HR AI Index
Index Vendors iCIMS › Alternatives · September 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to iCIMS, as AI models named them

In the September 2026 Edition, 368 of the 432 answers collected in the two categories where iCIMS holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 368 answers that did not name iCIMS, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Recruitment marketing and career sites

Talent acquisition. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when iCIMS is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessiCIMS holds 1 label here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name iCIMS; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

100Hires11 of 72
Manatal11 of 72
JazzHR10 of 72
Teamtailor8 of 72
Breezy HR7 of 72
TalentLyft4 of 72
Workable3 of 72
11 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketiCIMS is #11 of 15 here at 0% of first choices, 17 labels.

Sixty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name iCIMS; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-five answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

Teamtailor10 of 65
Phenom6 of 65
Jobvite5 of 65
Manatal5 of 65
Workable5 of 65
100Hires3 of 65
Pinpoint2 of 65
Rally2 of 65
10 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseiCIMS is #4 of 13 here at 6% of first choices, 25 labels.

Fifty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name iCIMS; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those fifty-five answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

Phenom15 of 55
Greenhouse6 of 55
Avature3 of 55
Beamery3 of 55
Bullhorn3 of 55
MokaHR2 of 55
Appcast1 of 55
Handshake1 of 55
6 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Applicant tracking systems

Talent acquisition. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when iCIMS is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessiCIMS holds 5 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name iCIMS; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

Breezy HR30 of 72
Workable11 of 72
Dover4 of 72
JazzHR3 of 72
100Hires2 of 72
Manatal2 of 72
Teamtailor2 of 72
6 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketiCIMS is #11 of 13 here at 0% of first choices, 15 labels.

Seventy of the seventy-two answers did not name iCIMS; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy answers, nine products in all, the eight most named:

Greenhouse28 of 70
Breezy HR8 of 70
Ashby4 of 70
Lever3 of 70
Pinpoint2 of 70
Workable2 of 70
100Hires1 of 70
1 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseiCIMS is #2 of 8 here at 19% of first choices, 56 labels.

Thirty-four of the seventy-two answers did not name iCIMS; it was the first choice in twelve. The first choices in those thirty-four answers, nine products in all, the eight most named:

Greenhouse4 of 34
Pinpoint2 of 34
Ashby1 of 34
JazzHR1 of 34
Lever1 of 34
Phenom1 of 34
1 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled iCIMS neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named iCIMS only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from iCIMS's side.

Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of iCIMS was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.