AI Indexes
HR AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Talent acquisition › Video interviewing › Small business › October 2026 Edition

Video interviewing for small business buyers

Asked as “video interviewing platform”, and as “asynchronous video interview tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Hireflix14Spark Hire12Willo31others

43% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▲+6Since September 2026: 38% → 44%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Hireflix held the lead, +6 points on 38%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Hireflix43%0%54endorsed leader▲+6Since September 2026: 38% → 44%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.38% → 44%
02Spark Hire14%32%62criticized challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 6% → 17%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 17%
03Willo12%2%51accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%
04EasyHire.me10%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 12%
05myInterview8%14%22accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%
06Hirevire6%0%12accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 17% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 7%
07Google Meet Lab in the set2%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11HireVue0%74%35criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10VidCruiter0%70%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Zoom0%25%16criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
08Jobma0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Meet is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Hireflix43%
02Spark Hire14%
03Willo12%
04EasyHire.me10%
05myInterview8%
06Hirevire6%
07Google Meet2%
08Jobma0%
09Zoom0%
10VidCruiter0%
11HireVue0%

What they warned about

Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HireVue
74%
26 of 35 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“small businesses should avoid or be highly cautious about the following categories ... Enterprise-Focused Platforms with Gated Pricing (e.g., HireVue, VidCruiter)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Spark Hire
32%
20 of 62 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Pricing can be steep for smaller organizations, and the interface has a learning curve.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
VidCruiter
70%
19 of 27 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-focused Platforms ... VidCruiter is another enterprise-grade platform that small businesses should be cautious about” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Skype
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Why to avoid for structured hiring:** ... not a real recruiting solution.” Kimi K2, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1063 links across 144 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

51 answers · 75 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Willo41 answers · 74 citations · 13 models
39 answers · 48 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Spark Hire37 answers · 49 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rework32 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Hirevire31 answers · 84 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LinkedIn31 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirstHR30 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pin27 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G223 answers · 47 citations · 11 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best video interviewing platform”, “video interviewing platform”, “video interviewing platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Hireflix hireflix.com43%1011,900501,3909
Spark Hire sparkhire.com14%1764,40022811,632$9716
Willo willo.video12%1148,1001926,581165
EasyHire.me easyhire.me10%23100142
myInterview radancy.com8%41480107,6925
Hirevire hirevire.com6%6521004440
1Way Interview2%300
Pin pin.com2%199368,000243,38524,37528
Google Meet google.com2%231,830,00014,0731,800,358,416$465,9445
JazzHR jazzhr.com0%21014,8007011,75419

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, hiretruffle.com, linkedin.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com, willo.video). The first result for “best video interviewing platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best video interviewing platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which asynchronous video interview tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top video interviewing platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best video interviewing platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a video interviewing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which video interviewing platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5EasyHire.me
Three alternativesHireflix, Spark Hire, myInterview
EasyHire.meHeld
Two alternativesHireflix, Willo
Spark Hire
Three alternativesHireflix, Willo, myInterview
Hireflix
Three alternativesEasyHire.me, Hirevire, myInterview
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Jobma, Spark Hire, VidCruiter, interviewstream
GPT-5.4 miniSpark Hire
Four alternativesHireVue, Hireflix, VidCruiter, Willo
Spark HireHeld
One alternativeWillo
against: HireVue
Spark Hire, Willo
One alternativeinterviewstream
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
Hireflix
One alternativeWillo
against: Spark Hire
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashHireflix
Four alternatives1Way Interview, Spark Hire, Truffle, Willo
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
HireflixHeld
Two alternativesEasyHire.me, Willo
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
1Way Interview, Hireflix
Three alternativesEasyHire.me, Spark Hire, Willo
Hirevire
Six alternativesEasyHire.me, Google Meet, Hireflix, Willo, Zoom, myInterview
against: HireVue, Spark Hire
Hireflix
Two alternativesEasyHire.me, Willo
against: Google Meet, HireVue, Microsoft Teams, Skype, Spark Hire, VidCruiter, Zoom
Perplexity SonarWillo
Two alternativesPin, Spark Hire
HireflixChangedHireflix
Three alternativesJobma, Pin, Spark Hire
against: EasyHire.me, myInterview
EasyHire.me, myInterview
Five alternativesGoogle Meet, JazzHR, Jitsi Meet, Microsoft Teams, Zoom
against: Spark Hire
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Teams, Skype, Zoom
Grok 4.1 FastHireflix
Two alternativesSpark Hire, Willo
HireflixHeld
Two alternativesSpark Hire, Willo
Hireflix
Three alternativesSpark Hire, Willo, myInterview
against: HireVue, VidCruiter, Zoom
myInterview
Three alternativesHirevire, Spark Hire, Willo
against: Google Meet, Zoom
Spark Hire
Four alternativesHireflix, Pin, VidCruiter, Willo
against: HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
Mistral SmallHireflix
Three alternativesDucknowl, Jobma, Spark Hire
WilloChangedHireflix
Four alternatives1Way Interview, EasyHire.me, Spark Hire, Willo
1Way Interview
One alternativeAI Interviewer
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Spark Hire, myInterview
DeepSeek V4 FlashHireflix
Three alternativesEasyHire.me, Hirevire, Willo
against: HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
HireflixHeld
One alternativeWillo
EasyHire.me, Hireflix
Four alternativesJobma, Spark Hire, Willo, myInterview
against: HireVue
Hirevire
Three alternativesHireflix, Willo, myInterview
against: Spark Hire
Hireflix
Three alternativesHirevire, Spark Hire, Willo
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
against: HireVue, Interviewer.AI, Jobma, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
Llama 4 MaverickSpark HireWilloChanged
Two alternativesPin, Spark Hire
Spark Hire
Two alternativesHirevire, Pin
Pin
Three alternativesGoogle Meet, JazzHR, Zoom
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
Qwen 3.7 FlashSpark Hire
Two alternativesHireflix, Willo
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
HireflixChanged
Two alternativesSpark Hire, Willo
Spark Hire, Willo
Three alternativesHireflix, Pitch N Hire, myInterview
EasyHire.me
Three alternatives1Way Interview, Google Meet, Zoom
no first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, VidCruiter
Kimi K2Hireflix
Two alternativesSpark Hire, Willo
HireflixHeld
Two alternativesHirevire, Willo
against: HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
Hireflix
Two alternativesSpark Hire, Willo
EasyHire.me, Hireflix
Two alternativesJobma, Willo
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Skype, Spark Hire, Vieple, Willo, myInterview
GLM 4.7 FlashXHireflix
Two alternativesSpark Hire, Willo
against: HireVue
HirevireChanged
One alternativeHireflix
against: Spark Hire
Hireflix
Three alternativesSpark Hire, Willo, myInterview
myInterview
Three alternativesHireflix, Jitsi Meet, Willo
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Respondent Inc., Riverside.fm, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
MiniMax M2.5Spark Hire
Three alternativesHireVue, Hireflix, Zoom
Spark HireHeld
Two alternativesHireflix, Willo
Hireflix
Two alternativesWillo, Zoom
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
Hireflix
Four alternatives1Way Interview, Google Meet, Jobma, Zoom
no first choice
Two alternativesHireflix, Willo
against: HireVue, VidCruiter
against: HireVue, Spark Hire
GPT-6 LunaHireflix
One alternativeSpark Hire
WilloChanged
One alternativeHireflix
against: Spark Hire
Hireflix
Three alternativesSpark Hire, Willo, Zoom
against: Workable Video Interviews
Google Meet
One alternativeWillo
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
Muse Glimmer 30BHireflix
Two alternativesHirevire, Willo
Hireflix, WilloChangedHireflix
Three alternativesJazzHR, Spark Hire, Willo
Willo, myInterview
Three alternatives1Way Interview, Hirevire, JazzHR
against: Spark Hire
no first choiceagainst: HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:08yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:54yes24 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:07yes1822 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:06yes173 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:54yes189 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:00yes1410 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:26yes2228 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:03yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:39yes1030 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:36yes1523 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:23yes2440 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:29yes1024 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:47yes211 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:30yes1414 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:42yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:45yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:35yes917 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:37yes173 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:43yes216 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:56yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:16yes2222 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:21yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:09yes755 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:48yes1516 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:53yes25113 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:32yes520 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:20yes321 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:41yes1861 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:28yes179 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:26yes56 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:33yes2322 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:12yes205 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:58yes208 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:15yes1511 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:05yes2445 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:41yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:24yes1026 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:58yes1423 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:21yes23110 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:58yes1121 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:59yes526 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:03yes2564 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:07yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:27yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:15yes859 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:35yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:47yes236 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:55yes52 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:13yes2427 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:56yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:56yes1237 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:49yes914 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:02yes1830 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:30yes59 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:42yes215 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:16yes1321 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:06no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:22no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:15yes927 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:15yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:10yes137 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:22no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:47yes2257 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:44yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:49no026 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:54yes2125 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:46yes1015 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:37yes520 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:47yes223 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 07:43no01 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:10yes1510 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:31yes66 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:43yes1722 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:07yes193 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:10yes208 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:33yes158 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:00yes2228 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:25yes97 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:01yes2038 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:03yes2427 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:01yes2254 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:37yes2430 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:08yes525 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:43yes2128 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
EasyHire read as EasyHire.me
Unresolved, counted raw
Interviewing.io
Pitch N Hire
Respondent Inc.
Riverside.fm
Vieple
Workable Video Interviews
Yohm
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Technical hiring assessmEmployee engagement surv →