AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › October 2026 Edition

Org charts and org design

Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · draw.io 11%
30ChartHop11draw.io09Organimi49others

30% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▲+4Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.ChartHop held the lead, +4 points on 27%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01ChartHop30%6%48endorsed leader▲+4Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 30%
02Organimi9%5%43accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 17% → 4%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 4%
03Pingboard8%8%36accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%
04Creately8%33%24criticized challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 9%
05OrgChart6%15%26accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 7%
06OneDirectory6%9%11accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 7%
07Functionly4%7%15accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
08Lucidchart2%39%57criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
09Canva2%40%15criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
10SmartDraw2%46%24criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
11Miro2%43%30criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
12Microsoft Visio2%58%36criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13The Org0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ChartHop30%
02Organimi9%
03Pingboard8%
04Creately8%
05OrgChart6%
06OneDirectory6%
07Functionly4%
08Lucidchart2%
09Canva2%
10SmartDraw2%
11Miro2%
12Microsoft Visio2%
13The Org0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Visio
58%
21 of 36 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Static diagramming tools such as ... Visio, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word ... produce a snapshot that must be edited by hand” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Lucidchart
39%
22 of 57 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Static diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, Visio, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word when they are used as the primary org-chart system” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Miro
43%
13 of 30 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Static diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, Visio, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word when they are used as the primary org-chart system” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
SmartDraw
46%
11 of 24 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Static diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, Visio, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 912 links across 157 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 32 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

34 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FirstHR33 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OneDirectory28 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
27 answers · 48 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Creately26 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · The Org24 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · MuchSkills18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TeamOhana17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G216 answers · 24 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
ChartHop charthop.com30%3652,900166,2380
draw.io drawio.com11%3890,5001,096141,930
Organimi organimi.com9%1101,300758,69971
Pingboard pingboard.com8%902,4002265
Creately creately.com8%822,400797,895383,44637
OrgChart orgchartstudio.com
OrgChart 6%, Org Chart Studio 0%
6%7833,1005428
OneDirectory onedirectory.com6%4317003,4681
Functionly functionly.com4%241,300045,7700
Lucidchart lucid.co2%15974,000878684,398$3131209
OrgChartHub orgcharthub.com2%6

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (creately.com, theorg.com, theorgchart.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top org chart tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5OneDirectory
Three alternativesLucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi
Lucidchart, Miro, OrgChartChanged
Four alternatives15Five, Ally, Lattice, Microsoft Visio
no first choiceCreately, draw.io
Three alternativesGliffy, Microsoft Visio Plan 1, Organimi
against: Canva
no first choiceagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Organimi, Personio, Sift, SmartDraw
GPT-5.4 miniChartHop
Two alternativesOrgChart, Pingboard
OrgChartChanged
Two alternativesNakisa Workforce Planning, Orgvue
no first choice
Four alternativesMicrosoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Canva
One alternativeLucidchart
against: Microsoft Visio
no first choiceagainst: OrgChart, The Org
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop
Five alternativesHiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro
ChartHopHeld
Three alternativesFunctionly, Lucidchart, TeamOhana
against: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio
ChartHop
Six alternativesBeyond Intranet, Lucidchart, OneDirectory, Organimi, Pingboard, TeamOhana
against: Microsoft Visio
Deel
Three alternativesCanva, Google Sheets, Organimi
no first choice
Six alternativesChartHop, Creately Atlas, Organimi, Pingboard, Sift, TeamOhana
against: Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro
against: BambooHR, Creately, Excel, Lattice, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Microsoft Word, Miro, Whimsical
Perplexity SonarOrgChart
Three alternativesLucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi
ChartHopChanged
Three alternativesFunctionly, Pingboard, Workday
Lucidchart
Six alternativesFunctionly, Microsoft Visio, OneDirectory, Organimi, Pingboard, TeamOhana
Creately, Organimi
One alternativeLucidchart
against: SmartDraw
no first choiceagainst: Creately, Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Microsoft Word, Miro, SmartDraw
Grok 4.1 FastPingboard
Two alternativesLucidchart, Organimi
against: Microsoft Visio, SAP SuccessFactors
ChartHopChanged
Three alternativesFunctionly, Orgvue, Pingboard
against: Lucidchart
Lucidchart
Five alternativesChartHop, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard
draw.io
Five alternativesCanva, Creately, Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi
OneDirectory
Four alternativesFunctionly, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart, Organimi
against: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio
against: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Monday.com, Organimi, SmartDraw, The Org
Mistral SmallOrgChartHub, Pingboard
Three alternativesArbor, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi
ChartHopChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Visio, OrgChart
Lucidchart
Four alternativesChartHop, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Organimi
draw.io
Three alternativesCreately, Org Chart Studio, Organimi
no first choiceagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop
Four alternativesLucidchart, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org
ChartHopHeld
Three alternativesCreately, Functionly, Organimi
against: Lucidchart, Orgvue, Workday
ChartHop
Five alternativesLucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard, The Org
against: Creately, Microsoft Visio, SmartDraw
draw.io
Five alternativesCanva, Creately, Google Sheets, Google Slides, Organimi
against: Lucidchart
no first choiceagainst: Lucidchartagainst: Creately, Excel, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgWeaver, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceChartHop, FunctionlyChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Visio, SmartDrawOneDirectory
Four alternativesChartHop, Jostle, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
against: Canva, Lucidchart, OneDirectory
Qwen 3.7 FlashLuminal
Four alternativesBambooHR, BetterU, Lucidchart, Rippling
ChartHopChanged
Three alternativesFunctionly, Lucidchart, Miro
against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
ChartHop
Five alternativesLucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Creately, draw.io
Two alternativesExcel, Google Sheets
against: Lucidchart
no first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miroagainst: Canva, Functionly, Google Drawings, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Wondershare
Kimi K2Pingboard
Three alternativesChartHop, Lucidchart, Organimi
FunctionlyChanged
Two alternativesCreately, Orgvue
against: Nakisa Org Design Suite
Lucidchart
Six alternativesChartHop, Happeo, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw
OrgWeaver
Four alternativesCanva, Connecteam, Lucidchart, Organimi
against: ChartHop, Pingboard
no first choiceagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Miroagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Pingboard, SmartDraw
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop
Three alternativesBambooHR, Organimi, Pingboard
ChartHopHeld
Four alternativesFunctionly, Miro, Pingboard, Workday
ChartHop, Orgvue
Nine alternativesCanva, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw, draw.io
draw.io
Eight alternativesLucidchart, Miro, Monday.com, Org Chart Studio, Organimi, Syncfusion, Waybook Org Chart Maker, Xmind Org Chart Maker
against: ChartHop, Microsoft Visio, SmartDraw
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5ChartHop
Four alternativesOneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard, Sift
ChartHopHeld
One alternativeFunctionly
no first choiceCreately, Organimi
Eight alternativesCanva, ChartHop, Cloudairy, Deel, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Wondershare EdrawMax, draw.io
no first choiceagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, SmartDraw
GPT-6 LunaOrganimi
Two alternativesChartHop, OrgChart
against: Lucidchart
ChartHopChangedno first choice
Seven alternativesChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard
Organimi
One alternativediagrams.net
no first choiceagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Muse Glimmer 30BPingboard
Four alternativesChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChartHub, Organimi
against: Microsoft Visio
ChartHopChanged
Two alternativesFunctionly, Orgvue
Lucidchart, OrgChart
Four alternativesChartHop, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Diagrams.net — formerly draw.io, Organimi
Two alternativesCreately, Lucidchart
no first choiceagainst: SmartDraw
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:24yes99 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:18yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:09yes1126 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:10yes183 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:26yes2210 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:39yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:05yes2144 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:23yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:31no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:48yes1639 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:04yes1625 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:34yes1823 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:01yes420 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:33yes1423 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:37no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:37yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:04yes823 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:23yes163 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:36yes115 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:22no03 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:13yes2323 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:47yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:46yes518 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:51yes814 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:21yes810 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:39yes1018 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:23yes211 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:07yes2330 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:36yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:19yes1213 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:16yes2328 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:04yes185 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:55yes1811 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:25yes910 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:14yes2357 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:54yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:00yes1529 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:14yes1829 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:07yes23110 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:12yes1319 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:12yes722 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:50yes1532 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:37yes1018 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:37no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:05yes1924 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:28yes194 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:57yes1813 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:43yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:13yes2327 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:19yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:56yes520 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:57yes1428 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:07yes1677 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:19yes853 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:01yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:34yes1315 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:50no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:40no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:12yes1424 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:22yes216 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:28yes1210 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:38no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:55yes1431 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:41yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:42yes528 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:51no022 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:09no010 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:11no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:37yes216 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:42no06 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:07yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:30yes45 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:12yes1727 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:04yes174 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:43yes198 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:14yes53 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:56yes2137 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:02yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:30yes533 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:15yes2125 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:01yes1227 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:18yes2136 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:51yes125 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:54yes2333 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel HR read as Deel
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Lucidchart/Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Nakisa read as Nakisa Org Design Suite
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
Unresolved, counted raw
Chartspan
Creately Atlas
Diagrams.net — formerly draw.io
Gliffy
Google Sheets add-ons
Lumify Group
Luminal
Microsoft Visio Plan 1
MyDraw
One Directory
Org Charts for M365
OrgCharting
Orgimi
People.ai
Plenryo
SharePoint native
Structure Inc.
Syncfusion
Waybook Org Chart Maker
Wondershare (MindMaster)
Wondershare EdrawMax
Xmind Org Chart Maker
eXtreme TeamPlot
orginio
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Employee monitoringPeople analytics →