Org charts and org design for enterprise buyers
Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · ChartHop 20%
24Orgvue20ChartHop12Ingentis org.manager44others
24% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Orgvue held the lead, +2 points on 22%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Organimi32%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
ChartHop30%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Orgvue24%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Organimi32%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop30%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseOrgvue24%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Orgvue24%0%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 24%
Orgvue24%0%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 24%02ChartHop20%11%54accepted challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 9% → 20%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 20%
ChartHop20%11%54accepted challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 9% → 20%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 20%03
Ingentis org.manager12%0%39accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 12%
Ingentis org.manager12%0%39accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 12%04
OneDirectory10%3%30accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 10%
OneDirectory10%3%30accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 10%05
OrgChart7%10%42accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 11% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 6%
OrgChart7%10%42accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 11% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 6%06
Lucidchart5%59%51criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 6%
Lucidchart5%59%51criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 6%07
Nakisa Org Design Suite3%0%20accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%
Nakisa Org Design Suite3%0%20accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%08
Microsoft Visio3%63%43criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Microsoft Visio3%63%43criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%09Organimi2%35%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Organimi2%35%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%10
Creately2%71%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Creately2%71%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
SmartDraw0%81%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SmartDraw0%81%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
Miro0%72%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Miro0%72%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Pingboard0%26%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Pingboard0%26%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
SAP SuccessFactors0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Workday0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Workday0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs OrgChartChartHop vs OneDirectoryChartHop vs FunctionlyChartHop vs LucidchartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs CreatelyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs OneDirectoryOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs LucidchartPingboard vs CreatelyPingboard vs OrgChartPingboard vs OneDirectoryPingboard vs FunctionlyPingboard vs LucidchartCreately vs OrgChartCreately vs OneDirectoryCreately vs FunctionlyCreately vs LucidchartOrgChart vs OneDirectoryOrgChart vs FunctionlyOrgChart vs LucidchartOneDirectory vs FunctionlyOneDirectory vs LucidchartFunctionly vs Lucidchart
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Orgvue24%
Orgvue24%02ChartHop20%
ChartHop20%03Ingentis org.manager12%
Ingentis org.manager12%04OneDirectory10%
OneDirectory10%05OrgChart7%
OrgChart7%06Lucidchart5%
Lucidchart5%07Nakisa Org Design Suite3%
Nakisa Org Design Suite3%08Microsoft Visio3%
Microsoft Visio3%09Organimi2%
Organimi2%10Creately2%
Creately2%11Pingboard0%
Pingboard0%12Workday0%
Workday0%13SAP SuccessFactors0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%14Miro0%
Miro0%15SmartDraw0%
SmartDraw0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lucidchart59%
30 of 51 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 17 hard negative
“**Basic diagramming tools** such as Lucidchart or SmartDraw if you need automatic directory sync... **Avoid** simple diagramming tools for core workforce records.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Microsoft Visio63%
27 of 43 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“Static Diagramming Tools (e.g., Microsoft Visio, Lucidchart, Creately, EdrawMax) ... avoid or approach with extreme caution” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Miro72%
13 of 18 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“should avoid or exercise caution with general-purpose diagramming tools like Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, and Microsoft Visio” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Creately71%
10 of 14 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“avoid or exercise caution with general-purpose diagramming tools like Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, and Microsoft Visio” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1053 links across 184 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 32 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · OneDirectory49 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
41 answers · 55 citations · 13 models
vendor site · TeamOhana29 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Venngage26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow23 answers · 23 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Creately21 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Nakisa19 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Org Chart Studio19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zapier19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orgvue orgvue.com | 24% | 90 | 880 | 10 | 20,029 | $9,026 | 22 | |
| ChartHop charthop.com | 20% | 365 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Ingentis ingentis.com Ingentis org.manager 12% | 12% | 52 | 30 | 0 | 11,481 company | 5 | ||
| OneDirectory onedirectory.com | 10% | 43 | 170 | 0 | 3,468 | 1 | ||
| OrgChart orgchartstudio.com | 7% | 78 | 33,100 | 5 | 428 | |||
| Nakisa HR Suite nakisa.com Nakisa Org Design Suite 3%, Nakisa Workforce Planning 2%, Nakisa OrgInsight 2%, Nakisa HR Suite 0% | 7% | 25 | 5,231 | 7 | ||||
| Lucidchart lucid.co | 5% | 159 | 74,000 | 878 | 684,398 | $313 | 120 | 9 |
| OrgWeaver | 3% | |||||||
| Microsoft Visio microsoft.com | 3% | 98 | 22,200 | 1,019 | 145,358,109 | $12,455 | 103 | 3 |
| Organimi organimi.com | 2% | 110 | 1,300 | 7 | 58,699 | 7 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (creately.com, theorgchart.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade org chart tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Ingentis org.managerOrgvueChangedChartHop, Ingentis org.manageragainst: Microsoft VisioChartHopagainst: Lucidchartno first choiceagainst: Canva, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio
Two alternatives
GoProfiles, Microsoft VisioThree alternatives
Functionly, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChartFour alternatives
GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, PingboardThree alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, OneDirectory, OrgChartGPT-5.4 miniOrgvueOrgvueHeldOrgvueagainst: MiroLucidchartno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OrgChartOne alternative
WorkdaySix alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Personio, SiftOne alternative
OrgChartGemini 3.5 FlashChartHopagainst: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioOrgvueChangedagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioNakisa Workforce Planning, Orgvueagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroTeamOrgChartagainst: ChartHop, Factorial, SiftChartHopagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Orgimi / Organimiagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Oracle HCM Cloud, Organimi, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, draw.io
Seven alternatives
Altify, Arpedio, Beyond Intranet, Introhive, Lucidchart, Nakisa Hanelly, OneDirectoryFour alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa HR Suite, TeamOhanaFive alternatives
Beyond Intranet, ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OneDirectory, SiftFour alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Miro, OrganimiThree alternatives
Agentnoon, Nakisa Hanelly, PingboardPerplexity SonarIngentis org.managerOrgvueChangedOrgChartagainst: LucidchartOneDirectoryagainst: ChartHopno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Organimi, SmartDraw
Two alternatives
OneDirectory, OrgvueThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, SmartDrawFour alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Nakisa Org Design SuiteOne alternative
OrgChartGrok 4.1 FastOrgChartagainst: MiroOrgvueChangedIngentis org.manageragainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDrawMicrosoft Visioagainst: ChartHop, HR PlatformsOrgChartagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw
Two alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft VisioThree alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design Suite, Workday or SAP SuccessFactors modulesSix alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, OrgChart, Orgvue, PingboardFour alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory, OrgChartFour alternatives
ChartHop, HR Directory 365, Nakisa Org Design Suite, PingboardMistral SmallIngentis org.manager, OrgvueChartHop, OrgvueChangedChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Chartagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDrawOneDirectoryChartHopagainst: Microsoft Viva Insights, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Mural, SmartDraw, draw.io
One alternative
DemandFarmFour alternatives
Microsoft Visio, OrgPlus, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Workforce PlanningTwo alternatives
Oak Engage, PingboardOne alternative
OrgChartDeepSeek V4 FlashIngentis org.manager, OrgChartagainst: LucidchartOrgvueChangedChartHop, OrgChart, Pingboardagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDrawCreatelyagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChartno first choiceagainst: Creately, Excel, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, SmartDraw, UKG Pro, Workday
Two alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Workforce PlanningThree alternatives
ChartHop, Functionly, WorkdayOne alternative
OrganimiTwo alternatives
OneDirectory, PingboardSix alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, OrgChart, OrgvueLlama 4 MaverickIngentis org.manager, OrgvueOrgvueChangedIngentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, PingboardOneDirectoryno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BCG's OrgVantage, Deel, Functionly, LucidchartTwo alternatives
Softr, VenngageQwen 3.7 FlashIngentis org.manageragainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioChartHopChangedOneDirectoryagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioLucidchart, Microsoft Visioagainst: ChartHop, OrgChartno first choiceagainst: Canva, Creately, EdrawMax, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Nestr, Organimi, Piktochart, Venngage
Two alternatives
OneDirectory, OrgvueFive alternatives
Lucidchart, Miro, Omni-Organizer, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayThree alternatives
ChartHop, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Org ModelTwo alternatives
Creately, PingboardKimi K2ChartHop, Nakisa Workforce PlanningNakisa Org Design SuiteChangedIngentis org.manageragainst: Microsoft VisioOneDirectoryagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SiftChartHopagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboardagainst: Canva, Creately, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw
One alternative
OrgChartThree alternatives
ChartHop, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayFour alternatives
ChartHop, OneDirectory, Orgvue, PingboardThree alternatives
OrgChart, Organimi, PingboardTwo alternatives
Nakisa OrgInsight, OrgChartGLM 4.7 FlashXOneDirectoryOrgWeaverChangedChartHop, OrgChartagainst: Native ModulesChartHopagainst: OneDirectoryOrgvueagainst: ChatGPT, Claude, Creately, Excel, Google Sheets, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Five alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChart, OrgvueThree alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgvueOne alternative
OrgChartFour alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, OrgChartMiniMax M2.5LucidchartNakisa OrgDesign, OrgWeaverChangedagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDraw, draw.ioOrgChartOrganimiagainst: OrgChartNakisa Org Design Suiteagainst: Creately, Excel/Google Sheets, Keynote, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Miro, SmartDraw
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, Ingentis org.managerOne alternative
CreatelyFive alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, SharePoint Smart Org ChartThree alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgvueThree alternatives
ChartHop, OrgChart, OrgWeaverGPT-6 LunaChartHopOrgvueChangedno first choiceOrgChartBuilderChartHopagainst: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi
Three alternatives
DemandFarm, Ingentis org.manager, LucidchartOne alternative
Workday Org StudioSeven alternatives
ChartHop, OrgChart, Organimi, Orgvue, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Organization ManagementOne alternative
OrgChartThree alternatives
Lucidchart, Organimi, Your existing HRISMuse Glimmer 30BIngentis org.manageragainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Miro, SmartDrawOrgvueChangedChartHopagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioOneDirectoryagainst: ChartHop, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, PingboardNakisa OrgInsight, OrgChartagainst: Lucidchart, SmartDrawagainst: Canva, EdrawMind, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, Venngage
Two alternatives
ChartHop, OrgvueFour alternatives
ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChart, OrganimiThree alternatives
Functionly, OrgChart, OrgPlusThree alternatives
FirstHR, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 13 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 13 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 23 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:43 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:21 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 19 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 17 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 22 | 49 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 8 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 21 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 13 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:35 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 17 | 160 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 14 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 17 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:04 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:52 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:43 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 22 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 8 | 88 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 3 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel HR read as Deel
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Lucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Nakisa read as Nakisa Org Design Suite
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
Unresolved, counted raw
Altify (by Upland)
Anywhere
Arpedio
BCG's OrgVantage
EdrawMax
EdrawMind
Employee Directory 365
HR Platforms (e.g., Workday, UKG)
Introhive
Microsoft Excel
Nakisa Org Chart
Nakisa OrgDesign
Native Modules (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG)
Omni-Organizer
Orgimi / Organimi
Piktochart
Plumsail Org Chart 365
SharePoint Smart Org Chart
Time Is Ltd. (Org Chart Pro/Business)
Workday Org Model
Workday Org Studio
Workday Organization Management
Workday or SAP SuccessFactors modules
Your existing HRIS
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.