AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Contingent workforce man › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Contingent workforce management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “vendor management system for contingent workers”, and as “freelancer management platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
42%
Clear leader
42SAP Fieldglass17Beeline07WorkMarket34others

42% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 39% → 41%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.SAP Fieldglass held the lead, +2 points on 39%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01SAP Fieldglass42%18%61endorsed leader▲+2Since September 2026: 39% → 41%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.39% → 41%
02Beeline17%18%55accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 18% → 14%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 14%
03Workday VNDLY7%6%36accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 8%
04Worksuite7%0%13accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 8%
05Magnit5%6%31accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
06SimplifyVMS5%6%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
07Upwork3%52%23criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
08Fiverr2%53%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Deel0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
09Coupa Contingent Workforce0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01SAP Fieldglass42%
02Beeline17%
03Workday VNDLY7%
04Worksuite7%
05Magnit5%
06SimplifyVMS5%
07Upwork3%
08Fiverr2%
09Coupa Contingent Workforce0%
10Deel0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Beeline
18%
10 of 55 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Beeline during the MBO Partners integration... I'd ask for specific commitments on product roadmap, support ownership, integrations, data migration” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
SAP Fieldglass
18%
11 of 61 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“**Caveat**: Uses **quote-only, volume-based pricing** tied to your spend under management. This makes total cost *less predictable*” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Fiverr
53%
9 of 17 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Explicitly noted for having "heavy IP transfer" issues and security gaps that make it unsuitable for managing a secure corporate contingent workforce.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Upwork
52%
12 of 23 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Primarily a marketplace model that lacks the automated workflow, compliance auditing, and spend management controls required by large corporations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

81 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1181 links across 302 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 26 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

35 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Beeline27 answers · 41 citations · 13 models
26 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TalentDesk24 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SAP19 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Venn18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 26 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vendor management system for contingent workers”, “contingent workforce platforms”, “vendor management system for contingent workers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
SAP parent site
SAP Fieldglass 42%
42%149135,00074,309
Beeline beeline.com
Beeline 17%, IQNavigator 0%
17%14527,1001,44319,910$5354
Workday parent site
Workday VNDLY 7%
7%881,220,00023,848
Worksuite worksuite.com7%5988058,941
WorkMarket workmarket.com7%2212,10015411,877
Magnit magnitglobal.com
Magnit 5%, Magnit Global 0%
5%599,90082713,89301
SimplifyVMS simplifyvms.com5%5021069955
Upwork upwork.com3%163368,0004,8782,719,519$456114
Worksome worksome.com2%4088071,22624
Ivalua ivalua.com2%223,6008735,51580

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com, sap.com, venn.com). The first result for “best vendor management system for contingent workers” is magnitglobal.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best vendor management system for contingent workers for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which freelancer management platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade contingent workforce platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vendor management system for contingent workers for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a vendor management system for contingent workers. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contingent workforce platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesBeeline, Magnit, Workday VNDLY
WorksuiteChanged
Three alternativesBeeline, TalentDesk.io, WorkMarket
SAP Fieldglass
Eight alternativesBeeline, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Deel, Remote, Rippling, Workday Contingent Worker Management, Worksome, Worksuite
Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
One alternativeBeeline
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniBeeline, SAP Fieldglass
One alternativeMagnit
WorksomeChanged
One alternativeDeel
Beeline, Magnit, SAP Fieldglassagainst: Oracle, WorkdayBeeline
Two alternativesMagnit, SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceagainst: Flentis, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
Gemini 3.5 FlashBeeline, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
One alternativeMagnit
WorksuiteChanged
Four alternativesDeel, Fiverr, WorkMarket, Worksome
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesCoupa Contingent Workforce, Magnit, Workday VNDLY
Workday VNDLY
One alternativeBeeline
against: SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceagainst: Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Upwork
Perplexity SonarSAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesBeeline, Flextrack, Ivalua, Workday VNDLY
WorksuiteChanged
Three alternativesUpwork, WorkMarket, Worksome
SAP Fieldglass
Five alternativesBeeline, Guidant Global, Ivalua, Magnit, VectorVMS
SAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesBeeline, Workday VNDLY
against: VectorVMS
no first choiceagainst: Manatal, Zoho Recruit
Grok 4.1 FastSAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesBeeline, PRO Unlimited, VectorVMS
against: Paylocity, Upwork
WorkMarketChanged
Two alternativesFiverr, Upwork
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesMagnit, PRO Unlimited, Workday VNDLY
SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesBeeline, Magnit, SimplifyVMS
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork, Workday VNDLY
Mistral SmallSAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesFlextrack, Magnit, Workday VNDLY
FiverrChanged
Two alternativesWorkMarket, Worksuite
SAP Fieldglass
Five alternativesBeeline, Catalant, Toptal, Upwork, Workday VNDLY
against: Coupa Contingent Workforce, Ivalua, Jaggaer
SAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesSimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork
DeepSeek V4 FlashSAP Fieldglass
Five alternativesBeeline, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Ivalua, Magnit Global, Workday VNDLY
WorksuiteChanged
One alternativeDeel
against: Upwork
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesMagnit, Workday VNDLY
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesMagnit, SimplifyVMS
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Gopuff, SAP Fieldglass, TaskRabbit, Upwork
Llama 4 MaverickSAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesFlextrack, Magnit, Workday VNDLY
UpworkChanged
Three alternativesFiverr, WorkMarket, Worksuite
no first choiceSAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLYno first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork
Qwen 3.7 FlashSAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesOracle Fusion, Workday Contingent Workforce
WorkMarketChanged
Three alternativesUpwork, Worksome, Worksuite
no first choiceSAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS
Two alternativesWNS ActiveVMS, Workday VNDLY
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork
Kimi K2SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesBeeline, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Magnit, Workday VNDLY
SAP FieldglassHeld
Two alternativesADP WorkMarket, Beeline
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesCoupa Contingent Workforce, Magnit Global, Workday VNDLY
Workday VNDLYagainst: SAP FieldglassMagnit, SimplifyVMS
Three alternativesBeeline, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
against: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork
GLM 4.7 FlashXBeeline, SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesMagnit, Wand, Workday VNDLY, Worksuite
WorkMarketChanged
One alternativeUpwork
SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesBeeline, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Deel HR, Workday VNDLY
Ivalua, SAP Fieldglass
One alternativeBeeline
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Bullhorn, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Zoho Recruit
MiniMax M2.5Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesFlextrack, Pixid
Upwork, WorkMarketChanged
Two alternativesFiverr, Worksuite
Beeline, SAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesDeel, Magnit
Beeline, VectorVMS
Two alternativesBridge VMS, SimplifyVMS
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork
GPT-6 LunaBeeline, SAP Fieldglass
One alternativeWorkday VNDLY
BeelineChanged
Two alternativesSAP Fieldglass, Worksuite
Beeline, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLYBeeline
Two alternativesSAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Deel, Insight Global
Muse Glimmer 30BSAP Fieldglass
Two alternativesBeeline, Workday VNDLY
SAP FieldglassHeld
One alternativeADP WorkMarket
SAP Fieldglass Contingent Workforce Management
Six alternativesBeeline VMS, Coupa Contingent Workforce, IQNavigator, Magnit, PRO Unlimited, Workday VNDLY
Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Three alternativesBeeline, SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
no first choiceagainst: Beeline, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork, Workday, Workday VNDLY
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:30yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:28yes47 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:50yes1523 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:30yes203 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:30yes2510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:36yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:56yes2442 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:24yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:37yes2095 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:28yes1526 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:30yes2158 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:09yes1017 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:15yes420 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:01yes1432 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:38yes189 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:15yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:29yes2425 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:50yes172 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:54yes1812 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:02yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:08yes1932 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:42yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:02yes824 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:43yes1917 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:10yes2549 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:15yes514 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:59yes414 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:27yes2136 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:05yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:51yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:56yes1928 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:39yes155 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:24yes239 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:00yes1515 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:08yes2344 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:36yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:00no044 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:08yes1726 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:23yes2160 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:38yes2248 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:52yes422 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:10yes1340 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:28yes1810 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:05yes28 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:59yes2232 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:40yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:39yes229 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:21yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:56yes2143 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:33yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:43yes528 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:51yes2029 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:33yes2330 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:10yes1941 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:06yes418 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:26yes2246 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:50yes3621 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:02yes511 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:31yes1028 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:38yes145 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:39yes1910 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:28no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:45yes2452 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:47yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:16yes1047 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:20yes1825 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:20yes2034 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:11no058 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:20yes331 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:01yes2449 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:59yes2713 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:57yes28 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:50yes1527 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:47yes153 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:22yes248 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:13yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:14yes2562 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:24yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:00yes532 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:19yes2423 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:58yes2474 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:47yes1844 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:01yes426 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:30yes2042 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conexis read as Conexis VMS
Coupa read as Coupa Contingent Workforce
Freelancer read as Freelancer.com
TalentDesk read as TalentDesk.io
Unresolved, counted raw
Accela
AgileOne
Eqip
FieldNation (by Skilable)
Flentis
Gopuff
Guidant Global
IQN
IQNav
Kroll
Pixid
Pontoon
Procyon
SAP Fieldglass Contingent Workforce Management
Staffingtec
Vectrus
Verisource
WNS ActiveVMS
WorkPerfect
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Pay equityEmployee monitoring →