HR AI Index
Index Vendors Juicebox › Alternatives · September 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Juicebox, as AI models named them

In the September 2026 Edition, 376 of the 420 answers collected in the two categories where Juicebox holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 376 answers that did not name Juicebox, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Recruiting CRM and sourcing

Talent acquisition. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Juicebox is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessJuicebox is #4 of 13 here at 4% of first choices, 23 labels.

Fifty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name Juicebox; it was the first choice in four. The first choices in those fifty-five answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

Manatal8 of 55
Pin8 of 55
Loxo3 of 55
Fetcher2 of 55
Gem2 of 55
11 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketJuicebox is #10 of 11 here at 0% of first choices, 24 labels.

Fifty-eight of the seventy-two answers did not name Juicebox; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those fifty-eight answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

Lever8 of 58
Gem6 of 58
Manatal3 of 58
hireEZ2 of 58
100Hires1 of 58
ATZ CRM1 of 58
10 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseJuicebox holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Juicebox; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:

SeekOut9 of 72
Beamery8 of 72
Gem5 of 72
hireEZ4 of 72
Lever3 of 72
Avature2 of 72
8 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

AI recruiting assistants

Talent acquisition. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Juicebox is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessJuicebox is #6 of 9 here at 2% of first choices, 10 labels.

Sixty-six of the seventy-two answers did not name Juicebox; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those sixty-six answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:

Manatal14 of 66
Pin13 of 66
Workable4 of 66
Breezy HR3 of 66
Hirevire2 of 66
Bullhorn1 of 66
GoPerfect1 of 66
8 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketJuicebox is #10 of 13 here at 0% of first choices, 13 labels.

Sixty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name Juicebox; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-five answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

Workable7 of 65
GoPerfect6 of 65
Manatal5 of 65
Pin4 of 65
Ashby2 of 65
Greenhouse2 of 65
11 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseJuicebox holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Sixty of the sixty answers did not name Juicebox; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

Eightfold AI16 of 60
GoPerfect6 of 60
HireVue5 of 60
Workable4 of 60
Greenhouse3 of 60
Paradox2 of 60
iCIMS2 of 60
Gem1 of 60
6 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Juicebox neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Juicebox only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Juicebox's side.

Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Juicebox was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.