HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › EvalFlow · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

EvalFlow

9Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EvalFlow was named 4 times in Performance management and 1 other category, where Lattice led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EvalFlow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	22 of 60	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	0%	48 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EvalFlow yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EvalFlow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A modern, AI-assisted platform that includes reviews, goal tracking, and continuous feedback” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · budget prompt · alternative

“EvalFlow ($6/user/month) is another strong contender” Kimi K2 · Performance management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EvalFlow, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EvalFlow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice8 of 92Not in the top three

BambooHR6 of 90Not in the top three

Culture Amp5 of 91Not in the top three

Teamflect5 of 91Not in the top three

15Five5 of 90Not in the top three

Effy AI4 of 92Not in the top three

Betterworks4 of 90Not in the top three

PerformYard4 of 90Not in the top three

Leapsome3 of 90Not in the top three

Qualtrics3 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EvalFlow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 9 answers that named EvalFlow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

evalflow.comYour site7

effy.ai5

betterworks.com3

feedbackpulse.com3

workhuman.com3

capterra.com2

eletive.com2

forbes.com2

guideflow.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

Twenty-four of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming EvalFlow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

effy.ai/blog/performance-management-software-for-small-business3

evalflow.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-for-20263

evalflow.com/blog/what-is-the-best-employee-performance-management-software-for-small-busi3

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools2

capterra.com/resources/best-performance-management-software-small-business-reviews-analysi2

effy.ai/blog/360-feedback-software2

eletive.com/blog/360-feedback-tools2

feedbackpulse.com/resources/360-feedback-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EvalFlow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EvalFlow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at evalflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.