Every category where a model named SugarOKR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	2%	14 of 54	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SugarOKR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SugarOKR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with SugarOKR if your team is any size and you want free/unlimited—it's the lowest risk” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have absolutely $0 budget and want unlimited users: Use SugarOKR.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SugarOKR, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SugarOKR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tability11 of 134Not in the top three

OKRs Tool10 of 131Not in the top three

Weekdone7 of 132Not in the top three

Perdoo7 of 131Not in the top three

Teamflect5 of 131Not in the top three

Mooncamp5 of 130Not in the top three

Asana3 of 131Not in the top three

ClickUp2 of 130Not in the top three

Google Sheets2 of 130Not in the top three

Notion2 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SugarOKR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named SugarOKR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

okrstool.com12

tability.io11

mooncamp.com9

toolradar.com6

firsthr.app5

asana.com3

g2.com3

gartner.com3

leapsome.com3

topickz.com3

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming SugarOKR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools9

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software8

okrstool.com/blog/okr-tools-for-small-businesses6

toolradar.com/guides/best-okr-software6

firsthr.app/compare/performance/okr-software5

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software5

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise5

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software-goal-setting4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SugarOKR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SugarOKR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sugarokr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.