Workforce planning for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workforce planning software”, and as “headcount planning tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Anaplan29Workday Adaptive Planning07ChartHop21others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Anaplan held the lead, −6 points on 47%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ChartHop31%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: ChartHop (33%) replaces Homebase (22% then, 17% now), 17 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop37%Contested▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Anaplan43%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
ChartHop31%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: ChartHop (33%) replaces Homebase (22% then, 17% now), 17 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop37%Contested▲+8Since September 2026: 31% → 39%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseAnaplan43%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Anaplan43%10%68endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 40%
Anaplan43%10%68endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 47% → 40%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 40%02
Workday Adaptive Planning29%5%60accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 29% → 32%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 32%
Workday Adaptive Planning29%5%60accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 29% → 32%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 32%03ChartHop7%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 9%
ChartHop7%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 9%04
Pigment5%0%18accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
Pigment5%0%18accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%05
Workday4%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
Workday4%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Rippling0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Rippling0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%24%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%24%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Visier0%21%29accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Visier0%21%29accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%07
Orgvue0%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Orgvue0%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
UKG Pro0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
UKG Pro0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs TeamOhanaChartHop vs PlanfulChartHop vs HiBobChartHop vs RipplingHomebase vs AbacumHomebase vs Workday Adaptive PlanningHomebase vs TeamOhanaHomebase vs PlanfulHomebase vs HiBobHomebase vs RipplingAbacum vs Workday Adaptive PlanningAbacum vs TeamOhanaAbacum vs PlanfulAbacum vs HiBobAbacum vs RipplingWorkday Adaptive Planning vs TeamOhanaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PlanfulWorkday Adaptive Planning vs HiBobWorkday Adaptive Planning vs RipplingTeamOhana vs PlanfulTeamOhana vs HiBobTeamOhana vs RipplingPlanful vs HiBobPlanful vs RipplingHiBob vs Rippling
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Anaplan43%
Anaplan43%02Workday Adaptive Planning29%
Workday Adaptive Planning29%03ChartHop7%
ChartHop7%04Pigment5%
Pigment5%05Workday4%
Workday4%06SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%07Orgvue0%
Orgvue0%08Visier0%
Visier0%09UKG Pro0%
UKG Pro0%10Rippling0%
Rippling0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning24%
8 of 34 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“suitable for large companies seeking a centralized HR platform, but the results here do not show clearer cost predictability than Workday” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Visier21%
6 of 29 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“more analytics-focused than transformation-focused... Pricing is on the higher end with one- to three-year commitments” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
BambooHR83%
5 of 6 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“isn't built for advanced workforce analytics. There's no predictive modeling” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Rippling38%
5 of 13 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“no dedicated workforce planning or scenario modeling tools” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1099 links across 267 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Guideflow51 answers · 63 citations · 11 models
40 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Intervue28 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rework25 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Happeo21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SkillPanel17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 7 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce planning software”, “workforce planning software”, “workforce planning tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 43% | 150 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 | ||
| Workday parent site Workday Adaptive Planning 29%, Workday HCM 4%, Workday Workforce Planning 2% | 34% | 216 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| ChartHop charthop.com | 7% | 365 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Pigment pigment.com | 5% | 36 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | ||
| Workday workday.com | 4% | 383 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 | 80 | 1 | |
| TeamOhana teamohana.com | 4% | 40 | 320 | 4 | 470 | 4 | ||
| Planful planful.com | 2% | 23 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle Workforce Planning 2%, Oracle Workforce Modeling 0%, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM 0%, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 0% | 2% | 283 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| SAP parent site SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning 0% | 0% | 54 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Orgvue orgvue.com | 0% | 90 | 880 | 10 | 20,029 | $9,026 | 22 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkthat.ai, g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best workforce planning software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce planning software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which headcount planning tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workforce planning tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce planning software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workforce planning software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce planning tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AnaplanWorkdayChangedAnaplanagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningChartHopno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, BambooHR, Oracle Workforce Planning, Orgvue, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier, Workday HCM
Two alternatives
Board, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Orgvue, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningGPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce PlanningAnaplanChangedUKG ProWorkday Adaptive Planningno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Anaplan, Nakisa Workforce PlanningTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, Dayforce, Oracle, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, WorkdayOne alternative
Oracle Fusion EPM Workforce PlanningGemini 3.5 FlashAnaplan, PigmentPigmentChangedagainst: AnaplanAnaplanagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningTeamOhanaWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplanagainst: BambooHR, Excel, Google Sheets, Gusto, Rippling
Five alternatives
ChartHop, Orgvue, TeamOhana, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Orgvue, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning, headcount365Four alternatives
Orgvue, Pigment, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Agentnoon, Anaplan, ChartHop, Workday Adaptive Planning, headcount365Two alternatives
Pigment, VisierPerplexity SonarAnaplanWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedAnaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planningno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday
Three alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Anaplan, PigmentFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Aeqium, Rippling, UKG Pro, VisierOne alternative
AnaplanGrok 4.1 FastAnaplanAnaplanHeldno first choiceagainst: HiBob, RipplingAnaplanagainst: ChartHop, Deputy, UKG Readyno first choiceagainst: Abacum, Anaplan, BambooHR, Orgvue, Spreadsheets, Visier
Five alternatives
Dayforce, Oracle Workforce Modeling, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, WorkdayTwo alternatives
ChartHop, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningMistral SmallAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningHeldWorkday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planningno first choiceagainst: Abacum, Anaplan, Spreadsheets, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, VisierTwo alternatives
ChartHop, OrgvueThree alternatives
Anaplan, UKG Pro Workforce Management, VisierDeepSeek V4 FlashAnaplanAnaplanHeldAnaplanWorkday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: ChartHop, Visieragainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, ChartHop, Deel Workforce Planning, Excel, Google Sheets, HiBob, IBM Cognos, Looker, Mendix, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle, Oracle Hyperion, OutSystems, SAP BPC, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Tableau, TeamOhana, Workday
Four alternatives
Oracle Workforce Modeling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning, headcount365Five alternatives
Oracle Cloud HCM Workforce Modeling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, VisierTwo alternatives
Planful, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceAnaplanChangedno first choiceAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Abacum, Rippling
Three alternatives
Abacum, Deel HR, WorkdayQwen 3.7 FlashAnaplanChartHop, Workday HCMChangedAnaplanPlanfulagainst: Salesforceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Provia, Replicon, UKG Pro, WorkdayOne alternative
AnaplanFive alternatives
Board International, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningKimi K2Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplanChangedAnaplanChartHopno first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Two alternatives
Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, Orgvue, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, ChartHop, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningGLM 4.7 FlashXAnaplanagainst: UKG ProWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedWorkdayWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planningno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Oracle Workforce Modeling, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, VisierFour alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Teams, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG ProOne alternative
AnaplanMiniMax M2.5Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningHeldAnaplanChartHopagainst: Anaplan, Visier, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkdayagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Three alternatives
Pigment, Planful, VisierThree alternatives
ChartHop, TeamOhana, WorkdayFour alternatives
Oracle Hyperion, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Dayforce, RipplingFour alternatives
Anaplan, ChartHop, Deel Workforce Planning, VisierGPT-6 LunaAnaplanAnaplanHeldAnaplanTeamOhanaagainst: UKG Pro Workforce Managementno first choiceagainst: Oracle’s discontinued Strategic Workforce Planning Cloud Service, Planning Workforce module, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning
One alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningEleven alternatives
Dayforce Workforce Management, Legion, Nakisa Workforce Planning, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Workforce Management, Orgvue, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC) for planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce ManagementTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningMuse Glimmer 30BAnaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday HCMAnaplanChangedAnaplanAnaplan, Oracle Workforce Planningno first choiceagainst: Abacum, BambooHR, ChartHop, Deel Workforce Planning, HiBob, Paylocity, Rippling, TeamOhana, Visier
Four alternatives
Oracle, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG ProTwo alternatives
Oracle Workforce Modeling, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Planning / Oracle Workforce Modeling, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 18 | 115 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 16 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 19 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 7 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 22 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 15 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 22 | 54 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 22 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 12 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 18 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 20 | 73 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 22 | 94 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 17 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:53 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:50 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 22 | 82 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:29 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 22 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 22 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 8 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 18 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 12 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
Deel read as Deel Workforce Planning
Oracle Cloud EPM Workforce read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud HCM (Workforce Modeling) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Power BI read as Microsoft Power BI
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
EPM Enterprise Cloud
Eightfold Workforce Planning
IBM Cognos
Mendix
Oracle Cloud HCM Workforce Modeling
Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Planning / Oracle Workforce Modeling
Oracle Fusion EPM Workforce Planning
Oracle’s discontinued Strategic Workforce Planning Cloud Service (SWPCS)
OutSystems
Planning Workforce module
Provia
SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC) for planning
SAP BPC
monday.com's Agentnoon
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.