Time and attendance for small business buyers
Asked as “time and attendance system”, and as “employee time tracking software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · Clockify 19%
23Harvest19Clockify13Homebase45others
23% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Clockify (21%) replaces Homebase (21% then, 13% now), 9 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Clockify leads at 21%, replacing Homebase, which led at 21% and stands at 13% now: 9 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Harvest23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Clockify (21%) replaces Homebase (21% then, 13% now), 9 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-market
Clockify12%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Paylocity (13%) replaces UKG Ready (15% then, 7% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
UKG Pro25%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Harvest23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Clockify (21%) replaces Homebase (21% then, 13% now), 9 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketClockify12%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Paylocity (13%) replaces UKG Ready (15% then, 7% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseUKG Pro25%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Harvest23%0%16accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 14% → 21%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 21%
Harvest23%0%16accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 14% → 21%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 21%02Clockify19%2%45accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 9% → 21%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 21%
Clockify19%2%45accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 9% → 21%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 21%03
Homebase13%2%41accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 21% → 13%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 13%
Homebase13%2%41accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 21% → 13%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 13%04
Jibble8%0%18accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 6%
Jibble8%0%18accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 6%05
Connecteam6%5%41accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 9% → 6%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 6%
Connecteam6%5%41accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 9% → 6%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 6%06
Buddy Punch6%9%23accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Buddy Punch6%9%23accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07QuickBooks Time4%16%37accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
08
Toggl Track2%0%20accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 2%
Toggl Track2%0%20accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 2%09
TimeCamp2%0%13accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
TimeCamp2%0%13accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
When I Work0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
When I Work0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Hubstaff0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Hubstaff0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%10
Deputy0%0%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Deputy0%0%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Clockify vs HomebaseClockify vs ConnecteamClockify vs Toggl TrackClockify vs UKG ReadyPaylocity vs ADP Workforce NowPaylocity vs JibblePaylocity vs HomebasePaylocity vs ConnecteamPaylocity vs Toggl TrackPaylocity vs UKG ReadyADP Workforce Now vs JibbleADP Workforce Now vs HomebaseADP Workforce Now vs ConnecteamADP Workforce Now vs Toggl TrackADP Workforce Now vs UKG ReadyJibble vs HomebaseJibble vs ConnecteamJibble vs Toggl TrackJibble vs UKG ReadyHomebase vs ConnecteamHomebase vs Toggl TrackHomebase vs UKG ReadyConnecteam vs Toggl TrackConnecteam vs UKG ReadyToggl Track vs UKG Ready
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506Q07
0809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Harvest23%
Harvest23%02Clockify19%
Clockify19%03Homebase13%
Homebase13%04Jibble8%
Jibble8%05Connecteam6%
Connecteam6%06Buddy Punch6%
Buddy Punch6%07QuickBooks Time4%
08Toggl Track2%
Toggl Track2%09TimeCamp2%
TimeCamp2%10Deputy0%
Deputy0%11Hubstaff0%
Hubstaff0%12When I Work0%
When I Work0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ADP Workforce Now62%
5 of 8 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Complex Enterprise Systems (UKG/Kronos, ADP Workforce Now) ... Overly complex for small teams” Kimi K2, negative prompt
QuickBooks Time
16%
6 of 37 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“others like Quickbooks Time and TCP Software (formerly known as TimeClock Plus) are geared towards larger organizations but have options for smaller businesses” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Oracle Time and Labor100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Enterprise-focused systems** like Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, and Workday are often too complex and expensive for small businesses.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Workday Time Tracking100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Enterprise-focused systems** like Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, and Workday are often too complex and expensive for small businesses.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 997 links across 179 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
45 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
40 answers · 82 citations · 12 models
vendor site · TimeTrex30 answers · 47 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OnTheClock25 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G224 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirstHR18 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Everhour17 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Hubstaff16 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best time and attendance system”, “time and attendance system”, “time and attendance systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest getharvest.com | 23% | 31 | 135,000 | 89,364 | 711,234 | 46 | |
| Clockify clockify.me | 19% | 100 | 60,500 | 1,093 | 2,084,749 | 40 | |
| Homebase joinhomebase.com | 13% | 404 | 201,000 | 3,839 | 472,253 | $793 | 120 |
| Jibble jibble.io | 8% | 66 | 9,900 | 108 | 67,211 | 1 | |
| Connecteam connecteam.com | 6% | 573 | 49,500 | 288 | 312,449 | $13,504 | 120 |
| Buddy Punch buddypunch.com | 6% | 63 | 9,900 | 48 | 39,250 | 5 | |
| OnTheClock ontheclock.com | 6% | 20 | 40,500 | 25 | 783,980 | 6 | |
| Gusto gusto.com | 6% | 870 | 673,000 | 10,560 | 1,629,483 | 118 | |
| TimeTrex timetrex.com | 6% | 30 | 590 | 16 | 1,849,211 | ||
| QuickBooks Time | 4% | 1,000,000 | 54,681 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best time and attendance system” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best time and attendance system for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee time tracking software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top time and attendance systems for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best time and attendance system for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a time and attendance system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which time and attendance systems should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HomebaseTimeTrexChangedHomebaseClockifyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Clockify, Jibble, TimeClock Plus, TrackingTimeThree alternatives
Clockify, Harvest, Toggl TrackThree alternatives
Clockify, Hubstaff, JibbleThree alternatives
Deputy, Google Forms + Sheets, GuidepointGPT-5.4 miniGustoBuddy PunchChangedJibble, QuickBooks TimeHomebase, OnTheClockno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP RUN, Connecteam, Homebase, RipplingThree alternatives
Connecteam, Homebase, OnTheClockFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Gusto, Homebase, HubstaffOne alternative
ConnecteamGemini 3.5 FlashHarvestHarvestHeldno first choiceagainst: QuickBooks TimeJibbleGusto, Ripplingagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce, QuickBooks Time, UKG Pro, Workday Time Tracking
Seven alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Everhour, Jibble, QuickBooks Time, Toggl TrackThree alternatives
Clockify, Everhour, Toggl TrackFive alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, Homebase, Jibble, When I WorkThree alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, HomebaseSeven alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, TMetric, When I WorkPerplexity SonarBuddy PunchHarvestChangedConnecteamClockifyagainst: Connecteam, QuickBooks Timeno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Teams, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP, Workday Time Tracking
Five alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, When I WorkThree alternatives
Homebase, Hubstaff, Toggl TrackFour alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Homebase, When I WorkOne alternative
HomebaseGrok 4.1 FastClockify, Toggl TrackHarvestChangedConnecteam, Homebaseagainst: QuickBooks TimeClockify, HomebaseHomebaseagainst: ADP RUN, ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Kronos/UKG
Three alternatives
Connecteam, Homebase, QuickBooks TimeTwo alternatives
Clockify, Toggl TrackTwo alternatives
Clockify, Toggl TrackTwo alternatives
Connecteam, QuickBooks TimeMistral SmallTimeTrexHarvestChangedno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, PaylocityClockify, TimeCampno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Teams, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP, Workday Time Tracking
Three alternatives
BambooHR Time Tracking, Harvest, HomebaseTwo alternatives
BigTime, Toggl TrackOne alternative
ConnecteamDeepSeek V4 FlashHarvestHarvestHeldConnecteamJibbleno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Clockify, Hubstaff, Paper Timesheets & Spreadsheets, Punch Cards / Mechanical Time Clocks, QuickBooks Time, Time Doctor
Six alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Everhour, QuickBooks Time, TrackingTimeThree alternatives
BigTime, Clockify, Toggl TrackFive alternatives
Clockify, Homebase, Jibble, OnTheClock, QuickBooks TimeFour alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, My Hours, TimeCampLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceHomebaseConnecteamagainst: QuickBooks Time, TCP Software
Three alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, TimeCampThree alternatives
Deputy, Homebase, QuickBooks TimeQwen 3.7 FlashQuickBooks TimeHarvestChangedToggl Trackagainst: UKG Pro, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementConnecteamno first choiceagainst: Oracle Time and Labor, SAPagainst: Excel, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
Five alternatives
Deputy, Homebase, Hubstaff, Time Doctor, When I WorkThree alternatives
Clockify, QuickBooks Time, Toggl TrackFour alternatives
Clockify, Deputy, Harvest, HubstaffThree alternatives
Buddy Punch, Google Sheets / Excel, TimeCampKimi K2Gusto, QuickBooks TimeHarvestChangedClockifyClockify, OnTheClockno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, ClickUp, Gusto, Paychex Time & Attendance, Rippling, UKG/Kronos, When I Work
Four alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Deputy, When I WorkTwo alternatives
Clockify, Toggl TrackFive alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, Hubstaff, Toggl TrackTwo alternatives
TimeCamp, TimeTrexFive alternatives
Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, OnTheClockGLM 4.7 FlashXClockifyClockifyHeldHomebaseClockify, Jibbleagainst: Buddy Punchno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, TimeCampFour alternatives
Harvest, Hubstaff, QuickBooks Time, TMetricFive alternatives
Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, TimeTrexFour alternatives
Connecteam, OnTheClock, QuickBooks Time, TimeTrexMiniMax M2.5Homebaseagainst: TimeTrexHarvestChangedHomebaseClockify, Connecteam, TimeTrexno first choiceagainst: ADP RUN, ClockShark
Five alternatives
Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Jibble, QuickBooks TimeFour alternatives
Clockify, QuickBooks Time, TMetric, Toggl TrackFive alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Deputy, QuickBooks TimeOne alternative
TimeCampThree alternatives
ADP RUN, Gusto, QuickBooks TimeGPT-6 LunaBuddy PunchHarvestChangedHomebaseHomebaseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Connecteam, QuickBooks Time, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
Clockify, QuickBooks TimeFive alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Jibble, QuickBooks Time, When I WorkTwo alternatives
Clockify, ConnecteamMuse Glimmer 30BOnTheClockHarvestChangedClockify, JibbleJibbleno first choiceagainst: Buddy Punch, Homebase, Microsoft Teams, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP, TCP Software, When I Work, Workday Time Tracking
Four alternatives
Buddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, TimeCampThree alternatives
Clockify, QuickBooks Time, Toggl TrackFour alternatives
Buddy Punch, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, Toggl TrackThree alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, TimeCampBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 14 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:29 | yes | 18 | 55 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 9 | 65 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 12 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 9 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 18 | 34 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:51 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 25 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 19 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 9 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 12 | 87 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:30 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:19 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 16 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:42 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:29 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 9 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP (Workforce Now) read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP Time & Attendance read as ADP Workforce Now
BambooHR read as BambooHR Time Tracking
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce
Kronos read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Oracle read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Time and Labor
Paychex read as Paychex Time & Attendance
QuickBooks Workforce read as QuickBooks Time
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
Workday read as Workday Time Tracking
Unresolved, counted raw
Bamboo
Paper Timesheets & Spreadsheets
Punch Cards / Mechanical Time Clocks
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.