Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Internal communications › Small business › October 2026 Edition
Internal communications and intranet for small business buyers
Asked as “employee intranet”, and as “internal communications platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · Connecteam 18%
20Slack18Connecteam09Google Sites54others
20% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Slack (19%) replaces Microsoft SharePoint (24% then, 4% now), 15 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Slack leads at 19%, replacing Microsoft SharePoint, which led at 24% and stands at 4% now: 15 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Slack20%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Slack (19%) replaces Microsoft SharePoint (24% then, 4% now), 15 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-market
Microsoft Teams14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Teams (14%) replaces Happeo (16% then, 0% now), 14 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Simpplr17%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 24% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Slack20%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Slack (19%) replaces Microsoft SharePoint (24% then, 4% now), 15 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Teams14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Teams (14%) replaces Happeo (16% then, 0% now), 14 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseSimpplr17%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 24% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Slack20%6%17accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 24% → 19%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 19%
Slack20%6%17accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 24% → 19%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 19%02
Connecteam18%0%32accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 7% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 17%
Connecteam18%0%32accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 7% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 17%03
Google Sites Lab in the set9%7%27accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 6%
Google Sites Lab in the set9%7%27accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 6%04
Notion9%8%25accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 5% → 11%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 11%
Notion9%8%25accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 5% → 11%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 11%05
Microsoft SharePoint7%45%47criticized challenger▼−20Since September 2026: 24% → 4%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 4%
Microsoft SharePoint7%45%47criticized challenger▼−20Since September 2026: 24% → 4%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 4%06Oak Engage5%0%10accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
07
Zoho Connect4%0%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Zoho Connect4%0%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%08
Softr4%0%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Softr4%0%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%09
Jostle2%0%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Jostle2%0%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%10
Happeo2%9%22accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%
Happeo2%9%22accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%11Microsoft Teams2%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Microsoft Teams2%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%12
Workvivo2%56%34criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Workvivo2%56%34criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%13Simpplr2%70%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Simpplr2%70%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
LumApps0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
LumApps0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%16
Staffbase0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Staffbase0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
Atlassian Confluence0%20%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Atlassian Confluence0%20%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Sites is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models four times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Teams vs SlackMicrosoft Teams vs ThoughtFarmerMicrosoft Teams vs WorkvivoMicrosoft Teams vs Google SitesSimpplr vs Microsoft SharePointSimpplr vs ConnecteamSimpplr vs SlackSimpplr vs ThoughtFarmerSimpplr vs WorkvivoSimpplr vs Google SitesMicrosoft SharePoint vs ConnecteamMicrosoft SharePoint vs SlackMicrosoft SharePoint vs ThoughtFarmerMicrosoft SharePoint vs WorkvivoMicrosoft SharePoint vs Google SitesConnecteam vs SlackConnecteam vs ThoughtFarmerConnecteam vs WorkvivoConnecteam vs Google SitesSlack vs ThoughtFarmerSlack vs WorkvivoSlack vs Google SitesThoughtFarmer vs WorkvivoThoughtFarmer vs Google SitesWorkvivo vs Google Sites
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405O06
07080910111213141516Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Slack20%
Slack20%02Connecteam18%
Connecteam18%03Google Sites9%
Google Sites9%04Notion9%
Notion9%05Microsoft SharePoint7%
Microsoft SharePoint7%06Oak Engage5%
07Zoho Connect4%
Zoho Connect4%08Softr4%
Softr4%09Jostle2%
Jostle2%10Happeo2%
Happeo2%11Microsoft Teams2%
Microsoft Teams2%12Workvivo2%
Workvivo2%13Simpplr2%
Simpplr2%14Atlassian Confluence0%
Atlassian Confluence0%15LumApps0%
LumApps0%16Staffbase0%
Staffbase0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Simpplr70%
21 of 30 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Enterprise-First Platforms (Simpplr, Staffbase, Workvivo)These platforms can be problematic for small businesses” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Workvivo56%
19 of 34 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Workvivo's pricing structure often makes it less accessible for small businesses, with the Business plan starting at $20,000 per year” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Microsoft SharePoint45%
21 of 47 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“here are the intranet platforms that small businesses should avoid or approach with caution: ... Microsoft SharePoint ... Complex setup and maintenance” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Staffbase76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“not built to sell to a small business. Simpplr, Staffbase, and Workvivo publish neither a price nor a minimum” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 986 links across 195 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Workvivo47 answers · 88 citations · 14 models
37 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FirstHR35 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G235 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Oak33 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Simpplr32 answers · 38 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Softr28 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Happeo21 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · AgilityPortal20 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 12 models
31 answers · 12 models
31 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee intranet”, “employee intranet”, “intranet platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slack slack.com | 20% | 99 | 1,000,000 | 30,850 | 1,672,555 | $27 | 120 | |
| Connecteam connecteam.com | 18% | 573 | 49,500 | 288 | 312,449 | $13,504 | 120 | 7 |
| Google Sites google.com Google Sites 9%, Google Workspace 2% | 11% | 38 | 673,000 | 5,954 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 | |
| Notion notion.com | 9% | 72 | 673,000 | 15,608 | 1,061,466 | 52 | ||
| Microsoft Teams microsoft.com Microsoft SharePoint 7%, Microsoft Teams 2% | 9% | 123 | 673,000 | 16,550 | 145,358,109 | $12,455 | 103 | |
| Bitrix24 bitrix24.com | 7% | 23 | 5,400 | 90 | 69,160 | 104 | ||
| Oak Engage | 5% | 70 | 3 | |||||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Connect 4% | 4% | 25 | 1,300 | 49 | ||||
| Softr softr.io | 4% | 22 | 368,000 | 279 | 146,476 | 45 | ||
| Jostle jostle.me | 2% | 48 | 18,100 | 275 | 23,100 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (axerosolutions.com, happeo.com, learn.g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, simpplr.com, workvivo.com). The first result for “best employee intranet” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best employee intranet for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which internal communications platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top intranet platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee intranet for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an employee intranet. What should we look at?”Negative“Which intranet platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceSlackChangedHappeoagainst: Atlassian Confluence, Microsoft SharePoint, NotionBitrix24no first choiceagainst: Atlassian Confluence, Blink, Igloo Software, MangoApps, Microsoft Viva Engage, Simpplr, Staffbase, Unily, Workvivo
One alternative
Microsoft TeamsFive alternatives
ClickUp, Jostle, Simpplr, Workvivo, Zoho ConnectFive alternatives
Microsoft SharePoint, Noodle, Oak Engage, ThoughtFarmer, Zoho ConnectGPT-5.4 miniSimpplrSlackChangedagainst: Discord, Google ChatMicrosoft SharePoint + Viva Connectionsagainst: LumApps, Simpplr, WorkvivoMicrosoft SharePoint Online via Microsoft 365 Business Basicagainst: LumApps, Simpplr, Workvivono first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Interact, LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, WorkvivoThree alternatives
Mattermost, Microsoft Teams, Rocket.ChatFour alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Google Workspace, Notion, SliteOne alternative
SharePoint Plan 1Gemini 3.5 FlashHappeoSlackChangedNotion, Sliteagainst: Microsoft SharePointGoogle Sites, Microsoft SharePointagainst: LumApps, Simpplr, WorkvivoNotionagainst: SharePoint Communication Sitesagainst: Drupal, Interact, Jive, LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Strapi, Unily, WordPress-based intranets, dotCMS
Five alternatives
Guru, Jostle, Microsoft SharePoint, Notion, SoftrThree alternatives
Basecamp, Google Chat, Microsoft TeamsFour alternatives
Basecamp, Happeo, Lark, WorkvivoFour alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Blink, Notion, Zoho ConnectFive alternatives
Google Sites, Guru, Happeo, Jostle, WorkvivoPerplexity SonarZoho Connectagainst: Simpplr, Staffbase, WorkvivoSlackChangedZoho ConnectConnecteam, Google Sitesno first choiceagainst: Custom-built or homemade intranets, LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Viva, Simpplr, Staffbase, Unily, Workvivo
Three alternatives
Connecteam, Google Sites, JostleFour alternatives
Blink, Flock, Google Chat, MeetFour alternatives
Connecteam, Microsoft SharePoint, Softr, WorkvivoTwo alternatives
Microsoft SharePoint, Zoho ConnectGrok 4.1 FastOak EngageSlackChangedagainst: DiscordConnecteamagainst: Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Simpplr, Slack, WorkvivoConnecteamagainst: WorkvivoHub, Jostle, Oak Engageagainst: Microsoft SharePointagainst: LumApps, MangoApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Unily, Workvivo
Five alternatives
Connecteam, Jostle, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, SimpplrOne alternative
Microsoft TeamsFour alternatives
Google Sites, Jostle, MyHub Intranet, NotionOne alternative
Google SitesFour alternatives
ClickUp, Google Sites+Spaces, Microsoft Viva Connections, Zoho ConnectMistral SmallConnecteam, Oak Engageno first choiceChangedno first choiceConnecteamno first choiceagainst: Jive, MangoApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Snapcomms, Staffbase, Workvivo
One alternative
HappeoSeven alternatives
Connecteam, Happeo, Jostle, Microsoft SharePoint, Softr, ThoughtFarmer, WorkvivoOne alternative
AssemblyDeepSeek V4 FlashConnecteamagainst: Simpplr, Unily, WorkvivoSlackChangedAtlassian Confluence, Notionagainst: Microsoft SharePoint, SimpplrZoho Connectagainst: HumHub, Nextcloud, OnlyOfficeno first choiceagainst: Alfresco, Atlassian Confluence, Liferay, MangoApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Workvivo
Four alternatives
Happeo, Jostle, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft VivaTwo alternatives
Google Chat, Microsoft TeamsThree alternatives
Happeo, Jostle, WorkvivoTwo alternatives
Bitrix24, ConnecteamLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceConnecteamno first choiceagainst: LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr
Two alternatives
Microsoft SharePoint, Zoho ConnectQwen 3.7 FlashNotionagainst: Microsoft SharePointSlackChangedJostleConnecteamCoda, Notionagainst: Google Sites, Microsoft Vivaagainst: LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Workplace from Meta
Two alternatives
Hivebrite, Workplace from MetaTwo alternatives
Google Chat, Microsoft TeamsFour alternatives
Blink, Connecteam, Google Workspace, eXo PlatformThree alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Microsoft SharePoint, Zoho ConnectThree alternatives
Jostle, Oak Engage, StaffbaseKimi K2Notion, Pebbagainst: Simpplr, WorkvivoMicrosoft TeamsChangedagainst: ChantyGoogle Sites, Google Workspace, Notionagainst: Microsoft SharePoint, WorkvivoConnecteamagainst: Microsoft SharePointno first choiceagainst: Microsoft SharePointagainst: MangoApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Workvivo
Three alternatives
Google Sites, Microsoft SharePoint, MyHub IntranetTwo alternatives
Google Chat, SlackTwo alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, SoftrThree alternatives
Google Sites, Google Workspace, JostleSix alternatives
Connecteam, Google Sites, Jostle, Microsoft Teams, Notion, SlackGLM 4.7 FlashXBitrix24SlackChangedagainst: Bitrix24Lark, Softragainst: Microsoft SharePoint, StaffbaseBitrix24, Softrno first choiceagainst: Atlassian Confluence, LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Unily, Workvivo
Nine alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Connecteam, Google Sites, Jostle, Microsoft SharePoint, MyHub Intranet, Notion, Softr, WorkvivoThree alternatives
Chanty, Microsoft Teams, PumbleFive alternatives
Blink, Google Sites, Google Workspace, Jostle, WorkvivoThree alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Connecteam, Open IntranetMiniMax M2.5Google Workspace, Microsoft SharePointSlackChangedConnecteam, Jostleagainst: UnilyGoogle Sites, Workvivoagainst: NotionNotion, Softragainst: LumApps, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Staffbase, Unily, Workvivo
Three alternatives
Connecteam, Jostle, UnilyThree alternatives
Lark Suite, Microsoft Teams, ZoomThree alternatives
Happeo, MangoApps, SimpplrOne alternative
Bitrix24Two alternatives
Jostle, Microsoft VivaGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft SharePointSlackChangedNotionagainst: HappeoConnecteam, Google SitesGoogle Sites, Microsoft SharePointagainst: Google Sites, Happeo, Microsoft SharePoint, Simpplr, Workplace from Meta, Workvivo
One alternative
HappeoTwo alternatives
Google Chat, Microsoft TeamsFour alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Google Sites, Microsoft SharePoint, SlabMuse Glimmer 30Bno first choiceSlackChangedJostle, PebbBitrix24, Connecteamno first choiceagainst: Appspace, MangoApps, Simpplr, Staffbase, Workvivo
Eight alternatives
Connecteam, Happeo, Hub, Interact, Jostle, Microsoft SharePoint, Oak Engage, WorkvivoOne alternative
Microsoft TeamsThree alternatives
Atlassian Confluence, Microsoft SharePoint, NotionFive alternatives
Google Sites, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, ThoughtFarmer, Zoho ConnectBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:34 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 7 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:17 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:31 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 15 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:16 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:45 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:29 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 25 | 58 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 20 | 63 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 23 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 15 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 8 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:17 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:11 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 18 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 28 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 11 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 15 | 77 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 20 | 109 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 18 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Confluence read as Atlassian Confluence
Confluence (Atlassian) read as Atlassian Confluence
Igloo read as Igloo Software
SharePoint read as Microsoft SharePoint
SharePoint (Microsoft 365) read as Microsoft SharePoint
SharePoint (Microsoft) read as Microsoft SharePoint
SharePoint (as a standalone intranet) read as Microsoft SharePoint
Workplace by Meta read as Workplace from Meta
Unresolved, counted raw
Alfresco
Custom-built or homemade intranets
Glasscubes
Google Sites+Spaces
Google Workspace-based setups
Lark Suite
Microsoft SharePoint Online via Microsoft 365 Business Basic
OnlyOffice
SharePoint Communication Sites
SharePoint Plan 1
Slab
Softr.io
Strapi
Talkspirit
TikiTokki
WordPress-based intranets
dotCMS
intranet.ai
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.