Index › Performance and talent management › Performance management › Small business › October 2026 Edition
Performance management for small business buyers
Asked as “performance management software”, and as “performance review tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · Lattice 16%
18Zoho People16Lattice1415Five52others
18% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Lattice (18%) replaces Effy AI (19% then, 8% now), 10 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Lattice leads at 18%, replacing Effy AI, which led at 19% and stands at 8% now: 10 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Zoho People18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Lattice (18%) replaces Effy AI (19% then, 8% now), 10 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-market
Lattice43%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 41% → 43%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Betterworks37%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Betterworks (33%) replaces Workday HCM Performance Management (32% then, 21% now), 12 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →
Zoho People18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Lattice (18%) replaces Effy AI (19% then, 8% now), 10 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketLattice43%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 41% → 43%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseBetterworks37%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Betterworks (33%) replaces Workday HCM Performance Management (32% then, 21% now), 12 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Zoho People18%0%24accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 16%
Zoho People18%0%24accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 16%02Lattice16%40%52criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 17% → 18%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 18%
Lattice16%40%52criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 17% → 18%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 18%03
15Five14%8%53accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 12%
15Five14%8%53accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 12%04
Leapsome11%10%31accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 12%
Leapsome11%10%31accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 12%05
BambooHR9%8%48accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 13% → 10%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 10%
BambooHR9%8%48accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 13% → 10%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 10%06
Effy AI9%0%23accepted challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 19% → 8%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 8%
Effy AI9%0%23accepted challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 19% → 8%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 8%07
ThriveSparrow9%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 8%
ThriveSparrow9%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 8%08
PerformYard5%7%30accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
PerformYard5%7%30accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%09
Small Improvements4%10%21accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%
Small Improvements4%10%21accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%10
Teamflect2%0%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Teamflect2%0%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Workday HCM Performance Management0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Workday HCM Performance Management0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Culture Amp0%50%12criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Culture Amp0%50%12criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Lattice vs TeamflectLattice vs HiBobLattice vs Small ImprovementsZoho People vs 15FiveZoho People vs LeapsomeZoho People vs TeamflectZoho People vs HiBobZoho People vs Small Improvements15Five vs Leapsome15Five vs Teamflect15Five vs HiBob15Five vs Small ImprovementsLeapsome vs TeamflectLeapsome vs HiBobLeapsome vs Small ImprovementsTeamflect vs HiBobTeamflect vs Small ImprovementsHiBob vs Small Improvements
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Zoho People18%
Zoho People18%02Lattice16%
Lattice16%0315Five14%
15Five14%04Leapsome11%
Leapsome11%05BambooHR9%
BambooHR9%06Effy AI9%
Effy AI9%07ThriveSparrow9%
ThriveSparrow9%08PerformYard5%
PerformYard5%09Small Improvements4%
Small Improvements4%10Teamflect2%
Teamflect2%11Culture Amp0%
Culture Amp0%12Workday HCM Performance Management0%
Workday HCM Performance Management0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday HCM Performance Management100%
12 of 12 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Enterprise-Level Platforms (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors)... very expensive, complex to implement and manage, often overkill for SMB needs” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Lattice40%
21 of 52 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“"For micro and small businesses (1–50 employees), the platform is a weaker fit due to a strict $4,000 minimum annual contract"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
SAP SuccessFactors100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“These are very expensive, complex to implement and manage, often overkill for SMB needs, and require dedicated HR/IT teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Culture Amp50%
6 of 12 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Why to avoid**: Very expensive with quote-gated pricing (no public pricing)” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 932 links across 161 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
53 answers · 63 citations · 12 models
49 answers · 68 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Effy48 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Workhuman42 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
40 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Betterworks29 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lattice23 answers · 31 citations · 13 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HiBob16 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
51 answers · 12 models
48 answers · 12 models
42 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 11 models
39 answers · 12 models
28 answers · 9 models
28 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 7 models
22 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best performance management software”, “performance management platforms”, “performance management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoho parent site Zoho People 18% | 18% | 277 | 6,600 | 50 | ||||
| Lattice lattice.com | 16% | 662 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| 15Five 15five.com | 14% | 296 | 6,600 | 32 | 32,362 | 22 | ||
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 11% | 298 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 | |
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 9% | 1082 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 | 1 |
| Effy effy.ai Effy AI 9% | 9% | 116 | 140 | 3 | 40,950 company | |||
| ThriveSparrow thrivesparrow.com | 9% | 60 | 110 | 1 | 24,978 | 2 | ||
| PerformYard performyard.com | 5% | 147 | 9,900 | 34 | 58,643 | $25 | 47 | |
| Small Improvements small-improvements.com | 4% | 92 | 1,000 | 137 | 43,657 | 1 | ||
| Teamflect teamflect.com | 2% | 149 | 880 | 12 | 12,592 | 30 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com, learn.g2.com). The first result for “best performance management software” is learn.g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best performance management software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which performance review tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top performance management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best performance management software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a performance management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which performance management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice15FiveChanged15FiveSmall Improvementsno first choiceagainst: Paycom, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Six alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Lattice, Peoplebox, PerformYard, SynergitaFour alternatives
BambooHR, Guidepoint, Lattice, NamelyFour alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Small Improvements, TeamflectThree alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, Zoho PeopleGPT-5.4 miniLatticeLeapsomeChangedagainst: Lattice15FivePerformYard, Small Improvementsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, LeapsomeOne alternative
15FiveFour alternatives
BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, PerformYardOne alternative
BambooHRGemini 3.5 FlashLattice, LeapsomePerformYardChangedagainst: LatticeEffy AIagainst: BambooHR, LatticeTeamflectagainst: Culture Amp, Lattice, LeapsomeEffy AIagainst: Latticeagainst: ADP, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex, Profit.co, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Five alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Effy AI, Small Improvements, TeamflectThree alternatives
Effy AI, Leapsome, TeamflectThree alternatives
15Five, Small Improvements, TeamflectFour alternatives
AssessTEAM, Effy AI, EvalFlow, Small ImprovementsFive alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, Small ImprovementsPerplexity SonarProfit.coagainst: Lattice15FiveChanged15Five15Five, Zoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Lattice, Rippling
Two alternatives
15Five, BambooHRFour alternatives
Factorial, Leapsome, Mitratech Trakstar, Sage HRFive alternatives
BambooHR, Culture Amp, Effy AI, Factorial, TrakstarTwo alternatives
BambooHR, PeopleGoalGrok 4.1 FastBambooHR15FiveChangedagainst: Workday HCM Performance Management15Fiveagainst: Workday HCM Performance ManagementEffy AI, Zoho Peopleagainst: Lattice, PerformYard15Five, Latticeagainst: 15Five, ADP Workforce Now, Culture Amp, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Five alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardOne alternative
BambooHRFour alternatives
BambooHR, Lattice, PerformYard, ThriveSparrowFive alternatives
BambooHR, Leapsome, PeopleGoal, PerformYard, ThriveSparrowMistral SmallAssessTEAMBambooHR, PerformYardChangedThriveSparrowZoho Peopleno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Keka HR, Zoho PeopleOne alternative
KekaSeven alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Leapsome, PerformYard, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Taito.aiDeepSeek V4 FlashLattice, LeapsomeBambooHRChangedagainst: Betterworks, Lattice15Five, BambooHRagainst: Culture AmpZoho Peopleagainst: BambooHRThriveSparrowagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Cornerstone OnDemand, Lattice, Leapsome, Profit.co, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Four alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Effy AI, PerformYardOne alternative
PerformYardThree alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
15Five, Small ImprovementsSix alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, PeopleGoal, PerformYard, TeamflectLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldLeapsomeThriveSparrow, Zoho Peopleno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, LeapsomeTen alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Effy AI, Hrider, Lattice, PerformYard, Quantum Workplace, Teamflect, WorkStory, Zoho PeopleQwen 3.7 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldagainst: SAP, Workday HCM Performance ManagementFeedbackPulseZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: ADP TotalSource, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Zoho PeopleOne alternative
15FiveThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, LatticeTwo alternatives
Small Improvements, ThriveSparrowKimi K215Five, BambooHRagainst: LatticeLeapsome, ThriveSparrowChanged15Five, Effy AIagainst: Betterworks, Small ImprovementsEffy AI, Zoho Peopleagainst: Latticeno first choiceagainst: 15Five, BambooHR, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Deel Engage, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkBoard, Workday HCM Performance Management
One alternative
Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, TrakstarSix alternatives
BambooHR, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Profit.co, ReflektiveTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Small ImprovementsGLM 4.7 FlashXLattice, Leapsomeagainst: Quantum WorkplaceLatticeChangedagainst: Chorus.ai, GongSmall Improvements, ThriveSparrowEffy AIagainst: Small Improvementsno first choiceagainst: Keka HR, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Five alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, PeopleGoal, Rippling, TeamflectThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, Lattice, PerformYardTwo alternatives
15Five, PerformYardMiniMax M2.5Leapsome, ThriveSparrowBambooHR, LatticeChangedLeapsomeagainst: LatticeZoho Peopleagainst: Latticeno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
Betterworks, Factorial, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, PerformYardOne alternative
BambooHROne alternative
Keka HRGPT-6 Luna15Fiveagainst: Lattice15FiveHeldTeamflectZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Lattice, Workday HCM Performance Management
One alternative
PerformYardOne alternative
BambooHRFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Lattice, PerformYardOne alternative
15FiveMuse Glimmer 30BThriveSparrowno first choiceChangedPeopleGoal, PerformYardEffy AI, Zoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Quantum Workplace, Workleap Officevibe
Five alternatives
BambooHR, Factorial, Keka, Leapsome, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
BambooHR, Lattice, Leapsome, RipplingThree alternatives
PeopleGoal, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Small ImprovementsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 11 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 8 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:44 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 16 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 11 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 18 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:36 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:51 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:58 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:25 | no | 0 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 23 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 12 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:36 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 17 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce
Deel HR read as Deel
Officevibe read as Workleap Officevibe
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workday read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday HCM read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workleap read as Workleap Officevibe
Unresolved, counted raw
Chorus.ai
Mitratech Trakstar
Referrerr
Taito.ai
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.