AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Performance and talent management › October 2026 Edition

Goals and OKRs

Asked as “OKR software”, and as “goal management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · Tability 22%
24Perdoo22Tability13Lattice41others

24% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▲+13Since September 2026: 7% → 20%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Perdoo held the lead, +13 points on 7%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Perdoo24%2%44accepted challenger▲+13Since September 2026: 7% → 20%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 20%
02Tability22%0%32accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 24%
03Lattice13%13%38accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 11% → 15%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 15%
04OKRs Tool11%13%15accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 13%
05Profit.co7%9%34accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 9%
06Mooncamp7%4%26accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 11% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 7%
07Betterworks2%23%26accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
08WorkBoard2%32%34criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
09ClickUp2%25%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Microsoft Viva Goals0%55%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
13Asana0%33%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
12Quantive0%29%24criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
10Weekdone0%19%31accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
1115Five0%6%18accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Perdoo24%
02Tability22%
03Lattice13%
04OKRs Tool11%
05Profit.co7%
06Mooncamp7%
07Betterworks2%
08WorkBoard2%
09ClickUp2%
10Weekdone0%
1115Five0%
12Quantive0%
13Asana0%
14Microsoft Viva Goals0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
WorkBoard
32%
11 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“**Enterprise-heavy platforms** (e.g., WorkBoard, Betterworks, Ally.io): Great for large orgs but criticized for: Quote-based/opaque pricing with high costs and minimums” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Asana
33%
7 of 21 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“"Not a developer issue tracker, an OKR specialist, or a BI tool — the moment any of those needs dominates, a dedicated product usually wins."; "These tools were never made to help you achieve goals."ance” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Weekdone
19%
6 of 31 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Statuses are auto-assigned from progress with no override...which would prevent recommending it for check-ins” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Microsoft Viva Goals
55%
11 of 20 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“AVOID: Discontinued / Dead-End Tools ... Acquired by Microsoft (2021), rebranded as Viva Goals, then Microsoft retired Viva Goals on Dec 31, 2025” Kimi K2, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1047 links across 165 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Tability57 answers · 117 citations · 12 models
vendor site · OKRs Tool50 answers · 93 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Mooncamp42 answers · 59 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow32 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Profit.co28 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ONES.com19 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · WorkBoard18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Teamflect17 answers · 21 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Rework17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Synergita17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G216 answers · 32 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best okr software”, “okr software”, “okr tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Perdoo perdoo.com24%12139018,14716
Tability tability.io22%993201439,8043
Lattice lattice.com13%66290,50013,900122,123$1,3281207
OKRs Tool okrstool.com11%57260206,73811
Profit.co profit.co7%117590028,00026
Mooncamp mooncamp.com7%71720058,6781
Betterworks betterworks.com2%2653,6002112,3790
WorkBoard workboard.com2%1081,9001966,805$5615
Teamflect teamflect.com2%1498801212,592308
ClickUp clickup.com2%73201,0001,733322,021$1,470120

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mooncamp.com, okrstool.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, synergita.com, tability.io, teamflect.com). The first result for “best okr software” is okrstool.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best OKR software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which goal management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top OKR tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OKR software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a OKR software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OKR tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp
Three alternativesPerdoo, Profit.co, Tability
MooncampHeld
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Perdoo
Tability
One alternativeMooncamp
OKRs Tool, Tability
Two alternativesSynergita, Teamflect
no first choiceagainst: Asana, Leapsome, Profit.co, SimpleOKR, Weekdone
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo
Two alternativesProfit.co, WorkBoard
LatticeChanged
Three alternativesBetterworks, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Perdoo, Weekdone
Three alternativesBetterworks, Leapsome, WorkBoard
Perdoo, Profit.coagainst: WorkBoardno first choiceagainst: Datalligence, Lattice, OKR Board for Jira & Confluence, Perdoo, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability
Five alternativesLattice, Leapsome, Oboard, Perdoo, Profit.co
TabilityHeld
Five alternatives15Five, Asana, ClickUp, Lattice, Mooncamp
against: Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive, WorkBoard
no first choice
Eight alternatives15Five, Asana, Lattice, Quantive Results, Tability, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard
against: Microsoft Viva Goals
OKRs Tool, SugarOKR, Teamflect
Four alternativesGoogle Sheets or Microsoft Excel, ONES.com, Synergita, Tability
Tability
Five alternativesLattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
against: 7Geese, Asana, Betterworks, ClickUp, Google Sheets / Excel, Jira Align, Koan, Microsoft Viva Goals, Monday.com, Quantive, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Perplexity SonarTability
Two alternativesMooncamp, Perdoo
PerdooChanged
Two alternativesBetterworks, Monday.com
Perdoo
Five alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Quantive, Tability, WorkBoard
Perdoo
Three alternativesOKRs Tool, SugarOKR, Tability
no first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Grok 4.1 FastLattice
Four alternativesMooncamp, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
against: Betterworks
LatticeHeld
Five alternatives15Five, Asana, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Profit.co
Tability
Five alternatives15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Weekdone, WorkBoard
against: Wrike
ClickUp
Three alternativesNotion, Perdoo, Weekdone
against: Microsoft Viva Goals
WorkBoard
Eight alternativesBetterworks, ClickUp, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Perdoo, Profit.co, Quantive, Wrike
against: Weekdone
against: Asana, Betterworks, ClickUp, Microsoft Viva Goals, OKRs Tool, WorkBoard
Mistral SmallPerdoo, Tability
Two alternativesLattice, Mooncamp
Betterworks, TabilityChanged
Two alternativesAsana, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: Excel/SheetsOKRs Tool, Oboard
One alternativeTability
no first choiceagainst: Storyflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashPerdoo
Three alternativesMicrosoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co
against: WorkBoard
TabilityChanged
Four alternativesLattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
no first choice
Six alternatives15Five, Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive, Tability
against: Betterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
OKRs Tool, Perdoo
Three alternativesONES.com, Teamflect, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: Asana, ClickUp, Jira, Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, OKRs Tool, Oboard, Range, Rhythms
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceLatticeChanged
Two alternativesBetterworks, Tability
no first choiceagainst: ClickUpOKRs Tool
One alternativeQuantive
no first choiceagainst: Storyflow
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Perdooagainst: Cascade StrategyLatticeChanged
Three alternatives15Five, Asana, Profit.co
Quantive, WorkBoard
Five alternativesAsana, Lattice, Monday.com, Notion, Weekdone
OKRs Tool
Five alternativesAsana, Notion, Storyflow, Trello, Weekdone
no first choice
Four alternativesAllotrope / Gtmhub, Microsoft Viva Goals, Pella, Weekdone
against: 15Five, Asana, Basic Notion Templates, Jira, Lattice, Manual Spreadsheets, Monday.com, Quantive, Sigma Ops, Trello, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Tability
Three alternativesMooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
LatticeChanged
Three alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Quantive
Tability
Seven alternatives15Five, Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
against: Quantive
Profit.co
Three alternativesGoogle Sheets / Excel, ONES.com, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: 7Geese, Koan, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, Quantive, Weekdone, WorkBoard
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability
Three alternativesMooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
against: WorkBoard
PerdooChanged
Three alternativesBetterworks, Monday.com, Workleap
no first choiceProfit.co
Three alternativesClickUp, ONES, Weekdone
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Tability
Four alternativesLattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
LatticeChanged
Three alternativesEngagedly, Leapsome, Tability
against: Betterworks
no first choice
Five alternatives7Geese, Lattice, Quantive, Wrike, airfocus
Profit.co
Two alternativesTability, Teamflect
no first choiceagainst: Asana, Betterworks, ClickUp, Lattice, Leapsome, Monday.com
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo
Three alternativesLattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
PerdooHeld
One alternativeLattice
no first choice
Six alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co, WorkBoard
against: Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Perdoo
One alternativeWeekdone
against: Lattice
no first choiceagainst: 7Geese, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Muse Glimmer 30BMooncamp, Tability
Three alternativesHiBob, Perdoo, Profit.co
against: Cascade Strategy
Cascade StrategyChanged
Two alternativesBetterworks, Mooncamp
no first choiceOKR, Perdoo
Five alternativesMeegle, OKRs Tool, SugarOKR, Synergita OKR Starter, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: Asana, Lattice, Monday.com, Storyflow, WorkBoard
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:29yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:59yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:33yes1722 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:44yes225 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:58yes2310 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:52yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:34yes2533 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:56yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:34yes932 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:03yes1922 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:58yes2472 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:04yes1024 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:12yes421 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:24yes1233 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:08yes188 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:04yes44 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:59yes1520 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:40yes203 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:12yes228 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:02yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:59yes2128 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:30yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:26yes1044 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:14yes1431 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:11yes2361 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:47yes2028 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:09yes29 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:12yes2233 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:46yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:35yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:33yes1529 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:54yes205 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:46yes178 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:21yes87 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:48yes2430 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:18yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:45no037 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:09yes1924 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:48no029 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:20yes2529 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:44yes720 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:56yes1521 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:18yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:58yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:50yes819 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:22yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:29yes248 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:36yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:57yes2424 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:22yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:18yes620 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:44yes1423 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:45yes24205 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:04yes1437 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:08yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:01yes1520 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:21no08 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:01no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:28yes1429 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:15yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:27yes139 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:07no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:11yes1924 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:20yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:11no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:52yes1825 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:31yes1355 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:56yes524 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:27yes219 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:05no03 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:33yes1910 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:22yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:24yes1522 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:42yes206 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:09yes188 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:04yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:34yes2133 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:41yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:21yes2083 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:51yes2333 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:41yes1838 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:01yes1023 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:02yes315 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:23yes2531 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ally read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io (Microsoft Viva Goals) read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io (now Microsoft Viva Goals) read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Cascade read as Cascade Strategy
Gtmhub read as Quantive
gtmhub read as Quantive
Unresolved, counted raw
Allotrope / Gtmhub
Basic Notion Templates
Datalligence
Fellow
Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel
Manual Spreadsheets
Meegle
Nifty
OKR Board for Jira & Confluence
ONES
Pella
Quantive Results, formerly Gtmhub
Sigma Ops
airfocus
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← 360 feedbackInternal talent marketpl →