360 feedback
Asked as “360-degree feedback tool”, and as “multi-rater feedback software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · Effy AI 17%
34Lattice17Effy AI11Leapsome38others
34% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Lattice held the lead, −5 points on 40%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Effy AI24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Effy AI (23%) replaces Primalogik (20% then, 15% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Lattice34%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Culture Amp33%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 33% → 35%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Effy AI24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Effy AI (23%) replaces Primalogik (20% then, 15% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketLattice34%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseCulture Amp33%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 33% → 35%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Lattice34%2%48endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 35%
Lattice34%2%48endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 35%02Effy AI17%0%17accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%
Effy AI17%0%17accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%03
Leapsome11%0%42accepted challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 11%
Leapsome11%0%42accepted challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 11%04Culture Amp6%13%47accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 7%
Culture Amp6%13%47accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 7%05
Spidergap6%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Spidergap6%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%06
FeedbackPulse6%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
FeedbackPulse6%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%07
15Five4%6%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
15Five4%6%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
PerformYard4%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
PerformYard4%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%09
Primalogik2%0%17accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%
Primalogik2%0%17accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
SurveyMonkey0%69%13criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
SurveyMonkey0%69%13criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%13
EchoSpan0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
EchoSpan0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Small Improvements0%9%11accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%
Small Improvements0%9%11accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%10
Trakstar0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Trakstar0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Betterworks0%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Betterworks0%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Lattice vs SpidergapLattice vs FeedbackPulseLattice vs 15FiveLattice vs PerformYardEffy AI vs LeapsomeEffy AI vs Culture AmpEffy AI vs SpidergapEffy AI vs FeedbackPulseEffy AI vs 15FiveEffy AI vs PerformYardLeapsome vs Culture AmpLeapsome vs SpidergapLeapsome vs FeedbackPulseLeapsome vs 15FiveLeapsome vs PerformYardCulture Amp vs SpidergapCulture Amp vs FeedbackPulseCulture Amp vs 15FiveCulture Amp vs PerformYardSpidergap vs FeedbackPulseSpidergap vs 15FiveSpidergap vs PerformYardFeedbackPulse vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs PerformYard15Five vs PerformYard
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Lattice34%
Lattice34%02Effy AI17%
Effy AI17%03Leapsome11%
Leapsome11%04Culture Amp6%
Culture Amp6%05Spidergap6%
Spidergap6%06FeedbackPulse6%
FeedbackPulse6%0715Five4%
15Five4%08PerformYard4%
PerformYard4%09Primalogik2%
Primalogik2%10Trakstar0%
Trakstar0%11Betterworks0%
Betterworks0%12Small Improvements0%
Small Improvements0%13EchoSpan0%
EchoSpan0%14SurveyMonkey0%
SurveyMonkey0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SurveyMonkey69%
9 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“SurveyMonkey is not purpose-built for HR or 360 feedback and is missing anonymity thresholds, competency frameworks, and development planning.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Culture Amp13%
6 of 47 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy like Culture Amp (custom pricing, better for 500+)” Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt
Google Forms75%
6 of 8 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Basic Survey & Spreadsheet Tools (Excel, Google Forms, SurveyMonkey)... generally considered "toxic"” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Jotform100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tools like **Jotform** or generic survey platforms that are repurposed for 360 feedback regularly draw criticism... Too expensive, missing features, misleading free-tier advertising” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 978 links across 175 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 19 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · FeedbackPulse49 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Workhuman49 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Betterworks48 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Teamflect41 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 34 citations · 13 models
vendor site · CharlieHR28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sprad27 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirstHR27 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Intervue25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Effy24 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
48 answers · 11 models
46 answers · 12 models
38 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 13 models
28 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “360 feedback tools”, “360-degree feedback tool”, “best 360-degree feedback tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice lattice.com | 34% | 662 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| Effy effy.ai Effy AI 17% | 17% | 116 | 140 | 3 | 40,950 company | |||
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 11% | 298 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 | |
| Culture Amp cultureamp.com | 6% | 345 | 14,800 | 121 | 174,918 | 35 | 4 | |
| Spidergap spidergap.com | 6% | 109 | 260 | 1 | 97 | 11 | ||
| FeedbackPulse feedbackpulse.com | 6% | 73 | 20 | 0 | 21,184 | 4 | ||
| AssessTEAM assessteam.com | 6% | 26 | 140 | 0 | 3,097 | 5 | ||
| 15Five 15five.com | 4% | 296 | 6,600 | 32 | 32,362 | 22 | ||
| PerformYard performyard.com | 4% | 147 | 9,900 | 34 | 58,643 | $25 | 47 | |
| Primalogik primalogik.com | 2% | 63 | 260 | 0 | 8,664 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “360 feedback tools” is vimeo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-rater feedback software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top 360 feedback tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a 360-degree feedback tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which 360 feedback tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Latticeno first choiceChangedno first choiceAssessTEAM, ThriveSparrowno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Jotform, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow
Four alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, SpidergapTwo alternatives
Google Forms, SpidergapGPT-5.4 miniPerformYardPerformYardHeldno first choiceSpidergapagainst: SurveyMonkeyno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Fast MirrorTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, EngagedlySeven alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Primalogik, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Spidergap, TruScoreOne alternative
Effy AIGemini 3.5 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldLatticeAssessTEAM, TeamflectCulture Amp, Latticeagainst: Google Forms, Microsoft Forms
Four alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, TeamflectFour alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap, TeamflectSix alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap, TeamflectThree alternatives
Google Forms or Microsoft Forms, Primalogik, SpidergapThree alternatives
HiBob, Leapsome, PerformYardPerplexity SonarLeapsomeLeapsomeHeldno first choiceAssessTEAM, FeedbackPulseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Culture Amp, EchoSpan, LatticeOne alternative
LatticeFour alternatives
Effy AI, PerformYard, Primalogik, Small ImprovementsGrok 4.1 FastLatticeagainst: Qualtrics EmployeeXMLatticeHeldagainst: Culture Amp, Spidergapno first choiceEffy AIagainst: Google Forms, SurveyMonkeyno first choiceagainst: EchoSpan, Google Forms, Qualaroo, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey
Four alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
15Five, TrakstarNine alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Primalogik, Spidergap, TrakstarFive alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Spidergap, TeamflectMistral SmallLatticePerformance ProChangedno first choiceEffy AIno first choiceagainst: EchoSpan, Jotform, Keka, Small Improvements, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow
Two alternatives
Bonusly, LeapsomeTwo alternatives
Leapsome, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
Primalogik, TrakstarDeepSeek V4 FlashLatticeLeapsomeChangedagainst: Culture Ampno first choiceEffy AIno first choiceagainst: Jotform, Keka, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Four alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
Lattice, SpidergapEleven alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap, SurveySparrow, Trakstar, WorkTangoThree alternatives
Primalogik, Small Improvements, SpidergapLlama 4 MaverickLeapsomeLatticeChangedno first choiceEffy AIno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
15Five, Lattice, TrakstarEight alternatives
Betterworks, Culture Amp, Effy AI, PerformYard, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowOne alternative
TrakstarQwen 3.7 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldagainst: SAP SuccessFactorsLatticeagainst: SurveyMonkey, WorkdayEffy AIagainst: Google Forms, Microsoft Formsno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: Excel, Google Forms, SurveyMonkey
Three alternatives
Culture Amp, FeedbackPulse, LeapsomeThree alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture AmpFive alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, Trakstar, VantagePointThree alternatives
15Five, Lattice, TrakstarFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Hubstaff, LatticeKimi K2Latticeagainst: Culture Amp15Five, LatticeChangedCulture AmpEffy AIno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, Gusto, Rippling, UKG Pro
Three alternatives
15Five, Engagedly, LeapsomeThree alternatives
Culture Amp, Engagedly, LeapsomeSeven alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentSix alternatives
CharlieHR, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Spidergap, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowFour alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, SpidergapGLM 4.7 FlashXLattice, SpidergapCulture AmpChangedBetterworksEffy AI, FeedbackPulseno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Four alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, Engagedly, LeapsomeSix alternatives
Betterworks, EchoSpan, Engagedly, Lattice, Leapsome, SpidergapFive alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SpidergapFive alternatives
G360 Surveys, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Spidergap, TeamflectMiniMax M2.5Lattice, LeapsomeCulture Amp, LatticeChangedThriveSparrowEffy AI, Primalogikno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, SpidergapTwo alternatives
15Five, LeapsomeSix alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Primalogik, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentOne alternative
TrakstarGPT-6 LunaLeapsome15FiveChangedSpidergap, TruScoreSpidergapagainst: 15Fiveno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, SurveyMonkey
Two alternatives
Culture Amp, LatticeThree alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, LeapsomeFive alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardOne alternative
Interval 360Muse Glimmer 30BLatticeFeedbackPulse, LatticeChangedBetterworks, Culture AmpEffy AIno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Spidergap
Two alternatives
Culture Amp, LeapsomeThree alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, LeapsomeSix alternatives
Effy AI, FeedbackPulse, Impraise, Lattice, Leapsome, ReviewSnapFour alternatives
G360 Surveys, Primalogik, Small Improvements, TeamflectBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 1 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 9 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 12 | 69 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 16 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:17 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 14 | 151 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 11 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 17 | 243 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 21 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 26 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 16 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:31 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:01 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 18 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:57 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 22 | 81 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 13 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 12 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Effy read as Effy AI
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics (360 Development) read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 (EmployeeXM) read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Workday Peakon read as Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Unresolved, counted raw
Elevo
Interval 360
Learned.io
Mercer Mettl 360View
Sageo
SurveyConnect
SurveyMonkey Team Advantage
VantagePoint
WideAngle
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.