Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › Enterprise › September 2026 Edition

Org charts and org design for enterprise buyers

Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.

Standing

Orgvue

Contested

22% of first choices, contested.

ShowinginAll 50 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Organimi31%ContestedStanding →Mid-market

ChartHop27%ContestedStanding →Enterprise

Orgvue22%ContestedThis page

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant

Orgvue5%20accepted challenger

OneDirectory4%26accepted challenger

OrgChart8%36accepted challenger

ChartHop10%39accepted challenger

Ingentis org.manager0%21accepted challenger

Nakisa0%15accepted challenger

Organimi21%14accepted challenger

Lucidchart57%42criticized challenger

Microsoft Visio60%42criticized challenger

Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Microsoft PowerPoint100%10criticized challenger

Miro71%21criticized challenger

SmartDraw57%14criticized challenger

Pingboard35%31criticized challenger

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Head to head

ChartHop vs Organimi ChartHop vs OneDirectory Organimi vs OneDirectory

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%

Key

Orgvue22%

OneDirectory16%

OrgChart11%

ChartHop9%

Ingentis org.manager7%

Nakisa4%

Organimi2%

Lucidchart2%

Microsoft Visio2%

Pingboard0%

SmartDraw0%

Microsoft PowerPoint0%

Miro0%

02What they warned about

Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Microsoft Visio

60%

25 of 42 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 13 hard negative

“Tools to **Avoid** (Unsuitable for scale): - **Microsoft Visio**: Primarily manual/diagramming-focused with shape limits” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

Lucidchart

57%

24 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 13 hard negative

“Generic diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Visio, SmartDraw, Canva, or draw.io ... not for enterprise org management” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

Miro

71%

15 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 8 hard negative

“General-Purpose Visual Whiteboards & Flowchart Tools (e.g., Lucidchart, Miro, Mural)... they fall short when treated as official, enterprise-wide org chart systems” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

Microsoft PowerPoint

100%

10 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 9 hard negative

“Large enterprises should avoid—or be highly cautious of—four distinct categories of org chart tools... Microsoft Visio and PowerPoint ... are arguably the most inefficient tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: twelve of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 5 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 845 links across 168 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

theorgchart.com

43 answers · 76 citations · 10 models

gartner.com

vendor site · Gartner35 answers · 38 citations · 10 models

onedirectory.com

vendor site · OneDirectory33 answers · 41 citations · 9 models

orgchartstudio.com

vendor site · Org Chart Studio30 answers · 45 citations · 10 models

forbes.com

22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models

learn.g2.com

22 answers · 22 citations · 8 models

g2.com

20 answers · 34 citations · 10 models

gitnux.org

18 answers · 38 citations · 8 models

peoplemanagingpeople.com

vendor site · People Managing People18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models

zapier.com

vendor site · Zapier17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models

worldmetrics.org

16 answers · 30 citations · 8 models

teamohana.com

vendor site · TeamOhana15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software

35 answers · 10 models

onedirectory.com/blog/best-org-chart-software

33 answers · 9 models

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software-for-large-companies

26 answers · 10 models

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-org-chart-software

23 answers · 10 models

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software

22 answers · 10 models

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software

22 answers · 8 models

orgchartstudio.com/blog/org-chart-software-comparison

18 answers · 9 models

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software

17 answers · 9 models

zapier.com/blog/best-org-chart-software

17 answers · 9 models

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-org-chart-tools

16 answers · 8 models

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade org chart tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Orgvue

Three alternatives

OneDirectory, Organimi, Pingboard

no first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: LatticeOneDirectory

Three alternatives

ChartHop, Org Chart Studio, OrgChart

no first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Microsoft Word, Miro

GPT-5.4 miniLucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite

Three alternatives

Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart / OrgCharting-type HR org chart tools

OrgvueChanged

One alternative

OrgChart

Lucidchart

Three alternatives

Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, SAP SuccessFactors

against: MiroMicrosoft Visio

One alternative

OrgChart

against: Siftno first choicenothing named

Gemini 3.5 FlashNakisa Workforce Planning, Orgvue

Five alternatives

Altify, ChartHop, DemandFarm, OneDirectory, Sift

against: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioOrgvueChanged

Two alternatives

Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Workforce Planning

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroNakisa Workforce Planning, Orgvue

Five alternatives

Beyond Intranet, ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OneDirectory, TeamOhana

TeamOrgChart

Three alternatives

Ingentis org.manager, Organimi, SmartDraw

against: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Pingboard, SiftChartHop

Two alternatives

Pingboard, Sift

against: The Orgagainst: BambooHR, Lattice, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Mural, Organimi, Pingboard

Perplexity SonarNakisa

Four alternatives

Lucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, Venngage

OrgvueChanged

One alternative

Nakisa Org Design Suite

ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart

Seven alternatives

Lucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Nakisa, Orgvue, SmartDraw, Workday

against: CanvaOneDirectory

One alternative

OrgChart

against: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Mirono first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Canva, Freshteam, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, Sift, SmartDraw, draw.io

Grok 4.1 FastIngentis org.manager, OrgChart

Two alternatives

ChartHop, OneDirectory

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDrawOrgvueChanged

Four alternatives

ChartHop, Microsoft Visio, OneDirectory, Workday/SAP SuccessFactors

Nakisa, OrgChart

Three alternatives

Ingentis org.manager, OneDirectory, Pingboard

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDrawOneDirectory

Two alternatives

OrgChart, Organimi

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Org Chart Studio, Pingboard, SmartDrawOrgChart

Two alternatives

ChartHop, Pingboard

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miroagainst: BambooHR, Canva, Excel/Google Sheets, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, Workday, draw.io

Mistral SmallIngentis org.manager, Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite

Three alternatives

ChartHop, Microsoft 365/SharePoint Org Chart Software, SmartDraw

ChartHop, OrgvueChanged

Two alternatives

Mega HOPEX, Power BI

Nakisa, OrgChart

Two alternatives

Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite, Sift

against: Pingboard, SmartDrawIngentis org.manageragainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioChartHop

Four alternatives

Microsoft Viva Insights / Org Explorer, OrgChart, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Organization

against: Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro

DeepSeek V4 FlashOrgChart

Three alternatives

ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Orgvue

against: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDrawOrgvueChanged

Three alternatives

ChartHop, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart

Three alternatives

ChartHop, Nakisa, Orgvue

Creately, OneDirectory

One alternative

OrgPlease!

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Pingboardno first choice

Six alternatives

ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa, OneDirectory, OrgChart, Orgvue

against: BambooHR, Lucidchart, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workdayagainst: Canva, Creately, Gliffy, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Oracle HCM Cloud, OrgCharting, Organimi, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, draw.io

Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceFunctionlyChanged

Three alternatives

Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgBuilder by BCG X, Orgvue

no first choiceno first choiceOrgChart

Four alternatives

Cloudairy, HR Directory 365, OneDirectory, Pingboard

against: Microsoft Visio

Qwen 3.7 FlashGoProfiles

Three alternatives

ChartHop, OrgChart, Organimi

against: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioOrgChartProChanged

Two alternatives

ChartHop, Workday

against: Arithmetica, Excel, Microsoft VisioIngentis org.manager, OrgChart

Three alternatives

ChartHop, OneDirectory, Orgvue

Organimi

Three alternatives

OneDirectory, OrgChart.io, OrgChartPlus

against: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visiono first choiceagainst: Canva, Excel, Google Sheets, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Prezi

Kimi K2ChartHop

Two alternatives

Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio

OrgvueChanged

Two alternatives

Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory

ChartHop, OrgChart

Four alternatives

Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, Pingboard

OneDirectory

Two alternatives

OrgChart, OrgPlease!

against: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, OrgCanvas, Pingboardno first choice

Four alternatives

ChartHop, Nakisa Workforce Planning, OneDirectory, OrgChart

against: Creately/SmartDraw/Gliffy, Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Orgvue, Pingboard

GLM 4.7 FlashXNakisa, Orgvue

Seven alternatives

ChartHop, Happeo, Ingentis org.manager, Jostle, OneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard

against: Creately, Lucidchart, Miro, SmartDrawLucidchart, OrgPlusChanged

One alternative

Microsoft Visio

against: MiroOrgPlus

Three alternatives

Lucidchart, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

against: Microsoft VisioOneDirectory

One alternative

OrgChart

against: Lucidchart, Pingboardno first choiceagainst: Asana, Excel/Google Sheets, Google Drawings, Jira, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Monday.com, SmartDraw, Smartsheet, The Org

MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory

Three alternatives

ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart

Nakisa Org Design SuiteChanged

Four alternatives

Creately, Microsoft Visio, MindManager, Miro

Nakisa, OrgChart

Two alternatives

Lucidchart, OneDirectory

Stracl

One alternative

The Org

against: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgCanvas, OrgChartOrgChart

Three alternatives

ChartHop, Lucidchart, Pingboard

against: Excel, Google Sheets, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, draw.io

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record

Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 20:56	yes	9	8 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 19:40	yes	3	6 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 22:03	yes	12	51 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 20:51	yes	20	5 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 19:11	yes	28	15 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 18:28	yes	6	7 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 17:54	yes	15	18 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 21:29	yes	5	3 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 19:04	yes	10	32 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 21:10	yes	14	26 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 21:41	yes	10	49 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 19:50	yes	17	41 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 19:59	no	0	5 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 18:52	yes	2	6 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 19:02	yes	17	20 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 20:03	yes	20	7 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 18:36	yes	9	8 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 19:10	no	0	6 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 19:23	yes	17	18 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 18:26	yes	5	2 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 19:06	no	0	30 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 21:29	yes	8	19 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 19:51	no	0	38 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 20:22	yes	5	49 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 19:44	yes	9	10 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 20:40	yes	5	9 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 18:24	yes	14	25 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 20:14	yes	18	17 s
Comparative	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 18:43	yes	17	17 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 18:47	yes	9	10 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 17:55	yes	27	25 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 18:29	yes	5	3 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 20:29	yes	19	61 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 20:47	yes	18	54 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 20:25	yes	25	60 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 18:25	yes	20	36 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 18:05	yes	15	10 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 21:36	yes	3	6 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 17:53	yes	18	28 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 19:06	yes	20	7 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 19:55	yes	37	23 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 20:16	yes	5	4 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 20:11	yes	22	43 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 20:27	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 19:53	yes	5	55 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 21:00	yes	22	38 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 18:32	yes	21	62 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 19:25	yes	12	60 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 18:47	yes	18	14 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 21:23	no	0	8 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 21:51	no	0	20 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 19:43	yes	20	13 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 17:57	yes	22	18 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 18:48	no	0	10 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 20:49	yes	18	20 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 21:10	yes	5	4 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 19:27	no	0	27 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 21:01	yes	14	31 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 18:04	yes	28	89 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 21:46	yes	5	16 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 18:19	yes	14	11 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 18:28	yes	3	6 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 18:37	yes	14	26 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 21:00	yes	20	6 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 20:12	yes	38	18 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 20:02	yes	12	9 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-09-17 20:06	yes	24	87 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 20:34	yes	5	3 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 19:38	yes	5	46 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 21:00	yes	25	35 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 20:37	yes	10	49 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 17:56	yes	17	43 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings

Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager

PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint

Unresolved, counted raw

ARIS

Altify (by Upland)

Anaplan / Adaptive Planning

Arithmetica

Cortextual

Creately/SmartDraw/Gliffy

Gliffy

Mega HOPEX

Microsoft 365/SharePoint Org Chart Software

Microsoft Viva Insights / Org Explorer

OrgBuilder by BCG X

OrgChart / OrgCharting-type HR org chart tools

OrgChart.io

OrgChartPlus

OrgChartPro

OrgCharting

OrgWiki

SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Organization

Signavio

Software AG Alfabet

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Stracl

TeamOrgChart

Venngage

native modules in Workday/SAP SuccessFactors

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

Org charts and org design for enterprise buyers

By buyer segment

01The standing

Recommended versus criticized

02What they warned about

03What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

04How they answered

05The record

Normalization in this category

Also in workforce planning and analytics