HR AI Index
Index Vendors Profit.co › Alternatives · September 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Profit.co, as AI models named them

In the September 2026 Edition, 362 of the 432 answers collected in the two categories where Profit.co holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 362 answers that did not name Profit.co, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Goals and OKRs

Performance and talent management. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Profit.co is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessProfit.co is #3 of 13 here at 7% of first choices, 19 labels.

Sixty-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Profit.co; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those sixty-two answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

4 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketProfit.co is #6 of 17 here at 7% of first choices, 33 labels.

Fifty-four of the seventy-two answers did not name Profit.co; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those fifty-four answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

6 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseProfit.co is #3 of 13 here at 14% of first choices, 43 labels.

Forty of the seventy-two answers did not name Profit.co; it was the first choice in eleven. The first choices in those forty answers, eight products in all:

The full enterprise standing →

Performance management

Performance and talent management. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Profit.co is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessProfit.co holds 8 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Sixty-seven of the seventy-two answers did not name Profit.co; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-seven answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

Effy AI13 of 67
Lattice10 of 67
15Five7 of 67
BambooHR7 of 67
Leapsome4 of 67
9 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketProfit.co is #10 of 14 here at 0% of first choices, 10 labels.

Sixty-seven of the seventy-two answers did not name Profit.co; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-seven answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

Lattice25 of 67
15Five3 of 67
HiBob3 of 67
AssessTEAM1 of 67
7 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseProfit.co holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Profit.co; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

7 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Profit.co neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Profit.co only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Profit.co's side.

Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Profit.co was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.