AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Empower Retirement · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Empower Retirement

88Judge labels
7First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in 401(k) providers for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Empower Retirement →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In 401(k) providers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Empower Retirement for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
401(k) providersCompensation and total rewards7%6 of 780%38accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Empower Retirement yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Empower Retirement across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500303
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02204
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX03104
MiniMax M2.502103
GPT-6 Luna11103
Muse Glimmer 30B21003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels2
Paraphrase17 labels3
Comparative28 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid-market B2B firms typically land on Fidelity or Empower for service/flexibility” Muse Glimmer 30B · 401(k) providers · direct prompt · first choice
“Empower Retirement - best for flexibility and negotiated pricing for mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · 401(k) providers · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If it is Fidelity, Vanguard, Schwab, or Empower, you are in safe territory” Qwen 3.7 Flash · 401(k) providers · negative prompt · first choice
“Empower stands out for mid-sized B2B companies” Kimi K2 · 401(k) providers · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Empower Retirement, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Empower Retirement was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Charles Schwab20 of 880Not among the top eight
T. Rowe Price18 of 880Not among the top eight
Principal Financial Group12 of 880Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Empower Retirement. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 88 answers that named Empower Retirement and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spotsaas.com52
adp.com42
forbes.com41
goldenwealthcapital.com30
uschamber.com29
myshortlister.com27
aol.com24
basiccapital.com23
fitsmallbusiness.com23
betterment.com22

313 of the 313 domain citations in answers naming Empower Retirement came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

empower.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Empower Retirement takes 7% of first choices and Human Interest takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “401(k) provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “401(k) providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
246,000 a month (“empower retirement”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,060 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,954,551 a month
Searches its site ranks for
106,577 · 10,242 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,655
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $105 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
115+ ads · 93 video, 17 image, 5 text · 53 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2026, as Personal Capital Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 115 in the year. 5 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 6 of 78 in 401(k) providers
Segment leader
20%
Human Interest
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
88 answers
Its own site cited
in 84 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on empower.com
2,211
subdomains included
Content
547
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press377undated
Glossary or explainer5912026-10-01
Blog38undated
Comparison2722026-10-02
Template or tool26undated
Report or ebook1512026-10-02
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Podcast or video2undated
Conference or event1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page empower.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Empower Retirement

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Empower Retirement; a claim can dispute any of them.
Empower 26Empower (formerly TD Ameritrade/Pearl) 1

Follow Empower Retirement

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Empower Retirement is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Invest well. Live a little.™
Certifications
FINRASIPC
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Empower Retirement's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: empower.com, empower.com/plan-sponsors/solutions/marc-pension-administration-system. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Empower Retirement's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Empower Retirement, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Empower Retirement by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Empower Retirement is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Empower Retirement, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at empower.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.