Org charts and org design for small business buyers
Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Lucidchart 19%
32Organimi19Lucidchart13draw.io36others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Organimi held the lead, −5 points on 31%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Organimi32%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
ChartHop30%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Orgvue24%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Organimi32%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketChartHop30%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseOrgvue24%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Organimi32%2%52endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 27%
Organimi32%2%52endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 27%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 27%02
Lucidchart19%20%66accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 22% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 22%
Lucidchart19%20%66accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 22% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 22%03
draw.io13%14%28accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 13%
draw.io13%14%28accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 13%04
Pingboard11%18%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 13%
Pingboard11%18%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 13%05
BambooHR4%5%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
BambooHR4%5%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%06ChartHop4%25%32criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
ChartHop4%25%32criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07
Creately2%18%28accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%
Creately2%18%28accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%08
Miro2%24%33accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Miro2%24%33accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%09
Canva2%23%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Canva2%23%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Microsoft PowerPoint0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Microsoft PowerPoint0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%15
Microsoft Visio0%48%27criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Microsoft Visio0%48%27criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%13
SmartDraw0%31%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SmartDraw0%31%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
OrgChart0%13%15accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
OrgChart0%13%15accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%10
The Org0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
The Org0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Deel0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Deel0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs OrgChartChartHop vs OneDirectoryChartHop vs FunctionlyChartHop vs LucidchartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs CreatelyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs OneDirectoryOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs LucidchartPingboard vs CreatelyPingboard vs OrgChartPingboard vs OneDirectoryPingboard vs FunctionlyPingboard vs LucidchartCreately vs OrgChartCreately vs OneDirectoryCreately vs FunctionlyCreately vs LucidchartOrgChart vs OneDirectoryOrgChart vs FunctionlyOrgChart vs LucidchartOneDirectory vs FunctionlyOneDirectory vs LucidchartFunctionly vs Lucidchart
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Organimi32%
Organimi32%02Lucidchart19%
Lucidchart19%03draw.io13%
draw.io13%04Pingboard11%
Pingboard11%05BambooHR4%
BambooHR4%06ChartHop4%
ChartHop4%07Creately2%
Creately2%08Miro2%
Miro2%09Canva2%
Canva2%10The Org0%
The Org0%11Deel0%
Deel0%12OrgChart0%
OrgChart0%13SmartDraw0%
SmartDraw0%14Microsoft PowerPoint0%
Microsoft PowerPoint0%15Microsoft Visio0%
Microsoft Visio0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Visio48%
13 of 27 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Tools designed primarily for making static illustrations (like **Microsoft Visio**, **PowerPoint**, or **Canva**)... **Why to Avoid:** These tools create "dead" data.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Lucidchart20%
13 of 66 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid** relying on static diagramming tools (Visio, Lucidchart, SmartDraw, Creately, Miro, Canva, draw.io, PowerPoint) as the *official* org chart.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Miro24%
8 of 33 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“**Avoid** relying on static diagramming tools (Visio, Lucidchart, SmartDraw, Creately, Miro, Canva, draw.io, PowerPoint)” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
ChartHop25%
8 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“org chart tools small businesses should avoid or be cautious about ... ChartHop ⚠️ ... the minimum contract makes it cost-prohibitive for small teams” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 935 links across 154 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 32 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · FirstHR44 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
38 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Venngage29 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G227 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Connecteam25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · TeamOhana23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Softr20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Creately20 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · The Org20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 10 models
38 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 12 models
25 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organimi organimi.com | 32% | 110 | 1,300 | 7 | 58,699 | 7 | 1 | |
| Lucidchart lucid.co | 19% | 159 | 74,000 | 878 | 684,398 | $313 | 120 | 9 |
| draw.io drawio.com draw.io 13%, diagrams.net 4% | 17% | 38 | 90,500 | 1,096 | 141,930 | |||
| Pingboard pingboard.com | 11% | 90 | 2,400 | 2 | 265 | |||
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 4% | 1082 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 | |
| ChartHop charthop.com | 4% | 365 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Functionly functionly.com | 4% | 24 | 1,300 | 0 | 45,770 | 0 | ||
| Creately creately.com | 2% | 82 | 2,400 | 797,895 | 383,446 | 3 | 7 | |
| Miro miro.com | 2% | 72 | 135,000 | 3,760 | 1,089,824 | 120 | ||
| Canva canva.com | 2% | 52 | 24,900,000 | 183,421 | 81,177,765 | 101 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (creately.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, theorg.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top org chart tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BambooHRno first choiceChangedOrganimiOrganimi, draw.iono first choiceagainst: Canva, ChartHop, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Pingboard, Visme
Three alternatives
Lucidchart, Organimi, diagrams.netFive alternatives
BambooHR, Canva, ChartHop, Lucidchart, PingboardTwo alternatives
Canva, CreatelyGPT-5.4 miniBambooHRLucidchartChangedLucidchartdraw.iono first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Built, OrgChart, OrganimiOne alternative
MiroEight alternatives
Canva, ChartHop, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Ninety, Organimi, diagrams.net, draw.ioThree alternatives
Org Chart Studio, Organimi, orgchart.liveGemini 3.5 FlashPingboardPingboardHeldOrganimiagainst: Orgvue, Workdaydraw.ioGoProfiles, Pingboardagainst: ChartHop, Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Mural, Nakisa Org Design Suite, Oracle PeopleSoft, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors, TeamOhana, Workday
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Softr, The OrgFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, The Operating System CanvasSeven alternatives
BambooHR, Deel, Lucidchart, Miro, Pingboard, Rippling, SoftrFour alternatives
Canva, Google Sheets, Miro, OrganimiFive alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Deel, Gusto, RipplingPerplexity SonarOrganimiFunctionlyChangedOrganimiagainst: LarkCreatelyagainst: Lucidchartno first choiceagainst: Canva, Excel, Google Sheets, Google Slides, Keynote, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, draw.io
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioTwo alternatives
Creately, OrganimiSix alternatives
BambooHR, Canva, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroTwo alternatives
Canva, ConnecteamGrok 4.1 FastOrganimiagainst: Canva, draw.ioLucidchartChangedagainst: Microsoft VisioLucidchart, Organimiagainst: Pingboarddiagrams.netPingboardagainst: OrgChartagainst: Creately, Functionly, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Oracle HCM Cloud, OrgChart, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Sift, SmartDraw, Workday
Two alternatives
Lucidchart, PingboardTwo alternatives
Creately, MiroOne alternative
CreatelyFive alternatives
Canva, Connecteam, Lucidchart, Microsoft SmartArt, OrganimiTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, OrganimiMistral SmallLucidchart, OrganimiLucidchartChangedLucidchart, The Orgdraw.iono first choiceagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio
Two alternatives
SmartDraw, VenngageThree alternatives
Canva, Miro, draw.ioFour alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, OrgWeaver, OrganimiTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, SmartDrawDeepSeek V4 FlashOrganimi, PingboardOrganimiChangedagainst: Lucidchart, Miro, Pingboard, The OrgLucidchart, Organimiagainst: ChartHopOrganimiagainst: Lucidchartno first choiceagainst: ChartHop, ClickUp, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, The OrgFour alternatives
Canva, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, draw.ioTwo alternatives
Creately, draw.ioTwo alternatives
OrgChart, OrganimiLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceLucidchartChangedno first choiceOrganimino first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Miro, Organimi, SoftrTwo alternatives
BambooHR, SmartDrawQwen 3.7 FlashLucidchartagainst: LinkedIn Sales Navigator, ZoomInfoMiroChangedno first choiceagainst: draw.ioCanvano first choiceagainst: Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Sketchagainst: Canva, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, draw.ioFour alternatives
Asana, Gusto, Lucidchart, Monday.comFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, OrganimiFive alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, Miro, OrgChartThree alternatives
BambooHR, Humi, OrgChartKimi K2OrganimiFunctionlyChangedOrganimi, The Orgagainst: PingboardOrganimiOrganimiagainst: BambooHR, ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio
Four alternatives
Functionly, Lucidchart, Pingboard, draw.ioTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, OrganimiTwo alternatives
Creately, LucidchartThree alternatives
Creately, Lucidchart, draw.ioFour alternatives
Lucidchart, Pingboard, Sift, The OrgGLM 4.7 FlashXChartHopLucidchartChangedno first choiceagainst: ChartHopdraw.ioChartHop, Lucidchartagainst: Creately, Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw
Two alternatives
Lucidchart, PingboardThree alternatives
Canva, Miro, draw.ioFive alternatives
Lucidchart, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw, SoftrFour alternatives
Canva, Lucidchart, Miro, OrganimiFour alternatives
Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Organimi, PingboardMiniMax M2.5Lucidchart, PingboardLucidchartChangedLucidchart, OrganimiOrganimi, draw.iono first choiceagainst: Canva, ChartHop, Creately, Excel, Google Slides, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors, SmartDraw, Workday, draw.io
Two alternatives
ChartHop, OrganimiOne alternative
PingboardFour alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, Pingboard, draw.ioOne alternative
CreatelyGPT-6 LunaOrganimiGalbraith Star ModelChangedOrganimiOrganimino first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Organimi, Visio Plan 2
Two alternatives
Lucidchart, Visio in Microsoft 365Three alternatives
Canva, Lucidchart, MiroOne alternative
diagrams.netMuse Glimmer 30BOrganimiOrganimiHeldOrganimiOrganimi, diagrams.net, draw.iono first choiceagainst: ChartHop, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, PingboardOne alternative
LucidchartTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, MiroTwo alternatives
Creately, LucidchartBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 24 | 188 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:08 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 14 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 11 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:03 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:12 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 23 | 64 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 1 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 7 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 13 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 17 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 19 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:29 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 23 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:00 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:59 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:14 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:31 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 20 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 17 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel HR read as Deel
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Nakisa read as Nakisa Org Design Suite
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
PowerPoint (as dedicated org chart software) read as Microsoft PowerPoint
Unresolved, counted raw
AccountMap.ai
Galbraith Star Model
Humi
Microsoft SmartArt
Ninety
Sketch
The Operating System Canvas
Visio Plan 2
Visio in Microsoft 365
orgchart.live
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.