Recruitment marketing and career sites for small business buyers
Asked as “recruitment marketing platform”, and as “career site builder”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
12%
Contested · Workable 12%
12Manatal12Workable12Zoho Recruit62others
12% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Workable (12%) replaces 100Hires (20% then, 4% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Workable leads at 12%, replacing 100Hires, which led at 20% and stands at 4% now: 8 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Workable12%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Workable (12%) replaces 100Hires (20% then, 4% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-market
Teamtailor23%Contested▲+8Since September 2026: 16% → 24%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Phenom35%Contested▼−7Since September 2026: 41% → 35%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Workable12%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Workable (12%) replaces 100Hires (20% then, 4% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketTeamtailor23%Contested▲+8Since September 2026: 16% → 24%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterprisePhenom35%Contested▼−7Since September 2026: 41% → 35%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Workable12%5%39accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 0% → 12%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 12%
Workable12%5%39accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 0% → 12%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 12%02
Zoho Recruit12%6%35accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 12%
Zoho Recruit12%6%35accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 12%03
Manatal12%0%27accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 14% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 12%
Manatal12%0%27accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 14% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 12%04
JazzHR11%0%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 7% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 10%
JazzHR11%0%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 7% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 10%05
Breezy HR11%0%25accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 10%
Breezy HR11%0%25accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 10%06Teamtailor7%6%17accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 8%
Teamtailor7%6%17accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 8%07
100Hires7%0%13accepted challenger▼−16Since September 2026: 20% → 4%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 4%
100Hires7%0%13accepted challenger▼−16Since September 2026: 20% → 4%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 4%08
TalentLyft4%0%16accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
TalentLyft4%0%16accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%09
Greenhouse4%31%13criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Greenhouse4%31%13criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%10
Recruitee2%14%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Recruitee2%14%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Phenom0%100%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Phenom0%100%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Beamery0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Beamery0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%59%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%59%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Indeed0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Indeed0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Teamtailor vs GemTeamtailor vs RecruiteeTeamtailor vs JobviteTeamtailor vs PhenomZoho Recruit vs WorkableZoho Recruit vs TalentLyftZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs RecruiteeZoho Recruit vs JobviteZoho Recruit vs PhenomWorkable vs TalentLyftWorkable vs GemWorkable vs RecruiteeWorkable vs JobviteWorkable vs PhenomTalentLyft vs GemTalentLyft vs RecruiteeTalentLyft vs JobviteTalentLyft vs PhenomGem vs RecruiteeGem vs JobviteGem vs PhenomRecruitee vs JobviteRecruitee vs PhenomJobvite vs Phenom
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Workable12%
Workable12%02Zoho Recruit12%
Zoho Recruit12%03Manatal12%
Manatal12%04JazzHR11%
JazzHR11%05Breezy HR11%
Breezy HR11%06Teamtailor7%
Teamtailor7%07100Hires7%
100Hires7%08TalentLyft4%
TalentLyft4%09Greenhouse4%
Greenhouse4%10Recruitee2%
Recruitee2%11Indeed0%
Indeed0%12LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%
LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%13Beamery0%
Beamery0%14Phenom0%
Phenom0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
LinkedIn Talent Solutions59%
10 of 17 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“reviews repeatedly flag it as **expensive**, with **high ad costs**, **complex setup**, and a poor fit for smaller companies' budgets” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
Avature100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“pricing is not transparent, there is no free trial, and its user interface is not intuitive. It is also not well-suited for very small organizations” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Beamery92%
12 of 13 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“"steer clear of enterprise-grade recruitment marketing platforms (RMPs) like Phenom, Beamery, or Joveo"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Symphony Talent100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“avoid custom-priced, full-suite platforms like Phenom, Beamery, SmashFly/Symphony Talent, Clinch, Avature and Eightfold” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1068 links across 223 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 25 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
52 answers · 67 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G250 answers · 130 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G239 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rework35 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sprad34 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Recruiterflow23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Built In15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pin14 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · JuggleHire13 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 12 models
40 answers · 12 models
37 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workable workable.com | 12% | 308 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 | |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 12% | 12% | 322 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Manatal manatal.com | 12% | 294 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | 7 | |
| JazzHR jazzhr.com | 11% | 210 | 14,800 | 70 | 11,754 | 19 | ||
| Breezy breezy.hr Breezy HR 11% | 11% | 189 | 3,600 | 59 | 178,670 company | $56 | 25 | |
| Teamtailor teamtailor.com | 7% | 74 | 2,400 | 59 | 42,407 | $230 | 114 | |
| 100Hires 100hires.com | 7% | 74 | 90 | 2 | 705 | 4 | ||
| TalentLyft talentlyft.com | 4% | 32 | 70 | 3 | 67,376 | |||
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 4% | 419 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 | |
| Pinpoint pinpointhq.com | 4% | 57 | 27,100 | 3,146 | 118,527 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (learn.g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best recruitment marketing platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which career site builder would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top recruitment marketing platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a recruitment marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which recruitment marketing platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAshby, Greenhouse, LeverChangedTeamtailorJazzHRno first choiceagainst: Freshsales, Indeed, Jobvite, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Textio, Unstop, ZipRecruiter, Zoho Recruit
Five alternatives
BambooHR Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Webflow, WordPress with job board plugins, WorkableFour alternatives
JazzHR, Manatal, Pinpoint, Recruit CRMFour alternatives
Manatal, Pin, TalentLyft, Zoho RecruitGPT-5.4 miniTeamtailorWorkableChangedTeamtailoragainst: BullhornZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Eploy, JobDiva, Joveo, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, SAP SuccessFactors, Talroo, iCIMS Attract
Two alternatives
Workable, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Jobvite, LeverThree alternatives
100Hires, JazzHR, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
AvaHR, Breezy HR, JazzHR, TeamtailorGemini 3.5 FlashGem, Teamtailoragainst: Beamery, PhenomHomerun, PinpointChangedGem, Teamtailoragainst: Beamery, Clinch, PhenomBreezy HRagainst: Clinch, Phenom, Symphony TalentPinpointagainst: Beamery, Phenom, Symphony Talentagainst: Appcast, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Indeed, Oracle Taleo, PandoLogic, Phenom, Symphony Talent, Workday Recruiting, ZipRecruiter, iCIMS Attract
Two alternatives
Recruitee, TalentLyftThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Dover, WorkableThree alternatives
JazzHR, Recruitee, WorkableThree alternatives
JazzHR, Recruitee, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Ashby, Breezy HR, Recruitee, WorkablePerplexity SonarZoho Recruitagainst: AshbyRecruiteeChangedJazzHR, ManatalZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Avature, LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Two alternatives
Manatal, TalentLyftThree alternatives
Breezy HR, TalentNest, WorkableFour alternatives
Loxo, The Applicant Manager, Workable, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
100Hires, JazzHR, ManatalGrok 4.1 FastManatalBreezy HRChangedagainst: Phenom, Wix, iCIMS AttractJazzHR, Manatal, TalentLyftagainst: Beamery, Phenom, SmartRecruitersJazzHRno first choiceagainst: Beamery, Phenomagainst: Avature, Beamery, Greenhouse, Indeed, LinkedIn Jobs, ZipRecruiter
Four alternatives
Recruitee, TalentLyft, Teamtailor, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Homerun, TalentNestFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Recruit CRM, Workable, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
100Hires, Manatal, TalentLyftFive alternatives
Manatal, RecruitBPM, TalentLyft, Workable, Zoho RecruitMistral SmallGreenhouse, Zoho RecruitWixChangedJazzHRagainst: SmartRecruiters100Hiresno first choiceagainst: Avature, Beamery, Joveo, Phenom, Symphony Talent
Two alternatives
Bullhorn, LinkedIn Talent SolutionsOne alternative
TalentNestOne alternative
LoxoDeepSeek V4 FlashBreezy HRagainst: SmartRecruiters, iCIMS AttractTeamtailorChangedagainst: MokaHR, Paradox, Phenom, Recruitee, iCIMS AttractJazzHR, Manatal100HiresManatal, Workable, Zoho Recruitagainst: Beamery, Phenom, Symphony Talentagainst: Appcast, Avature, Beamery, HubSpot, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Phenom, Salesforce
Four alternatives
100Hires, JazzHR, Workable, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, WorkableTwo alternatives
Recruit CRM, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
JazzHR, TalentLyftOne alternative
SmartRecruitersLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceTalentNest, WorkableChangedJazzHRWorkableno first choiceagainst: Avature
Three alternatives
Loxo, Recruiterflow, SmartRecruitersQwen 3.7 FlashJazzHRagainst: GreenhouseTeamdashChangedWorkableManatal, TalentLyftno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Avature, Beamery, LinkedIn Ads, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, PhenomPeople, Recruitics, Symphony Talent
Three alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, WorkableOne alternative
Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Greenhouse, JazzHR, Lever, TeamtailorTwo alternatives
Onapply, Zoho RecruitKimi K2JazzHR, LoxoBreezy HR, TeamtailorChangedBreezy HR, JazzHRagainst: Greenhouse, LeverManatalagainst: Recruitee, Teamtailor, Workableno first choiceagainst: Appcast, CareerBuilder, Glassdoor, Handshake, Indeed, LinkedIn Recruiter, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Monster, ZipRecruiter
Two alternatives
Beehire, WorkableOne alternative
HomerunFour alternatives
Manatal, Recruiterflow, Workable, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Indeed, JazzHRGLM 4.7 FlashXManatalno first choiceChangedWorkableBreezy HRno first choiceagainst: Calendly, GoodTime, Indeed, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Monster, Oracle Taleo, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Attract
Three alternatives
TalentLyft, Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Greenhouse, JazzHR, Manatal, TalentLyftTwo alternatives
JazzHR, ManatalMiniMax M2.5Workable, Zoho RecruitWorkableChangedagainst: WebflowJuggleHireJazzHR, Manatalno first choiceagainst: Avature, Greenhouse, Jobilla, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Zoho Recruit
Two alternatives
Bullhorn, JobillaFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Squarespace, Wix, WordPressSix alternatives
JazzHR, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo, Manatal, TalentLyft, WorkableGPT-6 LunaWorkableBreezy HRChangedTalentLyftagainst: WorkableZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Indeed, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, ZipRecruiter
One alternative
Breezy HRThree alternatives
JazzHR, Teamtailor, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
Breezy HRMuse Glimmer 30BManatal100HiresChangedJazzHR, Zoho Recruit100Hires, JazzHR, TalentLyftno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Avature, Beamery, Clinch, Eightfold AI, Joveo, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Phenom, Symphony Talent, VONQ
One alternative
Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Manatal, TalentNest, Teamtailor, WorkableFive alternatives
Appcast, CareerArc, Manatal, Recruitics, WorkableFour alternatives
JuggleHire, Manatal, Rally, WorkableBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 13 | 71 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 14 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 20 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 19 | 75 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:20 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 1 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 21 | 51 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 9 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 22 | 140 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 28 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 22 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 25 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 24 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:56 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:11 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 12 | 71 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 23 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 22 | 91 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 18 | 66 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bamboo HR read as BambooHR Recruiting
BambooHR read as BambooHR Recruiting
Breezy read as Breezy HR
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
LinkedIn read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS read as iCIMS Attract
Unresolved, counted raw
Beehire
Coveto
Eploy
Hazel
Indeed Attract
JazzH R
The Applicant Manager (TAM)
WordPress with job board plugins
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.