Pay equity
Asked as “pay equity analysis software”, and as “pay transparency compliance tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
12%
Contested · Syndio 12%
12PayAnalytics12Syndio11Payscale64others
12% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Syndio held the lead, −4 points on 17%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Gusto31%Contested▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Syndio12%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseSyndio62%Clear leader▲+8Since September 2026: 53% → 62%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Gusto31%Contested▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketSyndio12%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseSyndio62%Clear leader▲+8Since September 2026: 53% → 62%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Syndio12%27%45criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 13%
Syndio12%27%45criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 13%02
PayAnalytics12%4%24accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 11%
PayAnalytics12%4%24accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 11%03
Payscale11%0%35accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 9%
Payscale11%0%35accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 9%04
Figures7%7%15accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%
Figures7%7%15accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%05
Workleap Compensation7%23%13accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 9%
Workleap Compensation7%23%13accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 9%06
Pave5%19%16accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%
Pave5%19%16accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%07
Trusaic PayParity4%29%38criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
Trusaic PayParity4%29%38criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%08
Aeqium4%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Aeqium4%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%09
beqom Pay Equity4%45%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
beqom Pay Equity4%45%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%10
OpenComp2%0%12accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%
OpenComp2%0%12accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Compport0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Compport0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Salary.com Pay Equity0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Salary.com Pay Equity0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Affirmity0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Affirmity0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Ravio0%0%13accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Ravio0%0%13accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Syndio vs Workleap CompensationSyndio vs PaveSyndio vs Trusaic PayParitySyndio vs AeqiumPayAnalytics vs PayscalePayAnalytics vs FiguresPayAnalytics vs Workleap CompensationPayAnalytics vs PavePayAnalytics vs Trusaic PayParityPayAnalytics vs AeqiumPayscale vs FiguresPayscale vs Workleap CompensationPayscale vs PavePayscale vs Trusaic PayParityPayscale vs AeqiumFigures vs Workleap CompensationFigures vs PaveFigures vs Trusaic PayParityFigures vs AeqiumWorkleap Compensation vs PaveWorkleap Compensation vs Trusaic PayParityWorkleap Compensation vs AeqiumPave vs Trusaic PayParityPave vs AeqiumTrusaic PayParity vs Aeqium
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Syndio12%
Syndio12%02PayAnalytics12%
PayAnalytics12%03Payscale11%
Payscale11%04Figures7%
Figures7%05Workleap Compensation7%
Workleap Compensation7%06Pave5%
Pave5%07Trusaic PayParity4%
Trusaic PayParity4%08Aeqium4%
Aeqium4%09beqom Pay Equity4%
beqom Pay Equity4%10OpenComp2%
OpenComp2%11Ravio0%
Ravio0%12Affirmity0%
Affirmity0%13Salary.com Pay Equity0%
Salary.com Pay Equity0%14Compport0%
Compport0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Syndio27%
12 of 45 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Small businesses should avoid enterprise-grade, complex tools like Syndio that demand dedicated rewards staff and quote-based pricing.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Trusaic PayParity29%
11 of 38 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Enterprise-focused with quote-only pricing; ... overkill for most small companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
beqom Pay Equity45%
9 of 20 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Enterprise statistical audit giants (e.g., **Syndio, Beqom, Trusaic**) are highly robust but typically require custom enterprise contracts and significant implementation effort.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Deel Compensation/Pay Equity60%
3 of 5 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Lesser-known or smaller tools (e.g., Barley, Deel) may lack the depth required for enterprise-level analysis.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1026 links across 143 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 46 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
60 answers · 95 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Effy51 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow34 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Gartner28 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Trusaic27 answers · 43 citations · 14 models
vendor site · G224 answers · 35 citations · 8 models
23 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Skima18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
51 answers · 12 models
50 answers · 12 models
39 answers · 12 models
37 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best pay equity analysis software”, “pay equity analysis software”, “pay equity tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syndio syndio.com | 12% | 146 | 1,000 | 15 | ||||
| PayAnalytics payanalytics.com | 12% | 63 | 20 | 0 | 1,025 | 8 | 6 | |
| Payscale payscale.com | 11% | 229 | 9,900 | 299 | 1,408,989 | $26 | 33 | |
| Gusto gusto.com | 9% | 870 | 673,000 | 10,560 | 1,629,483 | 118 | ||
| Figures figures.hr | 7% | 73 | 90,500 | 269,511 | 3,710 | |||
| CompUp compup.io | 7% | 50 | 40 | 2 | 3,016 | |||
| Workleap workleap.com Workleap Compensation 7% | 7% | 38 | 10 | 0 | 67,808 company | $740 | 6 | 7 |
| Pave pave.com | 5% | 213 | 27,100 | 28,423 | 7,645 | $91 | 7 | |
| Trusaic trusaic.com Trusaic PayParity 4% | 4% | 110 | 4,187 company | 10 | 3 | |||
| Aeqium aeqium.com | 4% | 42 | 260 | 0 | 366 | 7 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, gartner.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, synd.io, trusaic.com). The first result for “best pay equity analysis software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best pay equity analysis software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which pay transparency compliance tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top pay equity tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best pay equity analysis software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a pay equity analysis software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which pay equity tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Workleap CompensationWorkleap CompensationHeldSyndioOpenCompno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
Compport, OpenComp, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Syndio, Trusaic PayParityFive alternatives
Compport, HiBob, Payscale, Syndio, SysarbSix alternatives
Compport, OpenComp, Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquityThree alternatives
EEOPay, PayAnalytics, QueueGPT-5.4 miniSyndioPayscaleChangedagainst: Workday Pay EquityTrusaic PayParityagainst: Deel PayrollLiveRemagainst: PayAnalytics, Salary.com Pay Equityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParityOne alternative
Salary.com Pay EquityFour alternatives
Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, Syndio, Workday Pay EquityOne alternative
OpenCompGemini 3.5 FlashPayAnalyticsPaveChangedagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Pay EquitySyndio, Trusaic PayParityCompUpagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquityPayAnalyticsagainst: Syndionothing named
Four alternatives
CandorIQ, Pequity, Syndio, Trusaic PayParityFour alternatives
OpenComp, PayAnalytics, Ravio, Workleap CompensationSix alternatives
Affirmity, DCI Consulting, Figures, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Salary.com Pay EquityFour alternatives
Lattice u2019s Free Compensation Analysis Template, OpenComp, Pave, RavioFour alternatives
Compport, Payscale, Ravio, Trusaic PayParityPerplexity SonarAeqiumagainst: beqom Pay EquityPayscaleChangedSyndio, Trusaic PayParityagainst: ADP DataCloud, EEOPay, Workday Pay EquityCompUp, Parity Softwareno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
HiBob, Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, Workleap CompensationTwo alternatives
Keka, RavioFour alternatives
Affirmity, Figures, PayAnalytics, beqom Pay EquityOne alternative
Salary.com Pay EquityGrok 4.1 FastWorkleap CompensationPayscaleChangedno first choiceGustoagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityno first choiceagainst: Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, Equity.com, Massachusetts Equal Pay Act calculators, Pave, Workleap Compensation
Three alternatives
Aeqium, HiBob, PayscaleThree alternatives
OpenComp, Syndio, Trusaic PayParityFour alternatives
Comprehensive.io, HRSoft, Pave, PayscaleFive alternatives
Compease, PayEQ, Payscale, Syndio, VisierMistral SmallAeqiumSyndioChangedno first choiceGustono first choiceagainst: Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, Equity.com, Massachusetts Equal Pay Act Tool, Pave, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, Workleap Compensation
Two alternatives
Sysarb, Workleap CompensationTwo alternatives
Figures, PihrDeepSeek V4 FlashPayAnalyticsFigures, SyndioChangedSyndio, Trusaic PayParityGusto, Parity Softwareagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityPayAnalyticsagainst: Trusaic PayParityagainst: Aeqium, Figures, Syndio, beqom Pay Equity
Three alternatives
Compport, Payscale, SyndioOne alternative
SysarbThree alternatives
Affirmity, Sysarb, beqom Pay EquityThree alternatives
CompUp, Pave, PayscaleFour alternatives
Figures, Lattice Compensate, Ravio, SyndioLlama 4 MaverickWorkleap CompensationCompUpChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Compport, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Two alternatives
Affirmity, EffyFour alternatives
BetterComp, Figures, Ravio, Trusaic PayParityQwen 3.7 FlashPaveagainst: VisierSysarbChangedSyndioPave, SalaryCubeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Payscale, Phodata, Workleap CompensationFour alternatives
BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, SyndioThree alternatives
Affirmity, SalaryCube, Trusaic PayParityTwo alternatives
Excel, OpenCompFour alternatives
Chart, CompUp, Pave, PayscaleKimi K2PayAnalytics, SyndioFigures, PayscaleChangedSyndio, Trusaic PayParityagainst: ADP DataCloud, Coda, CompensationXLGustono first choiceagainst: Coda, CompensationXL
Two alternatives
Payscale, Trusaic PayParityTwo alternatives
BetterComp, RavioTwo alternatives
PayAnalytics, PayscaleThree alternatives
OpenComp, PayAnalytics, PayscaleGLM 4.7 FlashXSyndioTrusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquityChangedPayAnalyticsGusto, OpenComp Market Pulseno first choiceagainst: Massachusetts Equal Pay Act Tool, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Ten alternatives
Aeqium, Affirmity, Compport, Figures, HiBob, Pave, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Workday Pay Equity, beqom Pay EquityFive alternatives
BetterComp, Figures, KPMG Pay Transparency Tool, Payscale, RavioTwo alternatives
Pave, RadfordFour alternatives
Compport, Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, Lattice Compensate, Salary.com CompAnalystMiniMax M2.5HiBobagainst: CompLogixFigures, SyndioChangedagainst: BambooHR, beqom Pay EquitySyndioSalaryCubeagainst: Affirmity, Syndio, Trusaic PayParityno first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Four alternatives
Aeqium, Pave, Payscale, Workleap CompensationTwo alternatives
PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParityFour alternatives
Comprehensive.io, Pave, Payscale, RavioGPT-6 LunaPayscalePayscaleHeldSyndioEquityPathagainst: PayReviewno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Syndio, Trusaic PayParityOne alternative
PaveFive alternatives
Affirmity, Mercer Pay Equity, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Trusaic PayParityOne alternative
PayEquity.aiMuse Glimmer 30BPayAnalytics, beqom Pay EquityFiguresChangedPayscale, SyndioCompUpagainst: Aeqium, Compease, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquityPayAnalytics, Syndio, Trusaic PayParityagainst: Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, Equity.com, Massachusetts Equal Pay Act Tool, Pave, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, Workleap Compensation, beqom Pay Equity
Two alternatives
Syndio, Trusaic PayParityTwo alternatives
Ravio, Trusaic PayParityFour alternatives
Compport, Figures, Gapsquare, now XpertHR Gapsquare, PayfactorsOne alternative
Parity SoftwareBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 13 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 19 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 20 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 16 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 18 | 60 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 16 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 22 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 21 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 11 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 18 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:41 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 19 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 8 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:59 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 4 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 15 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 16 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP DataCloud
Affirmity PayStat read as Affirmity
Barley read as Workleap Compensation
Barley (Workleap) read as Workleap Compensation
Beqom read as beqom Pay Equity
CompAnalyst (Salary.com) read as Salary.com CompAnalyst
Comprehensive read as Comprehensive.io
Deel read as Deel Compensation/Pay Equity
Deel Services read as Deel Compensation/Pay Equity
Lattice read as Lattice Compensate
Lattice (Compensation Add-on) read as Lattice Compensate
Payscale Ascent read as Payscale
Payscale Ascent (formerly Payfactors) read as Payscale
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
Salary.com read as Salary.com Pay Equity
Salary.com (CompAnalyst) read as Salary.com Pay Equity
Syndio PayEQ read as Syndio
Trusaic read as Trusaic PayParity
Trusaic (PayParity) read as Trusaic PayParity
Workday read as Workday Pay Equity
Workday HCM read as Workday Pay Equity
Workleap read as Workleap Compensation
Workleap Barley read as Workleap Compensation
beqom read as beqom Pay Equity
beqom PaySuite read as beqom Pay Equity
Unresolved, counted raw
Chart
DCI Consulting (EEOPay)
DCI EEOPay
Gapsquare, now XpertHR Gapsquare
KPMG Pay Transparency Tool
KPMG's Pay Transparency Tool (PTT)
Lattice
u2019s Free Compensation Analysis Template
LiveRem
Massachusetts Equal Pay Act calculators
PayReview
Phodata
SAP SuccessFactors Pay Equity
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.