AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

360 feedback for enterprise buyers

Asked as “360-degree feedback tool”, and as “multi-rater feedback software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · Qualtrics 360 Development 17%
33Culture Amp17Qualtrics 360 Development11Betterworks39others

33% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 33% → 35%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Culture Amp held the lead, +2 points on 33%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Culture Amp33%13%61endorsed leader▲+2Since September 2026: 33% → 35%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.33% → 35%
02Qualtrics 360 Development17%15%34accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 6% → 13%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 13%
03Betterworks11%0%36accepted challenger▼−18Since September 2026: 31% → 13%, −18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 13%
04Lattice11%11%46accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 6% → 13%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 13%
05Qualtrics EmployeeXM6%17%12accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
06Leapsome4%3%33accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
07Spidergap4%43%23criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
08Workday Peakon Employee Voice2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
09Workhuman2%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
10EchoSpan2%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
1115Five0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Culture Amp33%
02Qualtrics 360 Development17%
03Betterworks11%
04Lattice11%
05Qualtrics EmployeeXM6%
06Leapsome4%
07Spidergap4%
08Workday Peakon Employee Voice2%
09Workhuman2%
10EchoSpan2%
1115Five0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Spidergap
43%
10 of 23 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“flagged concerns regarding confidentiality... For enterprises that require true admin-blind results, that visibility is a blocker.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Culture Amp
13%
8 of 61 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for Predictability - **Culture Amp, Qualtrics, Workhuman**: "Custom enterprise" pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
SurveyMonkey
86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“"Tools like **SurveyMonkey, Qualaroo, and easy-feedback-style platforms** were built for one-off surveys, not enterprise 360 programs. For a large organization these are red flags"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Qualtrics 360 Development
15%
5 of 34 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for Predictability - **Culture Amp, Qualtrics, Workhuman**: "Custom enterprise" pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1096 links across 227 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 19 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Betterworks59 answers · 72 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Workhuman55 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FeedbackPulse51 answers · 74 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Teamflect42 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Intervue36 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sprad29 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CharlieHR23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Engagedly22 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Effy22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “360 feedback tools”, “360-degree feedback tool”, “best 360-degree feedback tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Culture Amp cultureamp.com33%34514,800121174,918354
Qualtrics 360 qualtrics.com
Qualtrics 360 Development 17%, Qualtrics EmployeeXM 6%, Qualtrics XM 0%
22%901,600411,028,410 company$21665
Betterworks betterworks.com11%2653,6002112,3790
Lattice lattice.com11%66290,50013,900122,123$1,328120
Leapsome leapsome.com4%2982,9003251,450$18,53160
Spidergap spidergap.com4%10926019711
Workday Peakon workday.com
Workday Peakon Employee Voice 2%, Workday 2%
4%3831,220,00023,8482,213,450 company80
Workhuman workhuman.com2%1384,400158373,538$160,16272
Questback questback.com2%4
EchoSpan echospan.com2%361400104

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (engagedly.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “360 feedback tools” is vimeo.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-rater feedback software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade 360 feedback tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a 360-degree feedback tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which 360 feedback tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Culture Amp
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, Synergita
Betterworks, LatticeChanged
Two alternativesFlexible 360 by Echospan, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 Development, Workhuman
Two alternativesLattice, Leapsome
Culture Amp
Two alternativesLattice, Teamspective
no first choiceagainst: 15Five, Lattice, Primalogik, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Small Improvements, Spidergap, ThriveSparrow, Trakstar
GPT-5.4 miniCulture Amp
Four alternativesLattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Xref
Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentChanged
One alternativeCulture Amp 360° Feedback
Betterworks
Five alternativesCulture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Spidergap, Workday 360 Feedback
Culture Amp
One alternative15Five
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice
Five alternativesCulture Amp, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, Questback, Spidergap
against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Qualtrics EmployeeXMChanged
Five alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Explorance Blue, Leapsome, Teamflect
Explorance Blue, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Five alternativesCulture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Questback, Spidergap
EchoSpan
Two alternativesQuestionPro, Spidergap
against: Culture Amp, Lattice
Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Four alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome
against: CharlieHR, EchoSpan, Effy AI, Google Forms, Jotform, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Small Improvements, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, Workday
Perplexity SonarCulture Amp
Five alternativesLeapsome, Mitratech Perform, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 Development, Trakstar
Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentChanged
Four alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, PerformYard
Culture Amp
Six alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SurveyMonkey, Teamflect
Workhuman
One alternativeCulture Amp
against: Spidergap
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastCulture Amp
Two alternativesLattice, Leapsome
Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentChanged
Four alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard
Culture Amp
Six alternatives15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
against: EchoSpan, Spidergap
FeedbackPulse
Five alternatives15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Performance Pro, ThriveSparrow
against: Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap, Workhuman
no first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Qualtrics 360 Development, Small Improvements, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey, Workday HCM
Mistral SmallCulture Amp, Leapsome
Two alternativesLumus360, Trakstar
BetterworksChanged
Two alternativesLark, Qualtrics 360 Development
Betterworks
Four alternativesCulture Amp, Leapsome, Performance Pro, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Two alternativesCulture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
no first choiceagainst: G360 Surveys, Spidergap
DeepSeek V4 FlashBetterworks
Four alternativesCulture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics EmployeeXMChanged
Two alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp
Betterworks, Qualtrics 360 Development
Four alternativesCulture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Workday
Betterworks, Spidergap
Two alternativesCulture Amp, Lattice
against: Qualtrics 360 Development, Workhuman
no first choiceagainst: Engagedly, Google Forms, Jotform, SurveyMonkey, Teamflect
Llama 4 MaverickCulture Amp
Three alternativesLeapsome, Trakstar, Workhuman
no first choiceChangedno first choiceIntervue, Qualtrics 360 Development, Workdayno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Leapsome
Qwen 3.7 FlashCulture Amp, Lattice
One alternative15Five
Culture AmpChanged
Three alternativesLattice, Qualtrics XM, Spidergap
no first choice
Six alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Korn Ferry, Lattice, Qualtrics XM, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Lattice
Two alternativesQualtrics Employee XM, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
against: Culture Amp
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Forms, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 Development, Sprad, SurveySparrow, Xref
Kimi K2Culture Amp
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentChanged
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Workhuman
Culture Amp
Three alternativesLattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, Workday HCM
against: SAP SuccessFactors
Culture Amp, Leapsome
Three alternativesSAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
against: 15Five
Culture Amp
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Workhuman
against: Qualtrics EmployeeXM
against: 15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, SurveyMonkey, Teamflect
GLM 4.7 FlashXBetterworks
Seven alternatives15Five, Culture Amp, Effy AI, Lattice, Leapsome, Sprad, Workhuman
Culture AmpChanged
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lumesse, Qualtrics 360 Development
against: Teamflect
Culture Amp
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Lattice
One alternativeEffy AI
against: Culture Amp
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Betterworks
Four alternativesCulture Amp, Lattice, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 Development
against: Effy AI, Spidergap
Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentChanged
Six alternativesBetterworks, EchoSpan, Engagedly, Lattice, Leapsome, Workhuman
Workhuman
Four alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome
Culture Amp, Lattice
One alternativeWorkday Peakon Employee Voice
against: EchoSpan, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaQualtrics 360 Development
Three alternativesBetterworks, Culture Amp, Workday
Culture AmpChanged
Four alternativesBetterworks, EchoSpan, Mercer, Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 Development
Six alternativesBetterworks, Center for Creative Leadership (CCL) Benchmarks, Culture Amp, Hogan, Korn Ferry, Lattice
Spidergap
One alternativeSmall Improvements Grow
no first choiceagainst: Culture Amp Effectiveness 360, DIY survey tools, Microsoft Viva Glint
Muse Glimmer 30BQualtrics 360 Development, Questback
Two alternativesCulture Amp, Leapsome
against: SurveyMonkey
Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentChanged
Two alternativesBetterworks, Lattice
Culture Amp, Lattice
Five alternativesBetterworks, Impraise, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Panoramic Feedback
Two alternativesFeedbackPulse, Spidergap
against: Culture Amp, Lattice
no first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Lattice, Qualaroo, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:01yes910 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:33yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:01yes1826 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:08yes193 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:28yes2311 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:01yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:24yes2319 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:51yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:55yes1729 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:28yes1319 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:35yes1763 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:45yes540 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:33yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:45yes1235 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:00yes97 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:02yes26 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:31yes1221 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:14yes203 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:01yes218 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:25yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:19yes2020 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:32yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:55yes940 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:29yes1820 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:17yes2154 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:44yes934 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:08yes521 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:58yes1318 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:55yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:02yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:44yes1532 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:06yes205 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:14yes1811 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:38yes67 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:12yes2235 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:00yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:13yes1230 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:36yes2331 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:59yes2054 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:58yes1624 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:14yes727 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:48yes2137 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:59yes107 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:33yes24 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:47yes2132 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:58yes193 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:48yes1615 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:54yes189 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:09yes2146 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:29yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:39yes940 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:28yes2137 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:16yes1963 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:40yes1293 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:03yes219 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:08yes1728 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:50yes189 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:07no010 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:35yes726 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:39yes206 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:31yes148 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:49no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:15yes1849 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:09yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:26no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:24yes2128 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:44yes2225 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:46no010 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:14yes323 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:29yes1123 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:06yes169 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:46yes57 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:00yes1828 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:49yes306 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:03yes1911 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:00yes1414 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:27yes2358 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:09yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:39yes1540 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:23yes1922 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:00yes1930 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:36yes1742 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:28yes219 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:57yes2337 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Effy read as Effy AI
G360 read as G360 Surveys
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics (EmployeeXM 360) read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 read as Qualtrics 360 Development
SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday Peakon read as Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Unresolved, counted raw
Center for Creative Leadership (CCL) Benchmarks
Cultivate
Culture Amp 360° Feedback
Culture Amp Effectiveness 360
DIY survey tools
Flexible 360 by Echospan
Lumus360
MyMentor Insights
Panoramic Feedback
Qualtrics Employee XM (XM Platform)
Small Improvements Grow
Workday 360 Feedback
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Recognition and rewardsGoals and OKRs →