Pay equity for small business buyers
Asked as “pay equity analysis software”, and as “pay transparency compliance tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
31%
Contested · HRSoft 6%
31Gusto06HRSoft06LEEP Toolkit58others
31% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Gusto held the lead, +10 points on 21%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Gusto31%Contested▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Syndio12%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseSyndio62%Clear leader▲+8Since September 2026: 53% → 62%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Gusto31%Contested▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketSyndio12%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseSyndio62%Clear leader▲+8Since September 2026: 53% → 62%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Gusto31%0%33endorsed leader▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 30%
Gusto31%0%33endorsed leader▲+10Since September 2026: 21% → 30%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 30%02
Pave6%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 7%
Pave6%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 7%03
HRSoft6%11%18accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
HRSoft6%11%18accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%04
OpenComp6%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 7%
OpenComp6%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 7%05
Payscale4%12%25accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%
Payscale4%12%25accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%06
PayAnalytics4%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
PayAnalytics4%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%07
Salary.com Pay Equity4%15%13accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Salary.com Pay Equity4%15%13accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%08
Ravio2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Ravio2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%09
BambooHR2%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
BambooHR2%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%10
HiBob2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
HiBob2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
beqom Pay Equity0%85%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
beqom Pay Equity0%85%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13Syndio0%80%41criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Syndio0%80%41criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
Trusaic PayParity0%77%30criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Trusaic PayParity0%77%30criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Syndio vs Workleap CompensationSyndio vs PaveSyndio vs Trusaic PayParitySyndio vs AeqiumPayAnalytics vs PayscalePayAnalytics vs FiguresPayAnalytics vs Workleap CompensationPayAnalytics vs PavePayAnalytics vs Trusaic PayParityPayAnalytics vs AeqiumPayscale vs FiguresPayscale vs Workleap CompensationPayscale vs PavePayscale vs Trusaic PayParityPayscale vs AeqiumFigures vs Workleap CompensationFigures vs PaveFigures vs Trusaic PayParityFigures vs AeqiumWorkleap Compensation vs PaveWorkleap Compensation vs Trusaic PayParityWorkleap Compensation vs AeqiumPave vs Trusaic PayParityPave vs AeqiumTrusaic PayParity vs Aeqium
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Gusto31%
Gusto31%02Pave6%
Pave6%03HRSoft6%
HRSoft6%04OpenComp6%
OpenComp6%05Payscale4%
Payscale4%06PayAnalytics4%
PayAnalytics4%07Salary.com Pay Equity4%
Salary.com Pay Equity4%08Ravio2%
Ravio2%09BambooHR2%
BambooHR2%10HiBob2%
HiBob2%11beqom Pay Equity0%
beqom Pay Equity0%12Trusaic PayParity0%
Trusaic PayParity0%13Syndio0%
Syndio0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Syndio80%
33 of 41 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Small businesses should **avoid enterprise‑grade, complex tools (like Syndio) that demand dedicated rewards staff and quote‑based pricing**” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
beqom Pay Equity85%
17 of 20 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“**Why avoid:** This is an **enterprise total-compensation management suite** that can cost **$100,000–$500,000+ per year**” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Trusaic PayParity77%
23 of 30 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - ... **Trusaic PayParity** — these are enterprise/statistical audit platforms priced for large organizations” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Lattice Compensate50%
3 of 6 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused platforms like Ravio ... or Lattice (minimum $4,000 annually)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1063 links across 177 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 46 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
53 answers · 85 citations · 13 models
44 answers · 54 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Effy41 answers · 42 citations · 13 models
30 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Skima29 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Soteria HR23 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · HiBob20 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Gusto17 answers · 32 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
51 answers · 13 models
44 answers · 12 models
41 answers · 13 models
29 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best pay equity analysis software”, “pay equity analysis software”, “pay equity tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gusto gusto.com | 31% | 870 | 673,000 | 10,560 | 1,629,483 | 118 | ||
| Pave pave.com | 6% | 213 | 27,100 | 28,423 | 7,645 | $91 | 7 | |
| HRSoft hrsoft.com | 6% | 24 | 720 | 5 | 1,230 | 15 | ||
| OpenComp opencomp.com | 6% | 49 | 390 | 0 | 5,524 | 51 | ||
| LEEP Toolkit | 6% | |||||||
| SixFifty sixfifty.com | 6% | 41 | 1,900 | 21 | 18,081 | $1,377 | 26 | |
| Payscale payscale.com | 4% | 229 | 9,900 | 299 | 1,408,989 | $26 | 33 | |
| PayAnalytics payanalytics.com | 4% | 63 | 20 | 0 | 1,025 | 8 | 6 | |
| Salary.com Pay Equity salary.com | 4% | 33 | 0 | 1,069,118 | $1,642 | 70 | 7 | |
| EquityPath equitypath.com | 4% | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best pay equity analysis software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best pay equity analysis software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which pay transparency compliance tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top pay equity tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best pay equity analysis software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a pay equity analysis software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which pay equity tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5OpenCompSixFiftyChangedEEOPayagainst: SyndioSalary.com Pay Equityno first choiceagainst: Compport, Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, HRSoft, Mercer, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, Workleap Compensation, beqom Pay Equity
Two alternatives
Compease, PayscaleTwo alternatives
Compease, PayAnalyticsFour alternatives
Compease, Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, Gusto, HRSoftTwo alternatives
CompUp, Parity SoftwareGPT-5.4 miniPayAnalyticsPihr Pay EquityChangedagainst: beqom Pay EquityHRSoft Pay Equity, OpenCompEquityPath, EquityTestagainst: HRSoft, Lattice Compensation, Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Compease, PayscaleTwo alternatives
Axios Analytics, Salary.com Pay EquityTwo alternatives
Payscale, SyndioGemini 3.5 FlashWorkleap Compensationagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityComprehensive.ioChangedagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, Workday Pay EquityPayAnalyticsagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityCompUpagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityFigures, OpenComp, Paveagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityagainst: Excel, Mercer, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
Three alternatives
Comprehensive.io, Payfederate, PayscaleThree alternatives
BambooHR, HiBob, RavioThree alternatives
Compease, Payfederate, Workleap CompensationFive alternatives
Gusto, OpenComp, Pave, PayAnalytics, Workleap CompensationFive alternatives
Excel, Google Sheet, Gusto, HiBob, RipplingPerplexity SonarBambooHR, HRSoftHiBobChangedagainst: beqom Pay EquityBambooHR, Gusto, PayscaleHRSoftagainst: Syndiono first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Two alternatives
HiBob, SyndioOne alternative
Trusaic PayParityTwo alternatives
Salary.com Pay Equity, Trusaic PayParityOne alternative
PaycomGrok 4.1 FastGustoagainst: SyndioSalary.com Pay EquityChangedGustoagainst: Payscale, SyndioGustoagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityno first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, Visieragainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Three alternatives
HRSoft, Payscale, Salary.com Pay EquityFour alternatives
ADP DataCloud, HiBob, Payscale, RavioTwo alternatives
Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, HRSoftThree alternatives
Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst, SpreadsheetsThree alternatives
Compease, Deel Compensation/Pay Equity, Effy AIMistral SmallHRSoftDeel Compensation/Pay Equity, GustoChangedagainst: SyndioOpenComp, PaveOpenComp, Payscaleno first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Two alternatives
BambooHR, CompaOne alternative
BambooHRTwo alternatives
Dandi, PayAnalyticsTwo alternatives
Compport, HRSoftDeepSeek V4 FlashGustoPayscaleChangedagainst: Syndio, beqom Pay EquityCompport, HRSoft PayEQagainst: SyndioGustoagainst: Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, SyndioPayAnalytics, Soteria HRagainst: Syndio, beqom Pay Equityagainst: Gusto's built-in visibility, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Four alternatives
Figures, Pave, PayAnalytics, Workleap CompensationTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Salary.com Pay EquityTwo alternatives
Gusto, Soteria HRThree alternatives
ADP DataCloud, Paychex, RipplingThree alternatives
HRSoft, OpenComp, PayscaleLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldGustono first choiceno first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
One alternative
HRSoftTwo alternatives
Compease, People AnalyticsQwen 3.7 FlashGustoGustoHeldWorkleap Compensationagainst: SyndioGustoagainst: Lattice Compensate, Raviono first choiceagainst: Salary.com CompAnalystagainst: Oracle, SAP SuccessFactors
One alternative
PayAnalyticsTwo alternatives
Pave, RipplingTwo alternatives
ChartHop, PaveTwo alternatives
HRSoft, OpenCompKimi K2Gustoagainst: Lattice Compensate, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquityPaveChangedGustoGusto, LEEP Toolkitagainst: Lattice CompensationPave, Ravioagainst: PayAnalytics, Syndio, Trusaic PayParityagainst: Gusto's pay equity features, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Four alternatives
CompUp, Pave, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalystThree alternatives
Compa, Figures, RavioTwo alternatives
PayAnalytics, Workleap CompensationThree alternatives
Pave, Ravio, Trusaic PayParityThree alternatives
BambooHR, Gusto, HiBobGLM 4.7 FlashXGustoGustoHeldagainst: HiBobGustoLEEP Toolkitagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParityno first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Three alternatives
HRSoft, Payscale, RavioOne alternative
SyndioTwo alternatives
Pave, RipplingTwo alternatives
CompUp, GustoMiniMax M2.5GustoSixFiftyChangedagainst: PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquityFiguresagainst: SyndioGusto, LEEP Toolkitno first choiceagainst: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
Three alternatives
ChartHop, OpenComp, Trusaic PayParityTwo alternatives
Gusto, PayscaleFour alternatives
CompUp, Gusto, HRSoft, PayAnalyticsTwo alternatives
CompUp, Free Excel/Google Sheets TemplatesGPT-6 LunaParity SoftwarePayTransparency.appChangedParity Software, PayEquity.aiagainst: Salary.com CompAnalyst Pay EquityEquityPathno first choicenothing named
One alternative
AffirmityThree alternatives
PayQare, Payscale, SyndioOne alternative
Equality CheckMuse Glimmer 30BGustoagainst: OpenComp, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay EquitySixFiftyChangedGusto, Levelly.ai, PaveGustoagainst: BambooHR, Lattice Compensateno first choiceagainst: Mercer, Soteria HR, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity
One alternative
HRSoftTwo alternatives
BambooHR, PayscaleFour alternatives
Aeqium, PayAnalytics, Ravio, Trusaic PayParityFive alternatives
Comprehensive.io, OpenComp, Pave, Payscale, RavioOne alternative
Soteria HRBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 23 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 16 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 10 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 8 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 20 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 14 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 19 | 109 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:53 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 15 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:40 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 11 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 13 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP DataCloud
Barley read as Workleap Compensation
Beqom read as beqom Pay Equity
CompAnalyst (by WorldatWork) read as Salary.com CompAnalyst
Comprehensive read as Comprehensive.io
Deel read as Deel Compensation/Pay Equity
Lattice read as Lattice Compensate
Payscale Ascent read as Payscale
Payscale Insight read as Payscale
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
Salary.com read as Salary.com Pay Equity
Syndio PayEQ read as Syndio
Trusaic read as Trusaic PayParity
Workday read as Workday Pay Equity
Workday HCM read as Workday Pay Equity
Workleap read as Workleap Compensation
beqom read as beqom Pay Equity
Unresolved, counted raw
CharHop
Equality Check
EquityTest
Free Excel/Google Sheets Templates
Gilt Edge / Paylab
Gusto's built-in visibility
Gusto's pay equity features
HRSoft Pay Equity
HRSoft PayEQ
HireEquity
Levelly.ai
PayQare
PayTransparency.app
Payscale Compaas
People Analytics
Pihr Pay Equity
Prosfy
Salary.com CompAnalyst Pay Equity
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.