagainst: UKG ProBambooHRChangedno first choiceLeaveBoard, TalentHRagainst: Clockify, Connecteam, Homebase, Leave Dates, Vacation TrackerBambooHR, UKG Proagainst: Deel, Paycom, Rippling, Vacation Tracker
Three alternatives
AbsenceSoft, HiBob, Vacation TrackerOne alternative
Vacation TrackerThree alternatives
BambooHR, Calamari, RipplingOne alternative
ADP Workforce NowMistral SmallBambooHR, HiBobDeel, FactorialChangedno first choiceVacation Trackerno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, Vacation Tracker
Two alternatives
LeaveBoard, Vacation TrackerOne alternative
Vacation TrackerTwo alternatives
Leave Dates, LeaveBoardDeepSeek V4 FlashBambooHRBambooHRHeldBambooHRLeaveBoardno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Replicon, Tilt, Time Off Cloud, Vacation Tracker, Workday
Two alternatives
Deel, RipplingFour alternatives
Factorial, Rippling, Vacation Tracker, Zoho PeopleFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BrightHR, Gusto, Zoho People, e-daysThree alternatives
Clockify, Leave Dates, TalentHRLlama 4 MaverickVacation TrackerPTO ExchangeChangedno first choiceVacation Trackerno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now
Two alternatives
Namely, TimeOff.ManagementThree alternatives
Gusto, Leave Dates, LeaveBoardQwen 3.7 FlashBambooHRRipplingChangedno first choiceLeaveBoard, Timetasticagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, Vacation Trackerno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Absence Management, SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: ADP, Asana, ClickUp, Dolibarr, Excel, Google Sheets, Jira, Monday.com, Odoo, QuickBooks Time, SuiteCRM, Trello, Workday
Five alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deel, Remote, Rippling, UKG ReadyFour alternatives
Deputy, Factorial, LeaveBoard, When I WorkFour alternatives
Deputy, LeaveBoard, Workday, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
Connecteam, TalentHRKimi K2HiBobFloat, RipplingChangedno first choiceagainst: NamelyLeaveBoard, actiPLANSagainst: BambooHRno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Vacation Tracker
Four alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Leapsome, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Deputy, PaycorSeven alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Bueggio HR, Calamari, Gusto, LeaveBoard, WorkdayTwo alternatives
Vacation Tracker, Zoho PeopleGLM 4.7 FlashXBambooHRBambooHRHeldno first choiceVacation Trackeragainst: BambooHRno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Cezanne HR, Gusto, Leave Dates, SAP SuccessFactors, Vacation Tracker, Workday
Three alternatives
Dayforce, Rippling, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Deputy, GustoFive alternatives
BambooHR, Deel, LeaveBoard, Rippling, actiPLANSFour alternatives
Calamari, LeaveBoard, Time Off Manager 365, Zoho PeopleMiniMax M2.5BambooHRBambooHR, FloatChangedBambooHR, WorkdayLeaveBoardBambooHRagainst: Factorial, Tilt
Three alternatives
Rippling, TimeOff.Management, e-daysTwo alternatives
Paycor, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
Leave Dates, LeaveBoard, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Leave Dates, TalentHRThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro, WorkdayGPT-6 LunaTiltVacation TrackerChangedno first choiceLeaveBoardno first choiceagainst: BambooHR
Two alternatives
AbsenceSoft, SparrowOne alternative
BambooHREight alternatives
ADP Total Absence Management, AbsenceSoft, BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, Sparrow, UKG Pro, WorkdayOne alternative
Zoho PeopleMuse Glimmer 30BBambooHR, HiBobBambooHRChangedZoho PeopleLeaveBoard, actiPLANSno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR
Three alternatives
Rippling, Vacation Tracker, e-daysThree alternatives
Float, Rippling, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Sage HRThree alternatives
Homebase, Leave Dates, Vacation TrackerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 22 | 53 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 12 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:29 | yes | 25 | 73 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 24 | 114 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 7 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 23 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 9 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:52 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 18 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:10 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 17 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel HR read as Deel
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Absence Management
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Absence Management
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday HCM read as Workday
Unresolved, counted raw
AI SoloHR
Boozt
Bueggio HR
Five Employee Portal
Guardian
HRCloud
Lincoln Financial Group
Microsoft Excel
Mitratech Leave
Offlow
PTO Exchange
SuiteCRM
Teamdeck.io
VacationTracker
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.