Workforce planning
Asked as “workforce planning software”, and as “headcount planning tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Homebase 12%
37ChartHop12Homebase09Abacum42others
37% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.ChartHop held the lead, +8 points on 31%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ChartHop31%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: ChartHop (33%) replaces Homebase (22% then, 17% now), 17 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop37%Contested▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Anaplan43%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
ChartHop31%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: ChartHop (33%) replaces Homebase (22% then, 17% now), 17 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop37%Contested▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseAnaplan43%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01ChartHop37%5%39endorsed leader▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 39%
ChartHop37%5%39endorsed leader▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 39%02
Homebase12%0%10accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 12%
Homebase12%0%10accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 12%03
Abacum9%8%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
Abacum9%8%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%04
Workday Adaptive Planning5%25%36criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 6%
Workday Adaptive Planning5%25%36criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 6%05
TeamOhana5%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
TeamOhana5%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%06
Planful5%7%15accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%
Planful5%7%15accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%07
HiBob5%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
HiBob5%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%08
Rippling4%10%29accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 4%
Rippling4%10%29accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 4%09
Paylocity4%0%18accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Paylocity4%0%18accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%10
Visier2%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Visier2%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Anaplan0%48%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Anaplan0%48%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Orgvue0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Orgvue0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Pigment0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Pigment0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Vena0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Vena0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs TeamOhanaChartHop vs PlanfulChartHop vs HiBobChartHop vs RipplingHomebase vs AbacumHomebase vs Workday Adaptive PlanningHomebase vs TeamOhanaHomebase vs PlanfulHomebase vs HiBobHomebase vs RipplingAbacum vs Workday Adaptive PlanningAbacum vs TeamOhanaAbacum vs PlanfulAbacum vs HiBobAbacum vs RipplingWorkday Adaptive Planning vs TeamOhanaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PlanfulWorkday Adaptive Planning vs HiBobWorkday Adaptive Planning vs RipplingTeamOhana vs PlanfulTeamOhana vs HiBobTeamOhana vs RipplingPlanful vs HiBobPlanful vs RipplingHiBob vs Rippling
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ChartHop37%
ChartHop37%02Homebase12%
Homebase12%03Abacum9%
Abacum9%04Workday Adaptive Planning5%
Workday Adaptive Planning5%05TeamOhana5%
TeamOhana5%06Planful5%
Planful5%07HiBob5%
HiBob5%08Rippling4%
Rippling4%09Paylocity4%
Paylocity4%10Visier2%
Visier2%11Pigment0%
Pigment0%12Vena0%
Vena0%13Orgvue0%
Orgvue0%14SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%15Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan48%
20 of 42 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“avoid enterprise options like Anaplan ($50K+/year) that overkill for your scale” Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning25%
9 of 36 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid** jumping straight to enterprise platforms like ... **Workday Adaptive Planning**” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning38%
5 of 13 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“**What to be cautious about:** Embedded planning tools within massive ERPs like **SAP SuccessFactors**, **Oracle HCM**, or **NetSuite**.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now44%
4 of 9 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Generic workforce planning and HR platforms such as Workday, ADP Workforce Now, SAP SuccessFactors, and Oracle HCM were intentionally excluded for professional services use cases” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1001 links across 224 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Guideflow52 answers · 64 citations · 11 models
39 answers · 50 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FirstHR23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Intervue20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rework19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Rippling16 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 10 models
32 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 6 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce planning software”, “workforce planning software”, “workforce planning tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartHop charthop.com | 37% | 365 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Homebase joinhomebase.com | 12% | 404 | 201,000 | 3,839 | 472,253 | $793 | 120 | |
| Abacum abacum.ai | 9% | 18 | 1,300 | 18 | 79,014 | $26 | 16 | |
| Workday parent site Workday Adaptive Planning 5% | 5% | 126 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| TeamOhana teamohana.com | 5% | 40 | 320 | 4 | 470 | 4 | ||
| Planful planful.com | 5% | 23 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| HiBob hibob.com | 5% | 337 | 14,800 | 154 | 266,143 | $54 | 120 | |
| Rippling rippling.com | 4% | 1260 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | 6 |
| Paylocity paylocity.com | 4% | 272 | 1,220,000 | 2,380 | 1,682,033 | $8,493 | 79 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho People 4% | 4% | 277 | 6,600 | 50 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cubesoftware.com, g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, rippling.com, softwarefinder.com). The first result for “best workforce planning software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce planning software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which headcount planning tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top workforce planning tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce planning software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a workforce planning software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce planning tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, HiBobPaylocityChangedAnaplanLeapsome, OrgChart, Plandayagainst: ERPNextno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Anaplan, BambooHR, Orgvue, Planful, Spreadsheets, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workforce.com
Three alternatives
Paylocity, Planful, VisierTwo alternatives
ChartHop, PigmentSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Cube, Deel HR, Paylocity, Rippling, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Deel HRGPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive PlanningHeldWorkday Adaptive PlanningRipplingno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Anaplan, HiBob, RipplingFive alternatives
Anaplan, ChartHop, Lattice, Mosaic, PigmentSix alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Oracle Workforce Planning, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro, VisierSix alternatives
Calamari, Gusto, OnTheClock, When I Work, Workday Adaptive Planning, Zoho PeopleGemini 3.5 FlashChartHopagainst: Anaplan, BambooHR, Workday Adaptive PlanningChartHopHeldagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningOrgvueagainst: AnaplanChartHopagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planningagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Seven alternatives
Aleph, Cube, Lative, Mosaic, Pigment, Runn, TeamOhanaFour alternatives
Abacum, Pigment, Rippling, TeamOhanaSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Dayforce, Pigment, Rippling, UKG Pro, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Agentnoon, Airtable, Connecteam, Homebase, Resource Guru, Runn, SlingEight alternatives
CandorIQ, ChartHop, Cube, Orgvue, Pigment, Rippling’s Headcount Planning module, TeamOhana, VenaPerplexity SonarPaylocityChartHopChangedagainst: BambooHRAnaplanConnecteamagainst: BambooHRno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Drivetrain, HiBob, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Paylocity, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
ChartHop, Deel Workforce Planning, Planday, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
GoCo, LeapsomeGrok 4.1 FastHiBob, Ripplingagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningChartHopChangedagainst: AnaplanRipplingHomebaseno first choiceagainst: Abacum, Anaplan, BambooHR, Deel Workforce Planning, Rippling, Spreadsheets
One alternative
ChartHopThree alternatives
Pigment, Rippling, TeamOhanaFive alternatives
Anaplan, Fuel50, HiBob, IBM Planning Analytics, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Google Sheets/Excel templates, When I Work, Zoho PeopleMistral SmallChartHopChartHopHeldno first choiceagainst: IBM Planning AnalyticsHomebaseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Paylocity, VisierTwo alternatives
Abacum, VisierTwo alternatives
Shifton, When I WorkDeepSeek V4 FlashAbacum, Planfulagainst: AnaplanAbacum, ChartHopChangedagainst: Anaplan, Orgvue, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceHomebase, Zoho Peopleagainst: ChartHopChartHopagainst: Anaplan, Orgvueagainst: Anaplan, Deel Workforce Planning, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, PlanfulNine alternatives
Anaplan, ChartHop, Dayforce, Rippling, Runn, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Connecteam, When I WorkFive alternatives
Abacum, HiBob, Paylocity, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceChartHopChangedDeel HRLeapsomeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Paylocity, TeamOhanaOne alternative
NextivaOne alternative
Workforce.comQwen 3.7 FlashChartHopChartHopHeldWorkdayChartHop, Homebaseagainst: Anaplan, Visierno first choiceagainst: ChartMuggers, IBM, Luminate, NetSuite, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
Three alternatives
Planful, Rippling, VisierFour alternatives
Crest, Float, QuotaPath, RipplingFour alternatives
Fuel50, Rippling, Runn, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningFour alternatives
Deputy, Excel or Google Sheets, Keka, Zoho PeopleKimi K2ChartHopChartHopHeldagainst: Anaplan, Orgvue, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive PlanningHomebaseagainst: DeputyChartHopagainst: Anaplanagainst: Anaplan, ChartHop, Excel/Google Sheets, Float, HiBob, Keka, Rippling
Four alternatives
Abacum, Paylocity, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Pigment, Rippling, TeamOhanaFive alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Workforce Modeling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, eResource SchedulerThree alternatives
Connecteam, When I Work, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
Paylocity, RipplingGLM 4.7 FlashXChartHopChartHopHeldno first choiceZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Nowagainst: Excel
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Paylocity, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Rippling, TeamOhanaFour alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, RipplingMiniMax M2.5HiBobTeamOhanaChangedagainst: Anaplanno first choiceHomebaseAbacum, Planful, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Paylocity, RipplingTwo alternatives
Cube, PigmentSix alternatives
Anaplan, Careerminds, Rippling, UKG Pro, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Keka, When I WorkGPT-6 LunaTeamOhanaTeamOhanaHeldOrgvueHomebaseno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Jirav, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Anaplan, NICE Workforce Management, Pigment, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
ConnecteamMuse Glimmer 30BAbacum, Planfulagainst: AnaplanAbacum, ChartHopChangedagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce PlanningChartHopagainst: Anaplan, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Quinyx, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday
Five alternatives
ChartHop, Paylocity, Vena, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Planful, Rippling, VisierSeven alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics with Watson, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Oracle Workforce Modeling, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningFour alternatives
Homebase, Rippling, When I Work, Zoho PeopleBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:21 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 21 | 72 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 11 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:22 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 23 | 75 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:52 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:05 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:35 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 24 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel read as Deel Workforce Planning
HiBob HRIS read as HiBob
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Careerminds
ChartMuggers
Crest
ERPNext
Excel or Google Sheets Templates
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson
Luminate (formerly Cornerstone OnDemand)
NetSuite
Oracle Cloud HCM – Workforce Planning
Platoon
Rippling’s Headcount Planning module
SAP SuccessFactors HCM Suite
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.