AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › October 2026 Edition

Contingent workforce management

Asked as “vendor management system for contingent workers”, and as “freelancer management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
16%
Contested · Worksuite 14%
16VectorVMS14Worksuite12SimplifyVMS58others

16% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: VectorVMS (16%) replaces SimpleVMS (35% then, 4% now), 12 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.VectorVMS leads at 16%, replacing SimpleVMS, which led at 35% and stands at 4% now: 12 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01VectorVMS16%4%23accepted challenger▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 16%
02Worksuite14%0%27accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 12%
03SimplifyVMS12%0%23accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 12%
04Beeline9%40%48criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
05Deel7%11%18accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 8%
06Worksome7%6%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
07Conexis VMS7%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 8%
08Magnit5%24%21accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
09Workday VNDLY2%23%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
10Upwork2%30%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
11SAP Fieldglass2%57%44criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Fiverr0%27%15criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01VectorVMS16%
02Worksuite14%
03SimplifyVMS12%
04Beeline9%
05Deel7%
06Worksome7%
07Conexis VMS7%
08Magnit5%
09Workday VNDLY2%
10Upwork2%
11SAP Fieldglass2%
12Fiverr0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Fieldglass
57%
25 of 44 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“traditional enterprise solutions (like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Workday VNDLY) are usually not viable options” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Beeline
40%
19 of 48 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“legacy VMS platforms are notoriously slow and difficult to navigate... Avoid if: Your organization has fewer than 500 contingent workers” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Upwork
30%
7 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid Entirely for Enterprise Use:** - **Upwork, Fiverr, Toptal** – These platforms are generally not recommended for core enterprise workforce needs.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Workday VNDLY
23%
6 of 26 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“traditional enterprise solutions (like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Workday VNDLY) are usually not viable options” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1076 links across 259 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 26 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

32 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 43 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · TalentDesk20 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Beeline18 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Spendflo16 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ramp16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vendor management system for contingent workers”, “contingent workforce platforms”, “vendor management system for contingent workers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
VectorVMS pixid.com16%60390131177
Worksuite worksuite.com14%5988058,941
SimplifyVMS simplifyvms.com12%5021069955
Beeline beeline.com9%14527,1001,44319,910$5354
Deel deel.com
Deel 7%, Deel HR 2%
9%52640,5001,210307,175$330,608118
Worksome worksome.com7%4088071,22624
Conexis conexisvmssoftware.com
Conexis VMS 7%
7%305001,153 company02
Magnit magnitglobal.com5%599,90082713,89301
SimpleVMS simplevms.com5%262,90003,19902
TalentDesk.io talentdesk.io4%232002,38440

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com, ramp.com). The first result for “best vendor management system for contingent workers” is magnitglobal.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best vendor management system for contingent workers for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which freelancer management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top contingent workforce platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vendor management system for contingent workers for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a vendor management system for contingent workers. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contingent workforce platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Worksuite
Two alternativesBeeline, SimpleVMS
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
TalentDesk.io, WorksomeChanged
Two alternativesDeel HR, Upwork
no first choice
Four alternativesRemote, Rippling, TalentDesk.io, Worksuite
SimpleVMS
Three alternativesBeeline, Bridge VMS, Conexis VMS
no first choiceagainst: Amazon, DoorDash, Grubhub, Handy, Instacart, Instawork, Lyft, Postmates, Qwick, Tend, Uber
GPT-5.4 miniBeeline
Three alternativesConexis VMS, SAP Fieldglass, SourceNow
WorksomeChanged
One alternativeDeel
no first choiceVendorapp
One alternativeSimpleVMS
against: symplr Contingent Talent Management
no first choiceagainst: ISNetworld, SAP Fieldglass, VectorVMS, symplr Contingent Talent Management
Gemini 3.5 FlashVectorVMS
Three alternativesConexis VMS, Workday VNDLY, Worksuite
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
WorksuiteChanged
Four alternativesBubty, Deel Contractor, TalentDesk.io, Worksome
no first choice
Eleven alternativesBeeline, Deel, Fiverr, Magnit, Papaya Global, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork, WorkMarket, Workday VNDLY, Worksome, Worksuite
Conexis VMS
Three alternativesDeel, StaffingNation, TalentDesk.io
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
Conexis VMS, TalentDesk.io, Worksuite
Four alternativesDeel, Oyster, Rippling, Workday VNDLY
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
against: Beeline, Deel, Field Nation, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Papaya Global, Remote, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork, WorkMarket
Perplexity SonarWorkday VNDLY
One alternativeBeeline
YunoJunoChanged
One alternativeWorksome
no first choiceVectorVMS
One alternativePrecoro
against: Connecteam
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastMagnit
Four alternativesConexis VMS, SimpleVMS, SimplifyVMS, Worksuite
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork
UpworkChanged
Five alternativesDeel, Fiverr, Remote, Toptal, Worksuite
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesDeel, Upwork, Workforce Logiq
Conexis VMS
One alternativeSimpleVMS
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
no first choice
Four alternativesBeeline, Conexis VMS, Vector VMS, Workday Contingent Workforce
against: SAP Fieldglass
against: Beeline, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork, Workday VNDLY
Mistral SmallSAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesSimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
DeelChanged
Three alternativesFiverr, Upwork, WorkMarket
no first choice
One alternativePontoon Solutions
VectorVMS
One alternativeField Nation
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork
DeepSeek V4 FlashVectorVMS
Three alternativesSimpleVMS, SimplifyVMS, Worksuite
against: Beeline, Magnit
DeelChanged
One alternativeWorksome
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesDeel, SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: Magnit
Conexis VMS
Three alternativesField Nation, SimpleVMS, VectorVMS
against: Beeline, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
Magnit, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
One alternativeWorkday VNDLY
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
against: Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Upwork
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceField Nation
Three alternativesBeeline, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashSimplifyVMS
Two alternativesMagnit, VectorVMS
against: SAP, ServiceNow
WorksuiteChanged
One alternativeDeel Hire
no first choice
Six alternativesAdecco Group, ManpowerGroup, Plutox, Randstad, Sapling Solutions, Veritinga
SimplifyVMS, StaffingCorner
One alternativeVectorVMS
against: SAP Fieldglass
Beeline, Magnit, SimplifyVMS
Five alternativesADP Flex, Contra, TalentDesk.io, Upwork, Workday VNDLY
against: SAP Fieldglass
against: Adecco Group, Ceridian Brassring, ManpowerGroup, Randstad, SAP Fieldglass
Kimi K2Beeline
Three alternativesSimplifyVMS, VectorVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Deel, WorksomeChanged
Two alternativesFiverr, TalentDesk.io
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesDeel, Magnit, Remote, Workday VNDLY
SimpleVMS
Four alternativesConcord, Harvest, Ironclad, Toggl Track
against: Beeline, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
no first choice
One alternativeConexis VMS
against: Arise Virtual Solutions, Freelancer.com, Handy Technologies / Angi Services, Upwork
GLM 4.7 FlashXVectorVMS
Three alternativesMagnit, SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
DeelChanged
One alternativeFiverr
Worksome
Seven alternativesBeeline, Conexis VMS, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Deel HR, SAP Fieldglass, Wand, Workday VNDLY
VectorVMS
Two alternativesBridge VMS, SimplifyVMS
no first choiceagainst: Deel, Papaya Global, SAP Fieldglass, WorkMarket, Workday VNDLY
MiniMax M2.5SimplifyVMS, WorksuiteWorksuiteChanged
Two alternativesRemote, Upwork
Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesBeeline, Deel, Ivalua, Workday
against: Upwork
Deel HR, VectorVMS
Three alternativesRamp, SimplifyVMS, Worksome
SimplifyVMS
Six alternativesBeeline, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Magnit, Ramp, VectorVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: Magnit, WorkMarket, Worksome
GPT-6 LunaBeeline
Two alternativesWorkday VNDLY, Worksuite
against: SAP Fieldglass
WorksuiteChanged
One alternativeRemote
SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
Three alternativesBeeline, Magnit, VectorVMS
Beeline
One alternativeWorksuite
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BSimpleVMS, SimplifyVMS
Three alternativesBeeline, Worksome VMS, Worksuite
against: Beeline, IQNavigator, SAP Fieldglass
Worksome, WorksuiteChanged
Three alternativesDeel, Fiverr, Upwork
SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesBeeline, Coupa Contingent Workforce, IQNavigator
VectorVMS
Two alternativesConexis VMS, SimplifyVMS
against: Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, CareRev, Clipboard Health, Gigpro, Instawork, SAP Fieldglass, ShiftKey, ShiftMed
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:46yes189 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:19yes58 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:03yes1626 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:44yes193 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:56yes2217 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:19yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:09yes2029 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:00yes76 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:07yes519 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:27yes1931 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:02yes1687 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:52yes522 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:54yes427 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:58yes2125 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:05yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:54yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:01yes1023 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:05yes153 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:42yes248 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:03yes128 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:39yes2021 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:55yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:00yes925 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:18yes925 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:52yes1986 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:23yes917 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:34yes213 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:01yes1324 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:00yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:02yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:35yes1925 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:57yes176 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:55yes169 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:02yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:34yes2046 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:52yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:56no045 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:16yes2325 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:49yes2441 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:59yes1422 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:50yes621 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:27yes2351 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:44yes177 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:29yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:39yes2819 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:58yes153 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:10yes229 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:49yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:51yes2333 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:18yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:28yes2364 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:03yes1935 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:07yes13103 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:29yes1424 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:47yes317 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:15yes2431 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:15no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:45no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:29yes1028 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:15yes145 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:38yes199 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:39no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:57yes2334 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:32yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:02yes1441 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:00yes1018 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:10yes1426 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:17yes521 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:09yes219 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:23yes1421 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:36yes187 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:19yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:25yes1320 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:29yes152 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:30yes2210 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:44yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:16yes2531 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:55yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:55no031 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:31yes2427 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:49yes2584 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:52yes2328 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:34yes016 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:22yes2532 s

Noise floor in this category

Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.

ShowHide
Claude Haiku 4.5
3 of 3 flipped
GPT-5.4 mini
1 of 3 flipped
Gemini 3.5 Flash
2 of 4 flipped
Perplexity Sonar
1 of 4 flipped
Grok 4.1 Fast
4 of 5 flipped
Mistral Small
4 of 4 flipped
DeepSeek V4 Flash
5 of 5 flipped
Llama 4 Maverick
3 of 3 flipped
Qwen 3.7 Flash
4 of 4 flipped
Kimi K2
5 of 6 flipped
GLM 4.7 FlashX
4 of 4 flipped
MiniMax M2.5
4 of 5 flipped
GPT-6 Luna
3 of 4 flipped
Muse Glimmer 30B
2 of 4 flipped

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Avature read as Avature VMS
Conexis read as Conexis VMS
Coupa read as Coupa Contingent Workforce
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
TalentDesk read as TalentDesk.io
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP FlexJobs / Workforce Compliance
Advantage Workforce Services LLC
CEIPAL
CareRev
Ceridian Brassring
Clipboard Health
CloudSourcing
Comet
Concord
Contraction
Coupa Vendor Manager One
Gigpro
Handy (now Angi Services)
Handy Technologies / Angi Services
ISNetworld
Ironclad
Medefis
MyGig
Odin
Plutox
Postmates
ProUnite
Sapling Solutions
ShiftKey
ShiftMed
ShiftWise/Flex
SourceNow
StaffingCorner
StaffingNation (by TCWGlobal)
Summa Workforce
TAPFIN
Tend
Vector VMS
Vendorapp
Veritinga (formerly Accruent)
Workforce Logic
Worksome VMS
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Pay equityEmployee monitoring →